Literature DB >> 30407496

Volumes of the Hippocampal Formation Differentiate Component Processes of Memory in a Community Sample of Homeless and Marginally Housed Persons.

Kristina M Gicas1, Allen E Thornton2, Kristina Waclawik2, Nena Wang2, Andrea A Jones1, William J Panenka1, Donna J Lang3, Geoff N Smith1, Fidel Vila-Rodriguez1, Olga Leonova1, Alasdair M Barr4, Ric M Procyshyn1, Tari Buchanan1, Wayne Su1, Alexandra T Vertinsky3, Alexander Rauscher5, G William MacEwan1, William G Honer1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Persons who are homeless or marginally housed exhibit significant cognitive dysfunction, with memory being the most impaired domain. Hippocampal subfield volumes have been found to differentially relate to component processes of memory. The neural correlates of memory have not been previously examined in marginalized persons who are understudied and underserved. We examined whether hippocampal subfields and entorhinal cortex volumes are uniquely related to indices of verbal episodic memory using the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised.
METHOD: Data was used from a large sample of community dwelling homeless and marginally housed adults (N = 227). Regression analyses were conducted to examine hippocampal subfield volumes (CA1, CA3, CA4, dentate gyrus, subiculum) and entorhinal cortex, and their associations with measures of verbal immediate recall, learning slope, and verbal delayed recall.
RESULTS: Greater CA3 subfield volume was associated with better performance on an index of encoding (immediate recall), but only in older individuals. Greater CA1 and subiculum volumes were associated with better performance on immediate and delayed recall (measures that tap into retrieval processes), but not with learning slope (a more pure index of encoding). Entorhinal cortex volume was related to all components of memory beyond total hippocampal volume.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest common neuroanatomical correlates of memory dysfunction in large sample of marginalized persons, and these are uniquely related to different components of memory. These findings have clinical relevance for marginalized populations and theoretical relevance to the growing literature on functional specialization of the hippocampal subfields.
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognition; Comorbidity; Hippocampus; Memory; Neuroimaging

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30407496     DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acy066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol        ISSN: 0887-6177            Impact factor:   2.813


  4 in total

1.  A comparison of regional brain volumes and white matter connectivity in subjects with stimulant induced psychosis versus schizophrenia.

Authors:  Peter D Alexander; Kristina M Gicas; Alex Cheng; Donna J Lang; Ric M Procyshyn; Alexandra T Vertinsky; William J Panenka; Allen E Thornton; Alexander Rauscher; Jamie Y X Wong; Tasha Chan; Andrea A Jones; F Vila-Rodriguez; William G Honer; Alasdair M Barr
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2019-06-22       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Anterolateral entorhinal cortex volume is associated with memory retention in clinically unimpaired older adults.

Authors:  Lok-Kin Yeung; Christiane Hale; Batool Rizvi; Kay Igwe; Richard P Sloan; Lawrence S Honig; Scott A Small; Adam M Brickman
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 4.673

3.  Novel characterization of the relationship between verbal list-learning outcomes and hippocampal subfields in healthy adults.

Authors:  Sandrine Cremona; Laure Zago; Emmanuel Mellet; Laurent Petit; Alexandre Laurent; Antonietta Pepe; Ami Tsuchida; Naka Beguedou; Marc Joliot; Christophe Tzourio; Bernard Mazoyer; Fabrice Crivello
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 4.  FreeSurfer-based segmentation of hippocampal subfields: A review of methods and applications, with a novel quality control procedure for ENIGMA studies and other collaborative efforts.

Authors:  Philipp G Sämann; Juan Eugenio Iglesias; Boris Gutman; Dominik Grotegerd; Ramona Leenings; Claas Flint; Udo Dannlowski; Emily K Clarke-Rubright; Rajendra A Morey; Theo G M van Erp; Christopher D Whelan; Laura K M Han; Laura S van Velzen; Bo Cao; Jean C Augustinack; Paul M Thompson; Neda Jahanshad; Lianne Schmaal
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-12-27       Impact factor: 5.038

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.