Ying Li, Guangming Zhu, Victoria Ding1, Bin Jiang, Robyn L Ball2, Neera Ahuja3, Fatima Rodriguez4, Dominik Fleischmann5, Manisha Desai2, David Saloner6, Luca Saba7, Max Wintermark, Jason Hom3. 1. Department of Medicine, Quantitative Sciences Unit, and. 2. Department of Neurology, PLA Army General Hospital, Beijing, China. 3. Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine. 4. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University. 5. Department of Radiology, Cardiovascular Imaging Section, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto. 6. Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA. 7. Dipartimento di Radiologia, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to characterize the relationship between computed tomography angiography imaging characteristics of coronary artery and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) score. METHODS: We retrospectively identified all patients who underwent a coronary computed tomography angiography at our institution from December 2013 to July 2016, then we calculated the 10-year ASCVD score. We characterized the relationship between coronary artery imaging findings and ASCVD risk score. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-one patients met our inclusion criteria. Patients with a 10-year ASCVD score of 7.5% or greater had significantly more arterial segments showing stenosis (46.4%, P = 0.008) and significantly higher maximal plaque thickness (1.25 vs 0.53, P = 0.001). However, among 56 patients with a 10-year ASCVD score of 7.5% or greater, 30 (53.6%) had no arterial stenosis. Furthermore, among the patients with a 10-year ASCVD score of less than 7.5%, 24 (25.3%) had some arterial stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: There is some concordance but not a perfect overlap between 10-year ASCVD risk scores and coronary artery imaging findings.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to characterize the relationship between computed tomography angiography imaging characteristics of coronary artery and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) score. METHODS: We retrospectively identified all patients who underwent a coronary computed tomography angiography at our institution from December 2013 to July 2016, then we calculated the 10-year ASCVD score. We characterized the relationship between coronary artery imaging findings and ASCVD risk score. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-one patients met our inclusion criteria. Patients with a 10-year ASCVD score of 7.5% or greater had significantly more arterial segments showing stenosis (46.4%, P = 0.008) and significantly higher maximal plaque thickness (1.25 vs 0.53, P = 0.001). However, among 56 patients with a 10-year ASCVD score of 7.5% or greater, 30 (53.6%) had no arterial stenosis. Furthermore, among the patients with a 10-year ASCVD score of less than 7.5%, 24 (25.3%) had some arterial stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: There is some concordance but not a perfect overlap between 10-year ASCVD risk scores and coronary artery imaging findings.
Authors: Neil J Stone; Jennifer G Robinson; Alice H Lichtenstein; C Noel Bairey Merz; Conrad B Blum; Robert H Eckel; Anne C Goldberg; David Gordon; Daniel Levy; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Patrick McBride; J Sanford Schwartz; Susan T Shero; Sidney C Smith; Karol Watson; Peter W F Wilson; Karen M Eddleman; Nicole M Jarrett; Ken LaBresh; Lev Nevo; Janusz Wnek; Jeffrey L Anderson; Jonathan L Halperin; Nancy M Albert; Biykem Bozkurt; Ralph G Brindis; Lesley H Curtis; David DeMets; Judith S Hochman; Richard J Kovacs; E Magnus Ohman; Susan J Pressler; Frank W Sellke; Win-Kuang Shen; Sidney C Smith; Gordon F Tomaselli Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-11-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Joseph A Salami; Haider Warraich; Javier Valero-Elizondo; Erica S Spatz; Nihar R Desai; Jamal S Rana; Salim S Virani; Ron Blankstein; Amit Khera; Michael J Blaha; Roger S Blumenthal; Donald Lloyd-Jones; Khurram Nasir Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2017-01-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Suzette E Elias-Smale; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart Proença; Michael T Koller; Maryam Kavousi; Frank J A van Rooij; Myriam G Hunink; Ewout W Steyerberg; Albert Hofman; Matthijs Oudkerk; Jacqueline C M Witteman Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2010-10-19 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: David C Goff; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Glen Bennett; Sean Coady; Ralph B D'Agostino; Raymond Gibbons; Philip Greenland; Daniel T Lackland; Daniel Levy; Christopher J O'Donnell; Jennifer G Robinson; J Sanford Schwartz; Susan T Shero; Sidney C Smith; Paul Sorlie; Neil J Stone; Peter W F Wilson Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-11-12 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Aaron R Folsom; Richard A Kronmal; Robert C Detrano; Daniel H O'Leary; Diane E Bild; David A Bluemke; Matthew J Budoff; Kiang Liu; Steven Shea; Moyses Szklo; Russell P Tracy; Karol E Watson; Gregory L Burke Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2008-06-23
Authors: Mark Helfand; David I Buckley; Michele Freeman; Rongwei Fu; Kevin Rogers; Craig Fleming; Linda L Humphrey Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2009-10-06 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Rajesh Tota-Maharaj; Michael J Blaha; Ron Blankstein; Michael G Silverman; John Eng; Leslee J Shaw; Roger S Blumenthal; Matthew J Budoff; Khurram Nasir Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2014-09-15 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Tarun K Mittal; Alison Pottle; Ed Nicol; Mahmoud Barbir; Ben Ariff; Saeed Mirsadraee; Michael Dubowitz; Diana A Gorog; Piers Clifford; Soroosh Firoozan; Robert Smith; Simon Dubrey; Harmeet Chana; Jaymin Shah; Nigel Stephens; Christopher Travill; Andrew Kelion; Mini Pakkal; Adam Timmis Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 6.875