| Literature DB >> 30406676 |
Wolfram Meier-Augenstein1, Arndt Schimmelmann2.
Abstract
Many scientific publications about stable isotope ratios suffer from flawed practices regarding calibration and normalisation of raw δ values in conjunction with prescribed δ values of reference materials. Violations of the identical treatment principle with regards to samples and standards (i.e. reference materials) and lack of adherence to SI-mandated and IUPAC-recommended nomenclature exacerbate the widespread problem of lackadaisical analytical practice and reporting. Science is supposed to strive for exactness, whereas ambiguity and jargon confound interdisciplinary communication. This contribution aims to expose typical misconceptions and avoidable errors and offers guidance toward the reproducible generation of isotope data, isotopic scale normalisation, and proper data reporting. We offer a comprehensive overview of sources of light stable isotope reference materials to best match sample matrices encountered by stable isotope practitioners with chemically similar reference materials.Keywords: Calibration; carbon-13; hydrogen-2; isotope abundance; nitrogen-15; overview; oxygen-18; reference material; scale anchor; scale normalisation; terminology
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30406676 DOI: 10.1080/10256016.2018.1538137
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Isotopes Environ Health Stud ISSN: 1025-6016 Impact factor: 1.675