Literature DB >> 30406579

Erosion Rate of the Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Device Is Much Higher for Anal Incontinence than for Antireflux.

Jean-Luc Faucheron1, Pierre-Yves Sage2, Bertrand Trilling2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2018        PMID： 30406579     DOI： 10.1007/s11605-018-4032-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN： 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


× No keyword cloud information.
  10 in total

1.  Response to Barussaud et al.: the magnetic anal sphincter in faecal incontinence, is initial success sustained over time?

Authors:  Valérie Bridoux; Guillaume Gourcerol; Anne-Marie Leroi; Philippe Ducrotte; Francis Michot; Jean-Jacques Tuech
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.788

2.  Long-term Experience of Magnetic Anal Sphincter Augmentation in Patients With Fecal Incontinence.

Authors:  Jeremy Sugrue; Paul-Antoine Lehur; Robert D Madoff; Shane McNevin; Steen Buntzen; Søren Laurberg; Anders Mellgren
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  SaFaRI: sacral nerve stimulation versus the Fenix® magnetic sphincter augmentation for adult faecal incontinence: a randomised investigation.

Authors:  Paul Antoine Lehur; Vincent Wyart; Valery Pierre Riche
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Removal of the Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Device: Surgical Technique and Results of a Single-center Cohort Study.

Authors:  Emanuele Asti; Stefano Siboni; Veronica Lazzari; Gianluca Bonitta; Andrea Sironi; Luigi Bonavina
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Worldwide Experience with Erosion of the Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Device.

Authors:  Evan T Alicuben; Reginald C W Bell; Blair A Jobe; F P Buckley; C Daniel Smith; Casey J Graybeal; John C Lipham
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Magnetic anal sphincter augmentation for the treatment of fecal incontinence: a preliminary report from a feasibility study.

Authors:  Paul-Antoine Lehur; Shane McNevin; Steen Buntzen; Anders F Mellgren; Soeren Laurberg; Robert D Madoff
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Magnetic anal sphincter augmentation in patients with severe fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Faramarz Pakravan; Christian Helmes
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Technical and functional results of the artificial bowel sphincter for treatment of severe fecal incontinence: is there any benefit for the patient?

Authors:  Benjamin Darnis; Jean-Luc Faucheron; Henri Damon; Xavier Barth
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  The magnetic anal sphincter in faecal incontinence: is initial success sustained over time?

Authors:  M-L Barussaud; S Mantoo; V Wyart; G Meurette; P-A Lehur
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.788

10.  SaFaRI: sacral nerve stimulation versus the FENIX magnetic sphincter augmentation for adult faecal incontinence: a randomised investigation.

Authors:  Annabelle E Williams; Julie Croft; Vicky Napp; Neil Corrigan; Julia M Brown; Claire Hulme; Steven R Brown; Jen Lodge; David Protheroe; David G Jayne
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.571
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.