Uday C Ghoshal1, Deepakshi Srivastava2, Asha Misra2. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, 226 014, India. udayghoshal@gmail.com. 2. Department of Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, 226 014, India.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:Gut microbe-derived methane may slow colon transit causing chronic constipation (CC). Effect of rifaximin on breath methane and slow-transit CC was evaluated. METHOD: Bristol stool form, frequency, colon transit time (CTT), and breath methane were evaluated in 23 patients with CC (10 patients with constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome [IBS-C], 13 functional constipation, Rome III) and m-ethane production compared with 68 non-constipating IBS. Methane-producing CC (basal ≥ 10 PPM and/or post-lactulose rise by > 10 PPM) was randomized (double-blind) to rifaximin (400-mg thrice/day, 2-weeks) or placebo. Stool forms, frequency, breath methane, and CTT were recorded afterward. RESULTS: CC patients tended to be methane producer more often (13/23 [56.5%] vs. 25/68 [36.5%], p = 0.07) and had greater area under curve (AUC) for methane (2415 [435-23,580] vs. 1335 [0-6562.5], p = 0.02) than non-constipating IBS. Methane producers (8/13 [61.5%]) and 5/10 (50%) non-producers had abnormal CTT (marker retention: 36-h, 53 [0-60] vs. 19 [8-56], p = 0.06; 60-h, 16 [0-57] vs. 13 [3-56], p = 0.877). Six and 7/13 methane producers were randomized to rifaximin and placebo, respectively. Rifaximin reduced AUC for methane more (6697.5 [1777.5-23,580] vs. 2617.5 [562.5-19,867.5], p = 0.005) than placebo (3945 [2415-12,952.5] vs. 3720 [502.5-9210], p = 0.118) at 1 month. CTT normalized in 4/6 (66.7%) on rifaximin (36-h retention, 54 [44-57] vs. 36 [23-60], p = 0.05; 60-h, 45 [3-57] vs. 14 [11-51], p = 0.09) but none on placebo (p = 0.02) (36-h, 31 [0-60] vs. 25 [0-45], p = 0.078; 60-h, 6 [0-54] vs. 12 [0-28], p = 0.2). Weekly stool frequency (3 [1-9] and 7 [1-14], p = 0.05) and forms improved with rifaximin than placebo. CONCLUSION:Rifaximin improves CC by altering methane production and colon transit. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial Registry, India: REF/2012/01/003216 ᅟ ᅟ.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Gut microbe-derived methane may slow colon transit causing chronic constipation (CC). Effect of rifaximin on breath methane and slow-transit CC was evaluated. METHOD: Bristol stool form, frequency, colon transit time (CTT), and breath methane were evaluated in 23 patients with CC (10 patients with constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome [IBS-C], 13 functional constipation, Rome III) and m-ethane production compared with 68 non-constipating IBS. Methane-producing CC (basal ≥ 10 PPM and/or post-lactulose rise by > 10 PPM) was randomized (double-blind) to rifaximin (400-mg thrice/day, 2-weeks) or placebo. Stool forms, frequency, breath methane, and CTT were recorded afterward. RESULTS: CC patients tended to be methane producer more often (13/23 [56.5%] vs. 25/68 [36.5%], p = 0.07) and had greater area under curve (AUC) for methane (2415 [435-23,580] vs. 1335 [0-6562.5], p = 0.02) than non-constipating IBS. Methane producers (8/13 [61.5%]) and 5/10 (50%) non-producers had abnormal CTT (marker retention: 36-h, 53 [0-60] vs. 19 [8-56], p = 0.06; 60-h, 16 [0-57] vs. 13 [3-56], p = 0.877). Six and 7/13 methane producers were randomized to rifaximin and placebo, respectively. Rifaximin reduced AUC for methane more (6697.5 [1777.5-23,580] vs. 2617.5 [562.5-19,867.5], p = 0.005) than placebo (3945 [2415-12,952.5] vs. 3720 [502.5-9210], p = 0.118) at 1 month. CTT normalized in 4/6 (66.7%) on rifaximin (36-h retention, 54 [44-57] vs. 36 [23-60], p = 0.05; 60-h, 45 [3-57] vs. 14 [11-51], p = 0.09) but none on placebo (p = 0.02) (36-h, 31 [0-60] vs. 25 [0-45], p = 0.078; 60-h, 6 [0-54] vs. 12 [0-28], p = 0.2). Weekly stool frequency (3 [1-9] and 7 [1-14], p = 0.05) and forms improved with rifaximin than placebo. CONCLUSION:Rifaximin improves CC by altering methane production and colon transit. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial Registry, India: REF/2012/01/003216 ᅟ ᅟ.
Authors: Mark Pimentel; Henry C Lin; Pedram Enayati; Brian van den Burg; Hyo-Rang Lee; Jin H Chen; Sandy Park; Yuthana Kong; Jeffrey Conklin Journal: Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol Date: 2005-11-17 Impact factor: 4.052
Authors: Anthony Lembo; Mark Pimentel; Satish S Rao; Philip Schoenfeld; Brooks Cash; Leonard B Weinstock; Craig Paterson; Enoch Bortey; William P Forbes Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2016-08-13 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: M Matsunami; T Tarui; K Mitani; K Nagasawa; O Fukushima; K Okubo; S Yoshida; M Takemura; A Kawabata Journal: Gut Date: 2008-10-13 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Kanchana Myneedu; Abhizith Deoker; Max J Schmulson; Mohammad Bashashati Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2019-07-30 Impact factor: 4.623
Authors: Arjun Gandhi; Ayesha Shah; Michael P Jones; Natasha Koloski; Nicholas J Talley; Mark Morrison; Gerald Holtmann Journal: Gut Microbes Date: 2021 Jan-Dec
Authors: David Avelar Rodriguez; Paul MacDaragh Ryan; Erick Manuel Toro Monjaraz; Jaime Alfonso Ramirez Mayans; Eamonn Martin Quigley Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2019-09-04 Impact factor: 3.418