Literature DB >> 30406289

Patient- versus physician-reported outcomes in prostate cancer patients receiving hypofractionated radiotherapy within a randomized controlled trial.

Elke Rammant1, Piet Ost2, Martijn Swimberghe2, Barbara Vanderstraeten2, Nicolaas Lumen3, Karel Decaestecker3, Renée Bultijnck4, Gert De Meerleer4, Camille Sarrazyn4, Roos Colman5, Valérie Fonteyne2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The risk of developing acute radiotherapy(RT)-induced side effects may increase with hypofractionated RT. To detect treatment-related side effects, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) might be more reliable than physician-reported outcomes. Therefore, we tried to evaluate the rate of agreement between urinary and gastrointestinal (GI) side effects and the prevalence of side effects reported by patients and by physicians.
METHODS: Data from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing two hypofractionated RT schedules were used. Urinary (nocturia, incontinence, frequency, dysuria, and urgency) and GI (obstruction, diarrhea, vomiting, nausea, bloating, hemorragia, and incontinence) symptoms measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 and PR-25 were used for PROs. The same symptoms were scored by the physician using the Common Terminology Criteria Adverse Events v4.0. Outcomes were reported at baseline, end of treatment, month 1, and month 3. PROs and physician-reported outcomes were converted in two categories (0 = no symptoms; 1 = symptoms of any severity) and were correlated using the kappa (κ) correlation statistics. Values below 0.40 were considered low agreement. In addition, the prevalence of symptoms was calculated.
RESULTS: Data from 160 patients were used. The mean value for Cohen's κ was 0.31 (ranging between 0.04 and 0.55) and 0.23 (ranging between 0.04 and 0.47) for urinary and GI symptoms, respectively. Except for three symptoms at baseline, all symptoms reported by patients were higher than those reported by physicians.
CONCLUSION: There is low agreement between symptoms reported by patients and physicians, with high rates of underreporting by the physician.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Patient-reported outcomes; Prostate cancer; Quality of life; Radiotherapy; Urinary and gastrointestinal toxicity

Year:  2018        PMID: 30406289     DOI: 10.1007/s00066-018-1395-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol        ISSN: 0179-7158            Impact factor:   3.621


  12 in total

1.  Comparative toxicity outcomes of proton-beam therapy versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer in the postoperative setting.

Authors:  Patricia Mae G Santos; Andrew R Barsky; Wei-Ting Hwang; Curtiland Deville; Xingmei Wang; Stefan Both; Justin E Bekelman; John P Christodouleas; Neha Vapiwala
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  The Prostate Cancer Outcomes (PCO) study in prostate cancer centres certified by the German Cancer Society.

Authors:  Christoph Kowalski; Günther Carl; Günter Feick; Simone Wesselmann
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  A narrative review of current evidence supporting the implementation of electronic patient-reported outcome measures in the management of chronic diseases.

Authors:  Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi; Devika Nair; John Devin Peipert; Kara Schick-Makaroff; Istvan Mucsi
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 5.091

4.  Development and Validation of a Comprehensive Multivariate Dosimetric Model for Predicting Late Genitourinary Toxicity Following Prostate Cancer Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Luca F Valle; Dan Ruan; Audrey Dang; Rebecca G Levin-Epstein; Ankur P Patel; Joanne B Weidhaas; Nicholas G Nickols; Percy P Lee; Daniel A Low; X Sharon Qi; Christopher R King; Michael L Steinberg; Patrick A Kupelian; Minsong Cao; Amar U Kishan
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  A comparison of outcomes for patients with intermediate and high risk prostate cancer treated with low dose rate and high dose rate brachytherapy in combination with external beam radiotherapy.

Authors:  Finbar Slevin; Sree Lakshmi Rodda; Peter Bownes; Louise Murray; David Bottomley; Clare Wilkinson; Ese Adiotomre; Bashar Al-Qaisieh; Emma Dugdale; Oliver Hulson; Joshua Mason; Jonathan Smith; Ann M Henry
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-10-14

6.  Treating the primary in low burden metastatic prostate cancer: Where do we stand?

Authors:  Hua-Chun Luo; Zhi-Chao Fu; Xin-Peng Wang; Lv-Juan Cai; Feng-Mei Wang; Qin Yin; Guishan Lin; Zhong-Hua Chen; Shao-Guang Liao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Bothersome Hematospermia Following Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Sarthak Shah; Tamir Sholklapper; Michael Creswell; Abigail Pepin; Jonathan Cantalino; Ryan Andrew Hankins; Simeng Suy; Sean P Collins
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Assessing concordance between patient-reported and investigator-reported CTCAE after proton beam therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Roman O Kowalchuk; David Hillman; Thomas B Daniels; Carlos E Vargas; Jean-Claude M Rwigema; William W Wong; Bradley J Stish; Amylou C Dueck; Richard Choo
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-09-15

9.  Acceptance of physical activity monitoring in cancer patients during radiotherapy, the GIROfit phase 2 pilot trial.

Authors:  S Boeke; F Hauth; S G Fischer; H Lautenbacher; V Bizu; D Zips; C Gani
Journal:  Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-04-05

10.  Prospective Randomized Phase II Study of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) vs. Conventional Fractionated Radiotherapy (CFRT) for Chinese Patients with Early-Stage Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Darren M C Poon; Daisy Lam; Kenneth C W Wong; Cheuk-Man Chu; Michael Cheung; Frankie Mo; Joyce Suen; Chi-Fai Ng; Anthony T C Chan
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 3.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.