Literature DB >> 30405901

An observational study of Chinese adults with relapsed/refractory Philadelphia-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Jun Ma1,1, Ting Liu2,2, Jie Jin3,3, Jianda Hu4,4, Qifa Liu5,5, Jianxiang Wang6,6, Zhixiang Shen7,7, Xin Du8,8, Bin Jiang9,9, Xianhua Meng10,11,10,11.   

Abstract

AIM: Chinese adults with relapsed/refractory Philadelphia chromosome-negative B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph- ALL) have poor outcomes. PATIENTS &
METHODS: We conducted a nationwide, retrospective, observational study to assess outcomes in this patient population.
RESULTS: Of the 270 enrolled patients, 31% of patients at last salvage achieved complete remission (CR) or CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh), with median time to CR/CRh of 30 days and median CR/CRh duration of 2.7 months. The CR/CRh rate was more favorable with earlier versus later lines of salvage (41, 24 and 17% at first, second and third or later salvages, respectively).
CONCLUSION: This dataset serves as an important reference of real-world outcomes using currently available chemotherapy regimens for high-risk Chinese adults with relapsed/refractory Ph- ALL.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ALL; China; Philadelphia chromosome-negative B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia; acute lymphoblastic leukemia; chemotherapy; relapsed/refractory; retrospective observational study

Year:  2018        PMID: 30405901      PMCID: PMC6219430          DOI: 10.2217/ijh-2018-0006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Hematol Oncol        ISSN: 2045-1393


The proportion of Chinese patients with relapsed/refractory ALL who achieved complete remission (CR)/CR with partial hematologic recovery after salvage therapy and who received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant following CR/CR with partial hematologic recovery after salvage therapy is consistent with outcomes reported from US observational studies. Data from this observational study of real-world clinical outcomes may provide useful reference material for improving the treatment of this high-risk patient population and for further clinical trials in China. Relapsed/refractory (R/R) Philadelphia chromosome-negative B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph- ALL) is a rare, aggressive and heterogeneous disease for which there are limited treatment options [1,2]. In China, the incidence of ALL in adults is approximately 0.6 per 100,000, and there is notable geographic variation across districts; in Shanghai, one of the largest cities in China, the overall incidence of ALL is 0.81 per 100,000 [3,4]. Globally, the treatment of adults with ALL has improved over the past three decades, with complete remission (CR) rates of 85–90% and long-term overall survival (OS) rates of 30–50% [5-7]. Despite these advances, a high proportion of patients relapse, with remission rates of 31–44% after first salvage and 18–25% after second salvage [8-14]. There is no standard chemotherapy salvage regimen for adults with R/R ALL. Salvage therapy varies by first salvage treatment choice, depth and duration of previous response, overall patient health, regional practice patterns and physician preference [12,13,15]. Long-term disease-free survival and cure in 7–24% of adults with R/R ALL generally occur only after patients have received an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT) [8,13,14,16,17]. Outcomes in patients with R/R ALL are even less favorable in China than in western countries [18]. In 2016, a panel of Chinese medical professionals published the Chinese Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia [19]. This panel reported that the diagnosis and treatment of adult ALL in China required improvement, as most treatment centers lacked a systematic treatment plan and patient outcomes were not satisfactory. Their treatment recommendations for this patient population are induction therapy with regimens including at least vincristine or vinblastine, anthracyclines/anthraquinones and corticosteroids; intensive consolidation therapy following CR; alloHSCT and maintenance therapy; and participation in a clinical trial [19]. We conducted a nationwide, multicenter, retrospective, observational study to determine hematological remission rates and survival outcomes of Chinese adults with R/R Ph- ALL treated with currently available chemotherapy regimens. The primary aim was to collect real-world retrospective data on the clinical treatment of adults with R/R ALL and to provide a reference for the further study of adult R/R ALL treatment in China, with the long-term goal of improving outcomes in this high-risk patient group.

Patients & methods

Study design

This was a retrospective, noninterventional, observational study to collect data on clinical outcomes from Chinese adults who had R/R B-precursor ALL and confirmed Philadelphia chromosome status and who were enrolled from 14 major hematology centers in China (Supplementary Table 1). Eligible patients were at least 15 years old at the time of diagnosis and had at least one evaluable response after salvage therapy. Patients who had achieved CR on initial induction therapy were required to have an evaluable duration of remission. Patients were excluded if they had central nervous system involvement or isolated extramedullary relapse. This study was conducted in accordance with all applicable regulatory guidelines. The protocol was approved by each study center’s institutional review board or independent ethics committee.

Endpoints

The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with early relapsed (first remission duration of ≤12 months) or primary refractory Ph- B-precursor ALL who achieved CR with either full or partial hematologic recovery (CR/CRh) after the last salvage therapy. Secondary endpoints included CR/CRh after the first salvage therapy, and CR with full, partial or incomplete hematologic recovery (CR/CRh/CRi), duration of CR/CRh, duration of CR/CRh/CRi and rate of alloHSCT realization after CR/CRh following first and last salvage therapies. CR was defined as the absence of circulating blasts, absence of extramedullary disease (i.e., no lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly, skin/gum infiltration, testicular mass or central nervous system involvement), trilineage hematopoiesis and less than 5% blasts by bone marrow assessment, absolute neutrophil counts (ANCs) greater than 1.0 × 109/l, platelet counts greater than 100 × 109/l and no recurrence for at least 4 weeks. CRh criteria were the same as those for CR except for ANC greater than 0.5 × 109/l and platelet count greater than 50 × 109/l. CRi criteria were the same as those for CR except for ANC less than 1.0 × 109/l and platelet count less than 100 × 109/l. Safety data were not collected as part of this study.

Data collection

Clinical data were collected retrospectively from each patient’s original medical records, anonymized and entered into an electronic data collection (EDC) system. Unique record identifiers were applied to the anonymized data to facilitate data quality control procedures. The EDC system was designed to check each variable as well as logical relationships between variables during data collection. Independent study monitors regularly performed quality control checks to ensure consistency between the original medical records and data entered into the EDC system. Investigators applied a rating of data completeness to variables to identify potential misclassification or differences in data provision among sites.

Statistical analyses

The sample size was based on calculations that would provide reasonable statistical precision and a margin of error of ±9.8% to ±6.4% for the estimation of CR/CRh. The primary Ph- analysis set included patients with R/R Ph- ALL, defined as meeting one of the following criteria: primary refractory, relapsed within 12 months of first CR, relapsed after first or subsequent salvage therapy or relapsed within 12 months of alloHSCT. Continuous variables are summarized using nonmissing sample size, mean, standard deviation, median, interquartile range and range. Categorical variables are summarized using sample size and proportions in each category. Point estimates for efficacy endpoints are accompanied by two-sided 95% CIs. The primary analysis was performed on reported data from the last salvage therapy; secondary analyses were based on data from the first salvage therapy. Subgroup analyses assessed the effects of covariates (i.e., line of treatment, refractory status, prior alloHSCT, age, sex, period of initial diagnosis, bone marrow blasts at diagnosis and white blood cell count at diagnosis) with CR/CRh. Univariate and multivariate models used Cox regression analysis to evaluate the relationships between CR/CRh and covariates. Duration of CR/CRh was estimated based on patients with CR/CRh in the primary analysis set and defined from the time when the criteria for CR/CRh were first met until documented hematological relapse or death due to disease progression. Patients who were alive at the end of the study were censored on their last disease assessment date.

Results

Patient characteristics

A total of 632 patients with R/R B-precursor ALL were identified from medical records spanning 2005–2014. Among the 458 patients who met all eligibility criteria, 270 had R/R Ph- ALL (17% were primary refractory, 59% relapsed within 12 months of first CR, 18% relapsed twice or more and 6% relapsed within 12 months after HSCT) and were included in the primary Ph- analysis set (Figure 1). Baseline patient characteristics are presented in Table 1. Approximately half of the patients were male, and the median (range) age was 29 (15–73) years, with the majority younger than 35 years old. 24 (9%) patients had received prior HSCT (eight autologous HSCT and 16 alloHSCT), and 246 (91%) patients had not received prior HSCT; the majority of patients had not received prior salvage therapy. At diagnosis, the median (range) bone marrow blast percentage was 84% (1–99), and the majority of patients (73%) had ≥50% bone marrow blasts; at last salvage, 39% of patients had ≥50% bone marrow blasts. The last salvage, first salvage and induction regimens in this patient population were diverse, with no specific standard-of-care regimens identified (Supplementary Table 2).

Patient disposition.

Data from the primary Ph- patient population are reported.

†Some patients had more than one reason for exclusion.

ALL: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia; CR1: Complete remission after the first induction therapy; HSCT: Hematopoietic stem cell transplant; Ph-: Philadelphia chromosome-negative; Ph+: Philadelphia chromosome-positive.

Patient characteristics at diagnosis and at last salvage.

Patient characteristicsPh- patients (n = 270)
At diagnosis

Sex, n (%): 

– Female125 (46)

– Male145 (54)

Median (range) age, years29 (15–73)

Age group, years, n (%): 

– <35171 (63)

– 35 to ≤5585 (32)

– >5514 (5)

Bone marrow blasts, n (%): 

– ≤5%6 (2)

– >5% to <50%33 (12)

– ≥50%197 (73)

– Not available34 (13)

White blood cell count, n (%): 

– <30,000/μl169 (63)

– ≥30,000/μl75 (28)

– Not available26 (10)

At last salvage

Prior HSCT, n (%): 

– Autologous8 (3)

– Allogeneic16 (6)

Previous lines of salvage 

Prior HSCT, n (%):24 (9)

– 018 (7)

– 16 (2)

– ≥20

No prior HSCT, n (%):246 (91)

– 0195 (72)

– 145 (17)

– ≥26 (2)

Bone marrow blasts, n (%): 

– ≤5%2 (<1)

– >5% to <50%149 (55)

– ≥50%105 (39)

– Not available14 (5)

HSCT: Hematopoietic stem cell transplant; Ph-: Philadelphia chromosome-negative.

Patient disposition.

Data from the primary Ph- patient population are reported. †Some patients had more than one reason for exclusion. ALL: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia; CR1: Complete remission after the first induction therapy; HSCT: Hematopoietic stem cell transplant; Ph-: Philadelphia chromosome-negative; Ph+: Philadelphia chromosome-positive. HSCT: Hematopoietic stem cell transplant; Ph-: Philadelphia chromosome-negative.

Response

31% (95% CI: 26–37; n = 84) of patients achieved CR/CRh at last salvage (primary endpoint), with 21% (95% CI: 17–27; n = 58) achieving CR and 10% (95% CI: 6–14; n = 26) achieving CRh. Overall, 38% of patients achieved CR/CRh/CRi at last salvage. The proportion of patients who achieved CR/CRh or CR/CRh/CRi at first salvage was 41 and 48%, respectively. Among patients who had CR/CRh, 25% at first salvage and 29% at last salvage received an alloHSCT after achieving CR/CRh (Table 2).

Hematologic response and duration of response.

Patient characteristicsFirst salvageLast salvage
CR/CRh:  

– n/N104/27084/270

– % (95% CI)39 (33–45)31 (26–37)

alloHSCT after CR/CRh:  

– n/N26/10424/84

– % (95% CI)25 (17–34)29 (19–39)

CR/CRh/CRi:  

– n/N122/270102/270

– % (95% CI)45 (39–51)38 (32–44)

Median duration of CR/CRh, days (95% CI):87 (64–125); n = 11082 (60–117); n = 84

– Relapse, n (%)63 (57)39 (46)

– Death, n (%)8 (7)9 (11)

– Censored, n (%)39 (36)36 (43)

Median time to CR/CRh, days (range)30 (6–275)30 (6–291)

Median duration of CR/CRh/CRi, days (95% CI):117 (78–146); n = 12887 (67–125); n = 128

– Relapse, n (%)60 (47)61 (48)

– Death, n (%)13 (10)13 (10)

– Censored, n (%)55 (43)54 (42)

alloHSCT: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant; CR: Complete remission; CRh: CR with partial hematologic recovery; CRi: CR with incomplete hematologic recovery; n/N: Number of responders/number of total patients within each subgroup.

alloHSCT: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant; CR: Complete remission; CRh: CR with partial hematologic recovery; CRi: CR with incomplete hematologic recovery; n/N: Number of responders/number of total patients within each subgroup. The median duration of CR/CRh and CR/CRh/CRi decreased from first to last salvage: from 87 to 82 days for CR/CRh and from 117 to 87 days for CR/CRh/CRi. The median time to CR/CRh was 30 days at first and last salvage (Table 2). Subgroup analyses of CR/CRh after first and last salvage therapy showed a significant difference in CR/CRh response and bone marrow blast percentage after first salvage (p = 0.013); 48% of patients with >5% to <50% bone marrow blasts achieved CR/CRh (Figure 2). No additional significant interactions between baseline covariates and CR/CRh were observed.

Complete remission/complete remission with partial hematologic recovery after first and last salvage among prespecified patient subgroups.

The vertical dashed line represents the point estimate for CR or CRh for the entire patient population.

alloHSCT: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant; CR: Complete remission; CRh: CR with partial hematologic recovery; n/N: Number of responders/number of total patients within each subgroup.

Complete remission/complete remission with partial hematologic recovery after first and last salvage among prespecified patient subgroups.

The vertical dashed line represents the point estimate for CR or CRh for the entire patient population. alloHSCT: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant; CR: Complete remission; CRh: CR with partial hematologic recovery; n/N: Number of responders/number of total patients within each subgroup. Minimal residual disease (MRD) information for patients who had achieved CR/CRh after first and last salvage therapy was available for 12 of 84 and 16 of 84 patients, respectively, among whom 75% (9 of 12) and 81% (13 of 16) achieved an MRD response.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first retrospective, multicenter, observational study designed to evaluate real-world clinical outcomes in adult patients with R/R Ph- ALL in China. The large patient population from multiple sites across China provided a broad regional representation of patient outcomes and treatment regimens. The majority of study patients had relapsed within 12 months of first CR (59%) and had no prior salvage therapy or HSCT (72%). As expected, the proportion of patients who achieved CR/CRh was higher in first salvage versus last salvage (41 vs 31%, respectively). These outcomes are consistent with those reported from two observational studies of R/R ALL conducted in the USA that reported a CR rate of 31% after salvage therapy [12] and CR rates of 34 and 18% after first and second salvage, respectively [10]. In our study, 29% of patients received alloHSCT following CR/CRh after salvage therapy, which is consistent with results from a US observational study in which 25% of patients received HSCT following a second CR [12]. The outcomes from our study are also comparable to those observed in clinical trials of patients receiving intensive chemotherapy regimens in western countries. For example, the CR rate after salvage was 33–42% from a pooled analysis of two clinical trials conducted in Germany [8]. A limited number of observational studies have evaluated outcomes in adults with R/R Ph- ALL in China. For patients who received aclarubicin, cytarabine and GC-SF; high-dose colony-stimulating factor; and hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin and dexamethasone (hyper-CVAD) regimens, CR rates ranged from 45 to 52% [20]. In a retrospective study in Chinese patients who had relapsed after haploidentical HSCT following chemotherapy plus modified donor lymphocyte infusion, a significantly higher CR rate (64 vs 12.5%) and longer median OS (5.57 vs 2.50 months) were reported compared with chemotherapy alone [21]. The patient population evaluated in our study received a wide variety of intensive combination chemotherapy regimens during induction and salvage therapies, reflecting the heterogeneity of current clinical practices in China with no identified standard of care. Of note, outcomes observed in this Chinese population are consistent with data from western populations treated with similar regimens, a finding that is not totally unexpected, since data were collected from major hematology centers in China. Since our study was completed, immunotherapies such as blinatumomab (an anti-CD3/CD19 bispecific T-cell engager antibody construct approved in a number of countries for R/R Ph- ALL) and the investigational therapies inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO, a CD22 antibody–drug conjugate) and CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cells have improved outcomes in R/R ALL [22-36]. In a randomized Phase III study, blinatumomab monotherapy demonstrated significantly higher CR/CRh/CRi remission rates (44 vs 25%; p < 0.001) and significantly longer median OS (7.7 vs 4.0 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.71; 95% CI: 0.55–0.93; p = 0.01) versus standard-of-care chemotherapy in adults with high-risk R/R B-precursor ALL [25]. Among responders, 76% of patients who received blinatumomab and 48% of patients who received chemotherapy also achieved a complete MRD response [25]. In the USA, blinatumomab is included in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia as the preferred (category 1) treatment option for patients with Ph- ALL. Among the investigational agents for ALL, INO demonstrated a significantly higher CR versus chemotherapy in patients with relapsed ALL in the first and second salvage treatment settings (81 vs 29%; p < 0.001) and a significantly longer median progression-free survival (5.0 vs 1.8 months; p < 0.001) [9]. CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cells have demonstrated robust clinical activity in ALL, with CR rates ranging from 70 to 90% across independent studies, including one in China reporting a CR rate of 87% [37], and rapid tumor eradication and achievement of MRD-negative CR [28,29,38,39]. Although our study was not designed to collect data on MRD, 12 and 16 CR/CRh responders after first and last salvage, respectively, had available MRD data, among whom 75% (9 of 12) and 81% (13 of 16) achieved an MRD response. As patients with MRD persistence have a higher risk for hematologic relapse, MRD analysis will help to determine the optimal treatment approach for this patient population as more targeted therapies become available in China. For example, blinatumomab treatment of patients with MRD-positive ALL resulted in a complete MRD response rate of 78%, which was associated with longer OS and relapse-free survival compared with those who did not achieve a complete MRD response [40]. A number of baseline factors have been associated with outcomes in patients with ALL, including age and baseline percentage of bone marrow blasts [8,10,12-14,18,41-45]. We identified significant correlations between percentage of bone marrow blasts and CR/CRh at first salvage. However, the relatively small size of each subgroup may have prevented the identification of other known predictors of response in this patient population. Our study has some limitations, which include potential information bias due to differences in reporting among study centers and selection bias due to disproportionate enrollment of patients in certain risk groups. We minimized selection bias by only including patients with confirmed R/R ALL and by performing subgroup analyses. Also, the analysis of endpoints may have been confounded by clinical factors such as time to first relapse. Given that the timeframe for data collection spanned 9 years, treatment patterns may have evolved over that time period. Another key limitation is the study’s endpoint. Although OS would have been a more appropriate primary endpoint for our study, CR/CRh was chosen because follow-up information regarding patient survival was unreliable or missing for most of the patients. Finally, the highly specialized institutions selected for our study may not reflect ‘real-world’ treatments for many patients in China – at the time our study was conducted, there was no national or provincial registry for ALL, and many patients did not receive adequate treatment due to limited medical resources. In summary, treatment of Chinese patients with R/R ALL is heterogeneous with no identified standard of care, as evidenced by the diverse array of intensive combination chemotherapy regimens utilized during induction and salvage therapy. Although the proportion of Chinese patients with R/R ALL who achieved CR/CRh after salvage therapy and who received alloHSCT following CR/CRh after salvage therapy is consistent with that observed in observational studies of western populations treated with similar regimens, new treatment strategies are required to improve efficacy outcomes in adults with R/R Ph- ALL in China. We believe that data from this observational study of real-world clinical outcomes will provide useful reference material for improving the treatment of this high-risk patient population and for further clinical trials in China. Click here for additional data file.
  43 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of Adult ALL according to protocols of the German Multicenter Study Group for Adult ALL (GMALL).

Authors:  N Gökbuget; D Hoelzer; R Arnold; A Böhme; C R Bartram; M Freund; A Ganser; M Kneba; W Langer; T Lipp; W D Ludwig; G Maschmeyer; H Rieder; E Thiel; A Weiss; D Messerer
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.722

2.  Efficacy of low-dose cytarabine and aclarubicin in combination with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (CAG regimen) compared to Hyper-CVAD regimen as salvage chemotherapy in relapsed/refractory Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Limin Liu; Wenjing Jiao; Yanming Zhang; Qi Qu; Xiaoli Li; Depei Wu
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 3.156

3.  Long-term survival and T-cell kinetics in relapsed/refractory ALL patients who achieved MRD response after blinatumomab treatment.

Authors:  Gerhard Zugmaier; Nicola Gökbuget; Matthias Klinger; Andreas Viardot; Matthias Stelljes; Svenja Neumann; Heinz-A Horst; Reinhard Marks; Christoph Faul; Helmut Diedrich; Albrecht Reichle; Monika Brüggemann; Chris Holland; Margit Schmidt; Hermann Einsele; Ralf C Bargou; Max S Topp
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Chimeric antigen receptor T cells for sustained remissions in leukemia.

Authors:  Shannon L Maude; Noelle Frey; Pamela A Shaw; Richard Aplenc; David M Barrett; Nancy J Bunin; Anne Chew; Vanessa E Gonzalez; Zhaohui Zheng; Simon F Lacey; Yolanda D Mahnke; Jan J Melenhorst; Susan R Rheingold; Angela Shen; David T Teachey; Bruce L Levine; Carl H June; David L Porter; Stephan A Grupp
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Allogeneic cord blood transplantation for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: retrospective survey involving 256 patients in Japan.

Authors:  T Matsumura; M Kami; T Yamaguchi; K Yuji; E Kusumi; S Taniguchi; S Takahashi; M Okada; H Sakamaki; H Azuma; M Takanashi; H Kodo; S Kai; T Inoue-Nagamura; K Kato; S Kato
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 6.  The clinical potential of inotuzumab ozogamicin in relapsed and refractory acute lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Musa Yilmaz; Samantha Richard; Elias Jabbour
Journal:  Ther Adv Hematol       Date:  2015-10

7.  Complete Hematologic and Molecular Response in Adult Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive B-Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Following Treatment With Blinatumomab: Results From a Phase II, Single-Arm, Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Giovanni Martinelli; Nicolas Boissel; Patrice Chevallier; Oliver Ottmann; Nicola Gökbuget; Max S Topp; Adele K Fielding; Alessandro Rambaldi; Ellen K Ritchie; Cristina Papayannidis; Lulu Ren Sterling; Jonathan Benjamin; Anthony Stein
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Inotuzumab ozogamicin, an anti-CD22-calecheamicin conjugate, for refractory and relapsed acute lymphocytic leukaemia: a phase 2 study.

Authors:  Hagop Kantarjian; Deborah Thomas; Jeffrey Jorgensen; Elias Jabbour; Partow Kebriaei; Michael Rytting; Sergernne York; Farhad Ravandi; Monica Kwari; Stefan Faderl; Mary Beth Rios; Jorge Cortes; Luis Fayad; Robert Tarnai; Sa A Wang; Richard Champlin; Anjali Advani; Susan O'Brien
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 9.  Adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

Authors:  Renato Bassan; Gemma Gatta; Carlo Tondini; Roel Willemze
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.312

10.  Outcome of treatment after first relapse in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia initially treated by the LALA-94 trial.

Authors:  E Tavernier; J-M Boiron; F Huguet; K Bradstock; N Vey; T Kovacsovics; A Delannoy; N Fegueux; P Fenaux; A Stamatoullas; O Tournilhac; A Buzyn; O Reman; C Charrin; C Boucheix; J Gabert; V Lhéritier; J-P Vernant; H Dombret; X Thomas
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 11.528

View more
  2 in total

1.  Inotuzumab ozogamicin versus standard of care in Asian patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Naohito Fujishima; Toshiki Uchida; Yasushi Onishi; Chul Won Jung; Yeow Tee Goh; Kiyoshi Ando; Ming Chung Wang; Chiho Ono; Miyako Matsumizu; M Luisa Paccagnella; Barbara Sleight; Erik Vandendries; Yosuke Fujii; Masayuki Hino
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 2.490

2.  Welcome to Volume 8 of the International Journal of Hematologic Oncology.

Authors:  Jennifer Straiton
Journal:  Int J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2019-02-26
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.