Giovanni G Millare1, Michael Kwon2, Beth S Edeiken-Monroe2, J Matthew Debnam2. 1. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Wilford Hall Ambulatory Surgical Center, San Antonio, Texas, United States. 2. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Section of Neuroradiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States.
Abstract
PURPOSE: While metastasis to the thyroid from a primary cancer remote to the thyroid is uncommon, current imaging techniques have improved detection of these intrathyroid metastases. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 18F-PET/CT appearance of intrathyroid metastases and assess the impact of detection on patient management. METHODS: The 18F-PET/CT appearance of intrathyroid metastasis, including standardized uptake value (SUV), disease extent, and the effect on patient management following diagnosis were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria included 18F-PET/CT imaging and diagnosis of the intrathyroid metastasis matching the remote primary tumor. RESULTS: Intrathyroid metastasis were detected in 24 patients. The intrathyroid metastases presented on 18F-PET/CT as focal nodular uptake (n = 21), multiple nodular uptake (n = 2), or diffuse uptake/infiltration of the thyroid gland (n = 1). The SUV ranged between 3.9 and 42 (median 12.5 ± 7.5); in 2 patients, the FDG-avidity was minimal. On 18F-PET/CT, distant metastases were present outside the neck (n = 18), or limited to the neck (n = 6). In 2 of these 6 patients, the thyroid was the only site of metastatic disease. Due to the metastatic disease, the therapy was changed in 23 of 24 patients; 1 patient was lost to follow-up. CONCLUSION: In any patient with a previous or current history of an extrathyroid malignancy, an 18FDG-avid thyroid mass or diffuse infiltration of the thyroid on 18F-PET/CT should be considered a potential intrathyoid metastasis until proven otherwise. Knowledge of an intrathyroid metastasis may impact patient management, especially if the thyroid or neck are the only sites of metastatic disease.
PURPOSE: While metastasis to the thyroid from a primary cancer remote to the thyroid is uncommon, current imaging techniques have improved detection of these intrathyroid metastases. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 18F-PET/CT appearance of intrathyroid metastases and assess the impact of detection on patient management. METHODS: The 18F-PET/CT appearance of intrathyroid metastasis, including standardized uptake value (SUV), disease extent, and the effect on patient management following diagnosis were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria included 18F-PET/CT imaging and diagnosis of the intrathyroid metastasis matching the remote primary tumor. RESULTS: Intrathyroid metastasis were detected in 24 patients. The intrathyroid metastases presented on 18F-PET/CT as focal nodular uptake (n = 21), multiple nodular uptake (n = 2), or diffuse uptake/infiltration of the thyroid gland (n = 1). The SUV ranged between 3.9 and 42 (median 12.5 ± 7.5); in 2 patients, the FDG-avidity was minimal. On 18F-PET/CT, distant metastases were present outside the neck (n = 18), or limited to the neck (n = 6). In 2 of these 6 patients, the thyroid was the only site of metastatic disease. Due to the metastatic disease, the therapy was changed in 23 of 24 patients; 1 patient was lost to follow-up. CONCLUSION: In any patient with a previous or current history of an extrathyroid malignancy, an 18FDG-avid thyroid mass or diffuse infiltration of the thyroid on 18F-PET/CT should be considered a potential intrathyoid metastasis until proven otherwise. Knowledge of an intrathyroid metastasis may impact patient management, especially if the thyroid or neck are the only sites of metastatic disease.
Entities:
Keywords:
Metastasis; PET/CT; Standardized uptake value (SUV); Thyroid