| Literature DB >> 30405609 |
Franziska Voß1, Thomas P Kohler1, Tanja Meyer2, Mohammed R Abdullah1, Fred J van Opzeeland3, Malek Saleh1, Stephan Michalik2, Saskia van Selm3, Frank Schmidt2,4, Marien I de Jonge3, Sven Hammerschmidt1.
Abstract
Streptococcus pneumoniae is endowed with a variety of surface-exposed proteins representing putative vaccine candidates. Lipoproteins are covalently anchored to the cell membrane and highly conserved among pneumococcal serotypes. Here, we evaluated these lipoproteins for their immunogenicity and protective potential against pneumococcal colonisation. A multiplex-based immunoproteomics approach revealed the immunogenicity of selected lipoproteins. High antibody titres were measured in sera from mice immunised with the lipoproteins MetQ, PnrA, PsaA, and DacB. An analysis of convalescent patient sera confirmed the immunogenicity of these lipoproteins. Examining the surface localisation and accessibility of the lipoproteins using flow cytometry indicated that PnrA and DacB were highly abundant on the surface of the bacteria. Mice were immunised intranasally with PnrA, DacB, and MetQ using cholera toxin subunit B (CTB) as an adjuvant, followed by an intranasal challenge with S. pneumoniae D39. PnrA protected the mice from pneumococcal colonisation. For the immunisation with DacB and MetQ, a trend in reducing the bacterial load could be observed, although this effect was not statistically significant. The reduction in bacterial colonisation was correlated with the increased production of antigen-specific IL-17A in the nasal cavity. Immunisation induced high systemic IgG levels with a predominance for the IgG1 isotype, except for DacB, where IgG levels were substantially lower compared to MetQ and PnrA. Our results indicate that lipoproteins are interesting targets for future vaccine strategies as they are highly conserved, abundant, and immunogenic.Entities:
Keywords: Streptococcus pneumoniae; colonization; immunogenicity; lipoprotein; protection
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30405609 PMCID: PMC6202950 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02405
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Strain and plasmid list.
| SP257 (D39) | 2 | None | NCTC7466 |
| PN111 | D39Δ | Kmr | ( |
| PN282 | D39Δ | Kmr, Ermr | This work |
| PN279 | D39Δ | Kmr, Ermr | ( |
| PN253 | D39Δ | Kmr, Ermr | ( |
| PN281 | D39Δ | Kmr, Ermr | ( |
| PN238 | D39Δ | Kmr, Ermr | This work |
| PN732 | D39Δ | Kmr, Trmr | This work |
| PN280 | D39Δ | Kmr, Ermr | This work |
| PN301 | D39Δ | Kmr, Ermr | This work |
| PN733 | D39Δ | Kmr, Ermr | This work |
| PN241 | D39Δ | Kmr, Ermr | This work |
| PN312 | D39Δ | Kmr, Ermr | This work |
| PN735 | D39Δ | Kmr, Ermr | This work |
| PN278 | D39Δ | Ermr | This work |
| PN275 | D39Δ | Ermr | ( |
| PN246 | D39Δ | Ermr | ( |
| PN277 | D39Δ | Ermr | ( |
| PN311 | D39Δ | Ermr | This work |
| PN093 | D39Δ | Trmr | ( |
| PN276 | D39Δ | Ermr | This work |
| PN172 | D39Δ | Ermr | ( |
| PN095 | D39Δ | Ermr | ( |
| PN243 | D39Δ | Ermr | This work |
| PN251 | D39Δ | Ermr | This work |
| PN031 | D39Δ | Ermr | ( |
| DH5α | Δ | None | Bethesda Research Labs, Gaithersburg, U.S. |
| BL21(DE3) | None | Novagen, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany | |
| pGEM®-T easy | TA cloning vector for PCR products | Apr | Madison, U.S. |
| p89 | pCR2.1Topo with erythromycin ( | Apr, Kmr, Ermr | ( |
| p873 | pGXT with capsule locus replaced by | Apr, Kmr | ( |
| p572 | pGEM-T derivative with | Apr | This work |
| p598 | pGEM-T derivative with | Apr, Ermr | This work |
| p559 | pGEM-T derivative with | Apr | ( |
| p563 | pGEM-T derivative with | Apr, Ermr | ( |
| p576 | pGEM-T derivative with | Apr | This work |
| p646 | pGEM-T derivative with | Apr, Ermr | This work |
| p560 | pGEM-T derivative with | Apr | This work |
| p565 | pGEM-T derivative with | Apr, Ermr | This work |
| p573 | pGEM-T derivative with | Apr | This work |
| p577 | pGEM-T derivative with | Apr, Ermr | This work |
| pTP1 | pET28 expression vector, N-terminal His-tag, TEV protease cleavage site, induction by IPTG | Kmr, Ermr | ( |
| p648 | pTP1 with TIGR4 | Kmr | This work |
| p652 | pTP1 with TIGR4 | Kmr | ( |
| p629 | pTP1 with TIGR4 | Kmr | ( |
| p651 | pTP1 with TIGR4 | Kmr | ( |
| P732 | pTP1 with TIGR4 | Kmr | This work |
| p264 | pET11a with R6 | Kmr | ( |
| p649 | pTP1 with TIGR4 | Kmr | This work |
| p653 | pTP1 with TIGR4 | Kmr | This work |
| p263 | pET11a with R6 | Kmr | ( |
| p628 | pTP1 with TIGR4 | Kmr | This work |
| p631 | pTP1 with TIGR4 | Kmr | This work |
| p105 | pQE30 with PspA (aa 32-289) without choline-binding domain | Apr | ( |
Km.
Primer list.
| Amplification of | adcAII_427 adcAII_430 | 5′-CTACTA |
| Inverse PCR of | adcAII_429 adcAII_428 | 5′-CTCACTG |
| Amplification of | metQ_382 metQ_385 | 5′-CTACTACTA |
| Inverse PCR of | metQ_384 metQ_383 | 5′-ACTCACTCACTG |
| Amplification of | pnrA_415 pnrA_418 | 5′-CTACTA |
| Inverse PCR of | pnrA_417 pnrA_416 | 5′-CTCACTG |
| Amplification of | sp_0191_392 sp_0191_395 | 5′-CTACTACTA |
| Inverse PCR of | sp_0191_394 sp_0191_393 | 5′-ACTCACTCACTG |
| Amplification of | sp_0899_419 sp_0899_422 | 5′-CTACTA |
| Inverse PCR of | sp_0899_421 sp_0899_420 | 5′-CTCACTG |
| Erythromycin ( | ermB_105 | 5′-GATGATGATGATCCCG |
| ermB_106 | 5′-AGTGAGTGAGTCCCGGG | |
| sp_0899_463 sp_0899_464 | 5′-GCGC | |
| adcAII_451 adcAII_452 | 5′-GGGC | |
| metQ_410 metQ_391 | 5′-AAAG | |
| pnrA_449 pnrA_450 | 5′-AAGC | |
| psaA_488 psaA_489 | 5′-GCGC | |
| sp_0191_392 sp_0191_393 | 5′-TATTTTCAGGGC | |
Restriction sites used for cloning are underlined.
Figure 1Pneumococcal lipoproteins heterologously expressed in E. coli. A 1-μg aliquot of heterologously expressed pneumococcal lipoproteins was separated using SDS-PAGE and the proteins were detected using silver staining (A) or with immunoblotting using a monoclonal mouse anti-Penta-His6 antibody and alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (B).
Sequence homology of selected lipoproteins among different pneumococcal strains based on protein sequences from S. pneumoniae TIGR4.
| TIGR4 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| D39 | 100.00 | 99.16 | 99.47 | 98.92 | 99.30 | 98.29 | 99.68 | 99.68 | 99.25 | 98.94 | 99.31 |
| P1031 | 99.02 | 98.32 | 99.47 | 98.38 | 99.30 | 98.86 | 99.36 | 99.68 | 98.88 | 100.00 | 99.31 |
| G54 | 99.02 | 96.64 | 100.00 | 98.92 | 98.24 | 98.57 | 93.15 | 99.35 | 99.25 | 100.00 | 98.97 |
| Hungary19A | 99.67 | 89.92 | 100.00 | 98.92 | 99.30 | 98.86 | 99.68 | 99.35 | 98.88 | 98.41 | 98.62 |
| 70585 | 99.34 | 89.08 | 99.47 | 100.00 | 99.65 | 98.86 | 100.00 | 99.68 | 99.25 | 100.00 | 99.31 |
| JJA | 100.00 | 86.97 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 99.65 | 98.57 | 99.68 | 96.76 | 99.63 | 100.00 | 98.89 |
| Taiwan19F | 100.00 | 86.97 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 99.65 | 98.57 | 99.68 | 99.68 | 99.25 | 98.94 | 99.31 |
Figure 2Pneumococcal lipoproteins are highly abundant on the pneumococcal surface. (A) In immunoblots, the specificity of antisera derived from intraperitoneal immunisations of CD-1 mice (n = 6) with recombinant lipoproteins was assessed. Therefore, the wild-type strain S. pneumoniae D39Δcps and the corresponding isogenic lipoprotein deficient mutants (2 × 108 bacteria per lane) were used. Enolase was detected with a rabbit anti-enolase serum and served as a loading control. (B) IgG antibody titrations were performed by incubating equimolar amounts of recombinant proteins with serial dilutions of isolated polyclonal IgGs. Detection was carried out using a peroxidase-coupled goat anti-mouse IgG followed by incubation with OPD as a substrate and absorbance was measured at 492 nm. Titrations were performed at least three times and the error bars represent the SEM. (C,D) Using the equation for the hyperbolic regression curve (, Bmax, maximal binding; Kd, concentration for half maximal binding) an initial IgG concentration was calculated in the linear dynamic range. The polyclonal IgGs with equal contents of IgG specific for each lipoprotein were therefore applied to enable the comparison of their surface abundances. In a flow cytometric approach, D39Δcps (C) and D39 (D) were incubated with the appropriate calculated concentration of IgG and concentrations 5-, 10-, 20-, and 50-fold greater to analyse the surface abundance of the selected lipoproteins. Antibody binding was detected using a goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor® 488-coupled secondary antibody. The percentage of positive gated events is depicted in the graphs, thereby indicating the proportion of wild-type bacteria positive for the binding of the respective anti-lipoprotein IgGs. The mean values of at least three independent experiments are shown, with error bars corresponding to SEM.
Figure 3Analysis of convalescent patient sera and mouse sera derived from intraperitoneal immunisations indicate the high immunogenicity of PnrA, DacB, and MetQ. (A) A total of 22 antisera from convalescent patients who suffered from pneumococcal infections such as pneumonia (n = 6), meningitis (n = 7), sepsis (n = 4), and unknown clinical outcomes (n = 5) caused by different pneumococcal serotypes were analysed to compare their levels of anti-lipoprotein antibodies. Each symbol represents a single antiserum, while the different colours indicate the clinical outcome of every patient. (B) The immunogenicity of the lipoproteins was further demonstrated by analysing the antibody kinetics of intraperitoneally immunised CD-1 mice (n = 6). The mice received three vaccinations with 20 μg antigen and Alum as the adjuvant, with a 2-week interval between treatments. Before each treatment and 2 weeks after the final immunisation, antisera were collected to enable the determination of the antibody kinetics. Each individual mouse is depicted in the graphs. All serum samples were serially diluted and measured using the FLEXMAP 3D® system. Response values reflect the levels of antigen-specific IgG for the 11 tested lipoproteins and the positive control PspA.
Figure 4Intranasal vaccinations with the lipoproteins MetQ, DacB or PnrA reduce pneumococcal colonisation and increase local IL-17A levels. Bacterial recovery of S. pneumoniae D39 from nasal tissue (A) and nasopharyngeal IL-17A levels (B) 3 days after the intranasal challenge of C57BL/6 mice (n = 12) with 3.4 × 106 CFU. Each mouse received three intranasal immunisations with 5 μg of one of the four recombinant proteins, MetQ, DacB, PnrA, or PspA, in combination with 4 μg CTB in 2-week intervals. The data were statistically analysed using a Kruskal Wallis test accompanied by Dunn's multiple comparison post-test, with all conditions compared to control mice that received an intranasal treatment with PBS and CTB. Symbols indicate individual mice, bars represent the group median, and the dotted line indicates the lower limit of detection. **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
Figure 5Intranasal immunisation with lipoproteins induces lower local and systemic humoral immune responses. (A) Six C57BL/6 mice used for the in vivo colonisation model were randomly selected for the analysis of their antibody kinetics following an intranasal immunisation with the lipoproteins MetQ, DacB, and PnrA. The mice received three doses with 5 μg antigen and 4 μg CTB as the adjuvant in 2-week intervals. Before each treatment and 2 weeks after the third immunisation, antisera were collected to determine the antibody kinetics. The data from each individual mouse are depicted for every protein. Antisera were serially diluted and measured using the FLEXMAP 3D® system. The response values reflect the levels of antigen-specific IgG. (B,C) Three weeks after the final immunisation, the mice were challenged with S. pneumoniae D39 (3.4 × 106 CFU) and 3 days after infection their nasal tissues were harvested, homogenised and analysed for local antigen-specific IgG (B) and IgA (C) using ELISA. The IgG and IgA levels were determined using a 1:10 or 1:2 dilution of the nasal homogenate, respectively. The data were statistically analysed using a Mann-Whitney U-test. Symbols represent individual mice (n = 12) and the bars represent the group median. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
Figure 6Intraperitoneal and intranasal immunisations with DacB, MetQ, or PnrA predominantly induce IgG1 responses. Antigen-specific total IgG, IgG1, and IgG2 titres were monitored using an ELISA in either post-immune sera following an intraperitoneal immunisation with Alum as the adjuvant (A,B) or in post-challenge sera obtained after intranasal immunisation with CTB as the adjuvant followed by an intranasal challenge with S. pneumoniae D39 (C,D). Antibody titres of each serum specimen are denoted as the log10 of the reciprocal dilution of the serum giving twice the average absorbance of the sera derived from the PBS-treated group. The data were statistically analysed using a Mann-Whitney U-test. Symbols represent individual mice (n = 6 for Alum group, n = 12 for CTB group) and bars represent the group median. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.