| Literature DB >> 30405038 |
Bo Zhang1, Yuanyuan Tian2, Xiaoyan Jin3, Tommy Y Lo4, Hongzhi Cui5.
Abstract
Phase change material (PCM) is a kind of thermal energy storage material. Solid-liquid PCM composite materials must overcome the issues of material leakage and low thermal conductivity before they are suitable for widespread use in the fields of building and industry. In this study, porous expandedEntities:
Keywords: carbon fiber; expanded graphite; gypsum-based composite material; mechanical properties; phase change material; thermal energy storage; thermal performances
Year: 2018 PMID: 30405038 PMCID: PMC6267567 DOI: 10.3390/ma11112205
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1The morphology of the raw materials: (a) Paraffin; (b) EG (Expanded Graphite); (c) carbon fiber; (d) gypsum.
Figure 2The morphology of the prepared materials: (a) Appearance of the prepared EG/P; (b,c) prepared gypsum board.
The mix proportions of EGPG (expanded graphite/paraffin gypsum-based composite materials).
| No. | Gypsum (g) | Water (g) | EG/P (g) | CF (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GC | 3600 | 1300 | -- | -- |
| GC-10%EG/P | 3600 | 1300 | 360 | -- |
| GC-20%EG/P | 3600 | 1300 | 720 | -- |
| GC-10%EG/P-1%CF | 3600 | 1300 | 360 | 36 |
| GC-20%EG/P-1%CF | 3600 | 1300 | 720 | 36 |
Note: GC represents the gypsum control group; GC-10%EG/P represents gypsum mixed with 10%EG/P; GC-10%EG/P-1%CF represents gypsum mixed with 10%EG/P and 1%CF.
Figure 3Schematic diagrams of thermal performance testing: (a) Testing system; (b) section of the testing system; (c) small house model.
Figure 4SEM images of EG and EG/P: (a) 285× magnification of EG; (b) 1000× magnification of EG; (c) 5000× magnification of EG; (d) 280× magnification of EG/P; (e) 1000× magnification of EG/P; (f) 5000× magnification of EG/P.
Figure 5DSC (Differential Scanning Calorimeter) curves of paraffin and expanded graphite/paraffin.
Figure 6TGA (Thermal Analysis System) and DTG (Derivative Thermogravimetric Analysis) curves of (a) paraffin and (b) expanded graphite/paraffin.
Figure 7DSC curves of expanded graphite/paraffin under different thermal cycles.
The thermal properties of expanded graphite/paraffin under different thermal cycles.
| Cycles | Melting Temperature (°C) | Melting Enthalpy (J/g) | Freezing Temperature (°C) | Freezing Enthalpy (J/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 22.3 | 105.0 | 19.9 | 105.5 |
| 150 | 22.0 | 104.9 | 20.2 | 105.2 |
| 250 | 22.0 | 103.3 | 20.2 | 104.5 |
| 350 | 22.1 | 102.7 | 20.3 | 103.8 |
| 450 | 22.1 | 101.8 | 20.3 | 104.1 |
Figure 8FT-IR spectrum of paraffin, EG, and expanded graphite/paraffin.
The thermal conductivity of EGPG.
| No. | Thermal Conductivity (W/m·K) | Energy Storage Capacity (J/g) |
|---|---|---|
| GC | 0.742 | 0 |
| GC-10%EG/P | 0.992 | 7.25 |
| GC-20%EG/P | 1.137 | 13.65 |
| GC-10%EG/P-1%CF | 1.350 | 7.20 |
| GC-20%EG/P-1%CF | 1.462 | 13.57 |
Figure 9Temperature curves of center point of five small house models.
Figure 10The mechanical strength of EGPG after seven days curing time.
Figure 11The mechanical strength of EGPG after thermal cycling.
Figure 12The morphology of gypsum: (a) Before thermal cycling; (b) after thermal cycling.
Figure 13The microstructure of EGPG with CF (Carbon Fiber): (a) CF in the cracks of EGPG; (b) the surface of EGPG with CF after fracture.
Figure 14The XRD pattern of gypsum: (a) Before thermal cycling; (b) after thermal cycling.