| Literature DB >> 30405032 |
Pavel Kutukov1, Marina Rumyantseva2, Valeriy Krivetskiy3, Darya Filatova4, Maria Batuk5, Joke Hadermann6, Nikolay Khmelevsky7, Anatoly Aksenenko8, Alexander Gaskov9.
Abstract
To obtain a nanocrystalline SnO₂ matrix and mono- and bimetallic nanocomposites SnO₂/Pd, SnO₂/Pt, and SnO₂/PtPd, a flame spray pyrolysis with subsequent impregnation was used. The materials were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD), a single-point BET method, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and high angle annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) with energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) mapping. The electronic state of the metals in mono- and bimetallic clusters was determined using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The active surface sites were investigated using the Fourier Transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and thermo-programmed reduction with hydrogen (TPR-H₂) methods. The sensor response of blank SnO₂ and nanocomposites had a carbon monoxide (CO) level of 6.7 ppm and was determined in the temperature range 60⁻300 °C in dry (Relative Humidity (RH) = 0%) and humid (RH = 20%) air. The sensor properties of the mono- and bimetallic nanocomposites were analyzed on the basis of information on the electronic state, the distribution of modifiers in SnO₂ matrix, and active surface centers. For SnO₂/PtPd, the combined effect of the modifiers on the electrophysical properties of SnO₂ explained the inversion of sensor response from n- to p-types observed in dry conditions.Entities:
Keywords: bimetallic particles; carbon monoxide; gas sensor; nanocomposites; nanocrystalline semiconductor oxides; palladium; platinum; response inversion; tin oxide
Year: 2018 PMID: 30405032 PMCID: PMC6266303 DOI: 10.3390/nano8110917
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Microstructure characteristics and composition of investigated samples.
| Sample | Ssurf, m2/g | [M], wt.% ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SnO2 | Pd | Pt | ||||
| SnO2 | 22 ± 5 | 10 ± 1 | 10.7 ± 4.9 | - | - | - |
| SnO2/Pd | <2; 8–20 | - | 1.5 ± 0.2 ( | |||
| SnO2/Pt | - | 25–100 | 1.0 ± 0.2 ( | |||
| SnO2/PtPd | <2 | 17–64 | 1.3 ± 0.2 (Pd) 0.3 ± 0.1 (Pt) | |||
( crystallite size (X-ray diffraction, XRD); ( particle size (transmission electron microscopy, TEM); ( obtained using X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis.
Figure 1Resistance of the samples in the temperature range 60–300 °C under the periodic change of the gas phase composition at relative humidity (a) Relative Humidity (RH) = 0% and (b) RH = 20%. (c) An enlarged image of the resistance variation of the samples when measured in dry air (RH = 0%). (1) SnO2, (2) SnO2/Pd, (3) SnO2/Pt, (4) SnO2/PtPd. Pale blue areas correspond to exposure in CO.
Figure 2Sensor signal to 6.7 ppm CO of blank SnO2 and mono- and bimetallic nanocomposites in the temperature range 60–300 °C at relative humidity RH = 0% (a) and RH = 20% (b).
Figure 3X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of SnO2 powder obtained using the flame spray pyrolysis (FSP) method. Vertical lines correspond to the ICDD 41-1445 reference (SnO2 cassiterite).
Figure 4High angle annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) image: (a) and particle size distribution (b) of the SnO2 matrix.
Figure 5HAADF-STEM image: (a) energy dispersive X-ray scanning transmission electron microscopy (EDX-STEM) map (b) of the SnO2/Pd nanocomposite.
Figure 6HAADF-STEM image: (a) EDX-STEM map (b) and Pt particles size distribution (c) of the SnO2/Pt nanocomposite.
Figure 7HAADF-STEM image: (a) EDX-STEM map (b) of the SnO2/PtPd nanocomposite. (c) Pt content in PtPd nanoparticles of different size.
Figure 8XP spectra Pd3d, (a) Pt4f, (b) O1s (c) of the samples.
Pd 3d5/2 and Pt 4f7/2 XP spectral assignments.
| Spectral Assignment | Binding Energy, eV | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ref. [ | Ref. [ | SnO2/Pd | SnO2/Pt | SnO2/PtPd | |
| Pd 3d5/2 | Pd (0) 335.4 | 336.9 | - | 336.0 | |
| PdO 336.4 | |||||
| Pt 4f7/2 | Pt (0) 71.0 | - | 72.0 | 72.2 | |
| Pt (II) 72.4 | |||||
| Pt (IV) 74.9 | |||||
Figure 9(a) IR spectra of blank SnO2 and nanocomposites normalized to the intensity Sn-O oscillations. Inset: enlarged spectra in 3100–3800 cm−1 region. (b) TPR-H2 profiles of blank SnO2 and nanocomposites.
Results of the TPR-H2 experiments.
| Sample | Hydrogen Consumption, Mol H2 per 1 Mol SnO2 | Tmax, °C |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 100–300 °C | 370–850 °C | |||
| SnO2 | 2.9 ± 0.3 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 2.2 ± 0.5 | 630 | 1.0×10−4 |
| SnO2/Pd | 2.5 ± 0.3 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 2.3 ± 0.5 | 580 | 3.0×10−5 |
| SnO2/Pt | 2.3 ± 0.3 | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 1.9 ± 0.5 | 565 | 6.0×10−5 |
| SnO2/PtPd | 2.1 ± 0.3 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 1.9 ± 0.5 | 565 | 3.0×10−5 |