Literature DB >> 30403781

The cost of providing and scaling up surgery: a comparison of a district hospital and a referral hospital in Zambia.

Leon Bijlmakers1, Dennis Cornelissen2, Mweene Cheelo3, Mzaza Nthele4, John Kachimba4, Henk Broekhuizen1, Jakub Gajewski5, Ruairí Brugha5.   

Abstract

The lack of access to quality-assured surgery in rural parts of sub-Saharan Africa, where the numbers of trained health workers are often insufficient, presents challenges for national governments. The case for investing in scaling up surgical systems in low-resource settings is 3-fold: the potential beneficial impact on a large proportion of the global burden of disease; better access for rural populations who have the greatest unmet need; and the economic case. The economic losses from untreated surgical conditions far exceed any expenditure that would be required to scale up surgical care. We identified the resources used in delivering surgery at a rural district-level hospital and an urban based referral hospital in Zambia and calculated their cost through a combination of bottom-up costing and step-down accounting. Surgery performed at the referral hospital is ∼50% more expensive compared with the district hospital, mostly because of the higher cost of hospital stay. The low bed occupancy rates at the two hospitals suggest underutilization of the capacity, and/or missing elements of needed capacity, to conduct surgery. Nevertheless, our study confirms that scaling up district-level surgery makes sense, through bringing economies of scale, while acknowledging the need for more comprehensive assessments and costing of capacity constraints. We quantified the economies of scale under different scaling scenarios. If surgery at the district hospital was scaled up by 10, 20 or 50%, the total cost of surgery would increase proportionately less than that, i.e. by 6, 12 and 30%, respectively. If this were to lead to less demand for surgery at the referral hospital, say 10% less surgery, it would result in a reduction of 2.7% in the total cost. Although the health system as a whole would benefit, the referring hospitals would not derive the full economic benefit, unless Government increased resources for district-level surgery.
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords:  Global surgery; cost; district hospital; rural; scaling up

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30403781     DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czy086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy Plan        ISSN: 0268-1080            Impact factor:   3.344


  4 in total

Review 1.  Safe Healthcare Facilities: A Systematic Review on the Costs of Establishing and Maintaining Environmental Health in Facilities in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Authors:  Darcy M Anderson; Ryan Cronk; Donald Fejfar; Emily Pak; Michelle Cawley; Jamie Bartram
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Economies of scale of large-scale international development interventions: Evidence from self-help groups in India.

Authors:  Garima Siwach; Sohini Paul; Thomas de Hoop
Journal:  World Dev       Date:  2022-05

3.  Surgical ambulance referrals in sub-Saharan Africa - financial costs and coping strategies at district hospitals in Tanzania, Malawi and Zambia.

Authors:  Martilord Ifeanyichi; Henk Broekhuizen; Mweene Cheelo; Adinan Juma; Gerald Mwapasa; Eric Borgstein; John Kachimba; Jakub Gajewski; Ruairi Brugha; Chiara Pittalis; Leon Bijlmakers
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Doctor Retention in a COVID-World: An Opportunity to Reconfigure the Health Workforce, or "Plus ça change plus c'est la meme chose"? A Response to the Recent Commentaries.

Authors:  Ruairí Brugha
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2022-06-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.