Literature DB >> 30403415

Psychosocial characteristics of blood donors influence their voluntary nonmedical lapse.

Eva-Maria Merz1,2, Eamonn Ferguson3, Anne van Dongen4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Approximately 10% of Dutch donors lapse yearly. Common reasons are nonvoluntary medical issues (e.g., low hemoglobin), reaching the upper age limit, and voluntary (e.g., own request, nonresponse). Little is known about predictors of voluntary noncompliance (lapses). Psychosocial characteristics have been linked to various health behaviors, including voluntary noncompliance. Hence, we investigated whether psychosocial characteristics, measured before the first donation, similarly predict subsequent voluntary nonmedical lapse. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: New donors (n = 4861) randomly received a blood donation survey between July 2008 and March 2009, before their first appointment at the blood bank. Voluntary lapses included personal reasons, nonresponse to invitations, donor who could not be reached, and no show. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models of lapse on psychosocial characteristics and confounders (e.g., demographics) were estimated.
RESULTS: Of 2964 donors who took the questionnaire, more than one-third (36.5%) had voluntarily lapsed due to nonmedical reasons by 2016. Univariate regression showed that lapse negatively associated with norms, attitudes, and intentions toward blood donation; self-efficacy; and more donation experience. Lapse positively associated with anxiety. Multivariate Cox models showed that lapse was primarily driven by anxiety and need for information.
CONCLUSION: Certain psychosocial characteristics increase risks of voluntary lapse. Especially donors with higher donation anxiety had increased lapsing risks. They might benefit from extra attention during donation. Donors with more information need or wish about procedure and patients were less likely to lapse, indicating that binding with the blood bank might prevent lapse. Generally, this study showed that donor lapse and donor return are determined by different psychosocial factors not just the reverse of each other.
© The Authors. Transfusion published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of AABB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30403415     DOI: 10.1111/trf.14891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  3 in total

Review 1.  Beyond Description: The Predictive Role of Affect, Memory, and Context in the Decision to Donate or Not Donate Blood.

Authors:  Barbara Masser; Eamonn Ferguson; Eva-Maria Merz; Lisa Williams
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.747

2.  Determinants of blood donation willingness in the European Union: a cross-country perspective on perceived transfusion safety, concerns, and incentives.

Authors:  Elisabeth M J Huis In 't Veld; Wim L A M de Kort; Eva-Maria Merz
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 3.157

3.  A Markov jump process approach to modeling blood donor status: Donor retention and attrition rates at a blood service center in Zimbabwe.

Authors:  Delson Chikobvu; Coster Chideme
Journal:  Health Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.