Literature DB >> 30402887

VA-ECMO Support in Nonsurgical Patients With Refractory Cardiogenic Shock: Pre-Implant Outcome Predictors.

Thomas Fux1,2, Manne Holm1, Matthias Corbascio1,3, Lars H Lund4,3, Jan van der Linden1,2.   

Abstract

Refractory cardiogenic shock (RCS) is associated with a high mortality. Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is increasingly used as acute cardiopulmonary support but selection of VA-ECMO candidates remains challenging. There are limited data on which pre-VA-ECMO variables that predict outcome. The aim of this study was to identify pre-VA-ECMO predictors of 90-day mortality. We retrospectively analyzed 76 consecutive patients (median age 52; interquartile range [IQR]: 37-60) supported with VA-ECMO due to RCS. The association between pre-implant variables and all-cause mortality at 90 days was analyzed with multivariable logistic regression. Main etiologies of RCS were acute myocardial infarction 51% and other AHF etiologies 49%. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was performed in 54% of patients before initiation of VA-ECMO. Median duration of VA-ECMO was 5 days (IQR: 2-11). The 90-day overall mortality was 49% and in-hospital mortality was 50%; 46% died on VA-ECMO, 37% were successfully weaned, 13% were bridged to heart transplantation, and 4% to left ventricular assist device. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified arterial lactate (odds ratio [OR] per mmol/L: 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-1.24; P = 0.001) and number of inotropes and vasopressors (OR per agent: 2.14; 95% CI: 1.26-3.63; P = 0.005) as independent predictors of 90-day mortality. In RCS patients arterial lactate level and number of inotropes and vasopressors were identified as independent pre-VA-ECMO predictors of 90-day mortality. Thus, the severity of cardiogenic shock expressed as levels of lactate and vasoactive agents just before start of VA-ECMO may be more predictive of outcome than the specific etiology of cardiogenic shock.
© 2018 International Center for Artificial Organs and Transplantation and Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiogenic shock; Heart failure; Mechanical circulatory support; Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30402887     DOI: 10.1111/aor.13331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Organs        ISSN: 0160-564X            Impact factor:   3.094


  4 in total

1.  Early Blood Pressure Variables Associated With Improved Outcomes in VA-ECLS: The ELSO Registry Analysis.

Authors:  Aniket S Rali; Sagar Ranka; Amy Butcher; Zubair Shah; Joseph E Tonna; Marc M Anders; Marshal D Brinkley; Hasan Siddiqi; Lynn Punnoose; Mark Wigger; Suzanne B Sacks; Dawn Pedrotty; Henry Ooi; Matthew D Bacchetta; Jordan Hoffman; William McMaster; Keki Balsara; Ashish S Shah; Jonathan N Menachem; Kelly H Schlendorf; JoAnn Lindenfeld; Sandip K Zalawadiya
Journal:  JACC Heart Fail       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 12.544

2.  The removal of floating right heart thrombi and pulmonary embolus using AngioJet device and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a case report.

Authors:  Guang Chen; Xiaolong Zhang; Qin Wang; Jie Qin; You-Zu Xu; Xiang Li; Fei Li; Xiang Wang; Bin Hu; Haiwei Chu; Dexing Zheng; Jiecheng Zhang; Wenjun Zhao; Lingping Ma
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-05

3.  Predictors of mortality following extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in an unselected, critically ill patient population.

Authors:  István Ferenc Édes; Balázs Tamás Németh; István Hartyánszky; Bálint Szilveszter; Péter Kulyassa; Levente Fazekas; Miklós Pólos; Endre Németh; Dávid Becker; Béla Merkely
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 1.426

4.  Long-Term Follow-Up of Survivors of Extracorporeal Life Support Therapy for Cardiogenic Shock: Are They Really Survivors?

Authors:  Rafal Berger; Attila Nemeth; Rodrigo Sandoval Boburg; Louise Vöhringer; Henning Florian Lausberg; Metesh Acharya; Christian Schlensak; Aron-Frederik Popov
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 2.430

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.