Literature DB >> 30402681

Bowel management program in patients with spina bifida.

Julie Schletker1, Tiffany Edmonds2, Rebecca Jacobson2, Jill Ketzer2, Jennifer Hall2, Andrew Trecartin2, Alberto Peña2, Andrea Bischoff2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Our center has been successfully implementing a bowel management program (BMP) for fecal incontinence consecutive to anorectal malformation and Hirschsprung disease. Recently, the number of patients with spina bifida requiring management for fecal incontinence has increased. The purpose of this study was to review the results of bowel management in patients with spina bifida and the challenges unique to this population.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed including all patients with spina bifida who attended our BMP from February 2016 until April 2018. Data collection included: prenatal intervention, gender, age, characteristics of contrast enema, success rateand challenges faced.
RESULTS: Twenty-two patients met inclusion criteria 13 of which were females. Three patients had their myelomeningocele repaired prenatally, the remaining were repaired postnatally. Patient ages ranged from 2 to 24 years. Only nine patients were referred to BMP at proper toilet training age. Three patients came to BMP status post an antegrade enema procedure with reported "accidents" on their current regimen. The colon in the contrast enema was non-dilated in all patients and two behaved as hypermotile requiring loperamide. Seventeen patients (77%) were clean of stool and considered successful. Solution leakage during enema administration was the most common challenge and was corrected by increasing the Foley balloon fill volume.
CONCLUSIONS: Our bowel management program with enemas is effective for patients with a history of spina bifida. The data support specific considerations for this population including frequent adjustments, close follow-up and specific administration techniques.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bowel management; Constipation; Enema; Fecal incontinence; Myelomeningocele; Neurogenic bowel; Spina bifida

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30402681     DOI: 10.1007/s00383-018-4403-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


  3 in total

Review 1.  Malone Antegrade Continence Enemas vs. Cecostomy vs. Transanal Irrigation-What Is New and How Do We Counsel Our Patients?

Authors:  Maryellen S Kelly
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Analysis of patients' and caregivers' psychosocial functioning in colorectal conditions: comparison of diagnosis, gender, and developmental functioning.

Authors:  Laura Judd-Glossy; Merlin Ariefdjohan; Jill Ketzer; Stefanie Curry; Julie Schletker; Tiffany Edmonds; Amy Krause; Hope Simmons; Alberto Pena; Luis De La Torre; Andrea Bischoff
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  Considering the value of online support groups for colorectal conditions: perspectives from caregivers and adult patients.

Authors:  Laura Judd-Glossy; Merlin Ariefdjohan; Jill Ketzer; Kristina Matkins; Julie Schletker; Amy Krause; Hope Simmons; Alberto Pena; Luis De La Torre; Andrea Bischoff
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2021-09-25       Impact factor: 2.003

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.