Literature DB >> 30402513

Exclusive versus Inclusive Trauma System Model in High Volume Trauma Regions.

Shahram Paydar1, Zahra Ghahramani1, Shahram Bolandparvaz1, Hossein Abdolrahimzadeh1, Abdolkhalegh Keshavarzi2, Mohammad Javad Moradian1, Hamid Reza Abbasi1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Exclusive; Inclusive; Trauma Region; Trauma System Model

Year:  2018        PMID: 30402513      PMCID: PMC6215069          DOI: 10.29252/beat-060401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Emerg Trauma        ISSN: 2322-2522


× No keyword cloud information.
Trauma is the leading cause of death before age 45 years in developing countries. It has been shown that a sophisticated trauma system will reduce the mortality (up to 15%) and morbidity of the injured people [1-5]. Trauma system consists of an interconnected chain of care from prehospital and hospital management of injured individuals to proper rehabilitation and follow-up cares. Goals of implementing a trauma system are: increasing the likelihood of survival of the injured, reduce the probability of disability and, at the same time, reduce costs. To achieve these, all stakeholders in the chain should play their role, along with implementing regulation and comprehensive legislation by legal authorities [6]. The network of care in a trauma system can be an “Inclusive” or “Exclusive” system. The exclusive system is more relying on tertiary hospital and consider the “trauma” strictly as a surgical disease. So the main goal is to transfer the injured to full equipped trauma center by provision of specialized and exclusive services. At this center only trauma victims are treated. On the other hand, inclusive model tries to manage the injured trauma patients by organizing the existing facilities in the region. In fact, trauma centers are installed within the existing hospitals in two forms. This trauma center may be a section in a separate part in a hospital or it may be a distinguished process and protocols in the existing diagnostic medical services that has more emphasis on the priority and the urgency of the conditions of the trauma victims at time of arrival. Cole et al., [7] showed that implementation of an interconnected regional trauma system will improve the overall quality of care for patients. Other studies also state that although exclusive models can improve trauma diagnosis and treatment indices, but they are costly and not a good model for developing countries [4, 8-10]. Even in developed countries with a high Acute Care Surgery service, they are switching to integrating trauma centers with other medical facilities to reduce costs. Besides, in some cases, for example, in Scandinavian countries, the incidence of trauma declined tremendously and trauma centers are switching to other medical specialties.  So it seems that implementing inclusive traumatic systems in developing countries, like Iran, is more logical. In this regard, the following steps are recommended to achieve this goal: Identification and leveling the existing medical facilities at each region Specify the level of services provided in each center Develop a trauma specific triage model and referral system according to the leveling and capacities of the centers in each region Creating a regional guideline for nursing care and also treatment protocol according to different types of injury in different level of trauma system

Conflict of Interest:

None declared.
  9 in total

1.  Relationship between trauma center volume and outcomes.

Authors:  A B Nathens; G J Jurkovich; R V Maier; D C Grossman; E J MacKenzie; M Moore; F P Rivara
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-03-07       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  The Impact of a Pan-regional Inclusive Trauma System on Quality of Care.

Authors:  Elaine Cole; Fiona Lecky; Anita West; Neil Smith; Karim Brohi; Ross Davenport
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Impact of interhospital transfer on outcomes for trauma patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Andrea D Hill; Robert A Fowler; Avery B Nathens
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2011-12

Review 4.  A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcome of severely injured patients treated in trauma centers following the establishment of trauma systems.

Authors:  Brian Celso; Joseph Tepas; Barbara Langland-Orban; Etienne Pracht; Linda Papa; Lawrence Lottenberg; Lewis Flint
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2006-02

5.  The effect of trauma center designation and trauma volume on outcome in specific severe injuries.

Authors:  Demetrios Demetriades; Mathew Martin; Ali Salim; Peter Rhee; Carlos Brown; Linda Chan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Inclusive trauma systems: do they improve triage or outcomes of the severely injured?

Authors:  Garth H Utter; Ronald V Maier; Frederick P Rivara; Charles N Mock; Gregory J Jurkovich; Avery B Nathens
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2006-03

Review 7.  Do designated trauma systems improve outcome?

Authors:  Koen W W Lansink; Luke P H Leenen
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.687

8.  Outcomes of trauma patients after transfer to a level I trauma center.

Authors:  Frederick P Rivara; Thomas D Koepsell; Jin Wang; Avery Nathens; Gregory A Jurkovich; Ellen J Mackenzie
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2008-06

9.  Level I versus Level II trauma centers: an outcomes-based assessment.

Authors:  Michael T Cudnik; Craig D Newgard; Michael R Sayre; Steven M Steinberg
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2009-05
  9 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Trauma Care in Nigeria: Time for an Integrated Trauma System.

Authors:  Isaac C Okereke; Ubaid Zahoor; Omar Ramadan
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-01-02

2.  Development of the Saudi Arabian trauma system.

Authors:  Sharfuddin Chowdhury; Dennis Mok; Luke Leenen
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2022-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.