| Literature DB >> 30402460 |
Mara A Correa1, Andrea Borrego1, José R Jensen1, Wafa H K Cabrera1, Michele Barros2, Iana S S Katz3, Tatiane Canhamero1, Monica Spadafora-Ferreira1, Jussara G Fernandes1, Nancy Starobinas1, Orlando G Ribeiro1, Olga M Ibañez1, Marcelo De Franco1,3.
Abstract
Mouse lines selected for maximal (AIRmax) or minimal acute inflammatory reaction (AIRmin) were used to characterize the immune response and the influence of genetic background during pristane-induced arthritis (PIA). Susceptible AIRmax mice demonstrated exacerbated cellular profiles during PIA, with intense infiltration of lymphocytes, as well as monocytes/macrophages and neutrophils, producing higher levels of IL-1β, IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-10, total IgG3, and chemokines. Resistant AIRmin mice controlled cell activation more efficiently than the AIRmax during arthritis progression. The weight alterations of the spleen and thymus in the course of PIA were observed. Our data suggest that selected AIRmax cellular and genetic immune mechanisms contribute to cartilage damage and arthritis severity, evidencing many targets for therapeutic actions.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30402460 PMCID: PMC6197000 DOI: 10.1155/2018/1267038
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Flow cytometry gating strategy for lymphoid cells analysis. Live cells were gated on total cells plot identified by forward scatter (FSC) and side scatter (SSC) properties (a). Cell doublets were excluded by the analysis of the FSC height values over the FSC area values (b). Negative cells to F4-80 and Gr1 markers were selected (c) and then T and B lymphocytes (CD3 and CD19 positive cells, respectively) were analysed (d). In the next step, CD4 and CD8 expression was evaluated inside CD3 positive T cells gate (e).
Figure 2Survival curves (a) and arthritis incidence in AIRmax and AIRmin mice (b). AIRmax and AIRmin mice were injected two i.p 0.5 mL pristane injections and were observed for 180 days. Survival curves: AIRmax (N= 21) and AIRmin (N= 20). The data are presented as mean ± SD. Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) Test (∗p < 0.05), in comparison to AIRmin group. Arthritis incidence: AIRmax (N= 33) and AIRmin (N= 32). The data are presented as mean ± SEM and three different experiments (∗) p < 0.05; (∗∗) p < 0.01; (∗∗∗) p < 0.001.
Figure 3((a)–(d)) Evolution of body and specific organs weight during pristane-induced arthritis. Changes in weight mass of AIRmax and AIRmin mice were examined at 180 days after pristane injection. The data are presented as mean ± SEM and three different experiments. AIRmax (N= 33) and AIRmin (N= 32). (∗) p < 0.05 AIRmin PIA between 0 d vs. 120 d and 180 d; (#) p < 0.05 AIRmax control between 0 d vs. 120 d and 150 d.
Figure 4Time course of changes in cytokine concentrations in pristane-treated mice. Serum cytokines levels were assessed during arthritis development (0 and 180 days). Reactions were carried out in six biological replicates and the results are expressed as the mean ± SEM. AIRmax (N= 6) and AIRmin (N= 6). (∗) p < 0.05; (∗∗) p < 0.01.
Figure 5Time course of changes in immunoglobulin concentrations in pristane-treated mice. Immunoglobulin levels in serum were assessed during arthritis development (0-180 days). Reactions were carried out in six biological replicates and the results are expressed as the mean ± SEM. AIRmax (N= 6) and AIRmin (N= 6). (∗) p < 0.05; (∗∗) p < 0.01; (∗∗∗) p<0.001.
Figure 6Flow cytometry analysis of peritoneum cavity of AIRmax and AIRmin during PIA. Analysis of peritoneum cells from a representative arthritis and control mice at 180 days after pristane injection is shown. The results are expressed as the mean ± SEM. AIRmax (N= 27) and AIRmin (N= 20). (∗) p < 0.05; (∗∗) p < 0.01; (∗∗∗) p < 0.001.
Figure 7Flow cytometry gating strategy for myeloid cells analysis. Live cells were gated on total cells plot identified by forward scatter (FSC) and side scatter (SSC) properties (a). Cell doublets were excluded by the analysis of the FSC height values over the FSC area values (b). Positive cells to CD11b marker were selected (c) and then macrophages and neutrophils (F4-80 and Gr1 positive cells, respectively) were gated on CD11b positive selection (d).