Corrigendum to "Associations between Social and Physical Environments, and Physical Activity in Adults from Urban and Rural Regions"[Osong Public Health Res Perspect 2018;9(1):16-24].

[This corrects the article on p. 16 in vol. 9, PMID: 29503801.].

The authors regret to report that in the original paper [1], the OR and 95% CI values of the individual level variables in Table 4 are missing. Furthermore, the OR values and 95% CI values of individual and community level variables are missing or incorrectly presented in Table 5.

Table 4

Effects of individual and community level factors upon moderate or vigorous physical activity: a multilevel analysis; urban.

		Model 1		Model 2		Model 3
		OR	95%CI	OR	95%CI	OR	95%CI
Fixed effect
Individual level
Gender	Male (ref)
	Female			0.675	0.653–0.696	0.675	0.653–0.697
Age (y)	19–34 (ref)
	35–49			1.033	0.988–1.081	1.033	0.988–1.080
	50–64			1.295	1.299–1.364	1.295	1.229–1.364
Marital status	Living with spouse (ref)
	Divorced, and bereaved			1.086	1.028–1.147	1.086	1.028–1.363
	Single			1.377	1.314–1.443	1.376	1.313–1.442
Education	Uneducated (ref)
	Elementary school			1.019	0.861–1.205	1.019	0.861–1.206
	Middle school			1.004	0.846–1.190	1.004	0.847–1.191
	High school			0.963	0.813–1.142	0.965	0.814–1.144
	≥College/University			1.042	0.874–1.242	1.044	0.876–1.244
Job	Non-manual (ref)
	Manual			1.077	1.034–1.121	1.078	1.035–1.122
	Housewife, unemployed			1.022	0.985–1.059	1.022	0.985–1.059
Household income / monthly	<100			1.129	1.041–1.224	1.129	1.040–1.224
	100–200			1.075	0.993–1.164	1.075	0.993–1.164
	201–300			1.171	1.081–1.268	1.170	1.080–1.267
	301–400			1.176	1.088–1.269	1.175	1.088–1.268
	≥401(ref)
Self-rated health	Poor (ref)
	Neither good nor			1.098	1.059–1.138	1.097	1.059–1.138
	Very good			1.217	1.169–1.267	1.217	1.169–1.266
No. of Chronic diseases	0 (ref)
	1			1.040	0.995–1.086	1.040	0.995–1.086
	≥2			0.916	0.865–0.969	0.916	0.865–0.969
BMI	Obesity			0.974	0.939–1.009	0.974	0.939–1.009
Community level
Satisfaction with safety						1.362	0.256–5.941
Satisfaction with natural environment						0.446	0.159–1.378
Satisfaction with living environment						2.596	0.382–17.314
Satisfaction with public transportation						2.829	1.001–7.223
Satisfaction with health service						0.927	0.357–2.288
Social cohesion						0.660	0.308–1.477
Social networks						0.969	0.876–1.072
Social activity participation						2.534	0.768–14.318
Presence of cycle paths (ref=no)						0.993	0.815–1.148
Number of exercise facilities						1.001	0.996–1.001
Number of sports park						0.978	0.960–0.995
Number of hiking trails						0.994	0.989–0.999
Community level random effect
Between community variance (SE)		0.1389(0.026)		0.1406(0.027)		0.0938(0.022)
ICC		0.040		0.040		0.028
Statistics for the model fit
Log likelihood		−53990.092		−50962.909		−50943.399
Likelihood-ratio test
χ2 (p)		2198.89(<.001)		2074.46 (<.001)		1339.29(<.001)

BMI = body mass index, CI = confidence interval, ICC = intra-class correlation.

Table 5

Effects of individual and community level factors upon moderate or vigorous physical activity: a multilevel analysis; rural.

		Model 1		Model 2		Model 3
		OR	95%CI	OR	95%CI	OR	95%CI
Fixed effect
Individual level
Gender	Male (ref)
	Female			0.728	0.696–0.760	0.728	0.696–0.760
Age (y)	19–34 (ref)
	35–49			1.102	1.026–1.184	1.102	1.025–1.183
	50–64			1.310	1.207–1.422	1.309	1.206–1.420
Marital status	Living with spouse (ref)
	Divorced, and bereaved			1.030	0.962–1.104	1.031	0.963–1.104
	Single			1.162	1.080–1.251	1.161	1.079–1.250
Education	Uneducated (ref)
	Elementary school			1.019	0.861–1.205	1.019	0.861–1.206
	Middle school			1.004	0.846–1.190	1.004	0.847–1.191
	High school			0.963	0.813–1.142	0.965	0.814–1.144
	≥College/University			1.042	0.874–1.242	1.044	0.876–1.244
Job	Non-manual (ref)
	Manual			1.379	1.310–1.452	1.377	1.307–1.450
	Housewife, unemployed			0.854	0.806–0.905	0.855	0.807–0.905
Household income / monthly	<100			1.070	1.001–1.163	1.079	1.001–1.164
	100–200			1.155	1.069–1.247	1.156	1.070–1.249
	201–300			1.147	1.057–1.245	1.149	1.059–1.248
	301–400			1.178	1.090–1.273	1.091	1.101–1.274
	≥401(ref)
Self-rated health	Poor (ref)
	Neither good nor			1.058	1.007–1.111	1.058	1.007–1.111
	Very good			1.175	1.115–1.237	1.174	1.114–1.236
No. of Chronic diseases	0 (ref)
	1			1.091	1.033–1.152	1.091	1.033–1.152
	≥2			1.012	0.947–1.082	1.012	0.947–1.082
BMI	Obesity			0.985	0.941–1.031	0.985	0.941–1.031
Community level
Satisfaction with safety						0.047	0.003–0.867
Satisfaction with natural environment						4.404	0.741–26.156
Satisfaction with living environment						0.277	0.061–1.253
Satisfaction with public transportation						2.604	0.781–8.680
Satisfaction with health service						1.728	0.592–5.039
Social cohesion						4.693	1.216–18.114
Social networks						1.023	0.913–1.158
Social activity participation						0.515	0.203–1.303
Presence of cycle paths (ref=no)						1.328	1.007–1.751
Number of exercise facilities						0.997	0.994–1.001
Number of sports park						1.026	1.001–1.058
Number of hiking trails						1.025	1.006–1.044
Community level random effect
Between community variance (SE)		0.1695(0.033)		0.1627(0.032)		0.1123(0.027)
ICC		0.049		0.047		0.033
Statistics for the model fit
Log likelihood		−30539.61		−27952.831		−27937.739
Likelihood-ratio test
χ2 (p)		1472.76(<.001)		1261.70(<.001)		882.40(<.001)

BMI = body mass index, CI = confidence interval, ICC = intra-class correlation.

The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused.