Literature DB >> 30402053

Corrigendum: Phytoplasmas-The "Crouching Tiger" Threat of Australian Plant Pathology.

Jian Liu1,2,3, David Gopurenko3,4, Murray J Fletcher3, Anne C Johnson3, Geoff M Gurr1,2,3.   

Abstract

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00599.].

Entities:  

Keywords:  16S rRNA; biodiversity; biosecurity; host range; seed transmission; taxonomy; vector; “Candidatus Phytoplasma”

Year:  2018        PMID: 30402053      PMCID: PMC6214406          DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Plant Sci        ISSN: 1664-462X            Impact factor:   5.753


In the original article, information for phytoplasmas in Table 1 did not fully reflect recent changes in taxonomy, or showed changes only as footnotes. Corrections have been made in the sections below and in Table 1.
Table 1

Taxonomic and biological information on phytoplasmas in Australia (empty cells denote the absence of available information).

16Sr group“Candidatus Phytoplasma” namePhytoplasma trivial nameHost plant speciesPotential vectorsLocation+References*
IIaustralasiaeaAustralian lucerne yellowsMedicago sativa, Carica papayaOrosius argentatus, Austroagallia torrida, Orosius spp., Batracomorphus sp.South Australia, New South Wales, Northern TerritoryPadovan and Gibb, 2001*; Pilkington et al., 2003*; Yang et al., 2013
IIBonamia pannosa little leafBonamia pannosaNorthern TerritorySchneider et al., 1999; Padovan and Gibb, 2001
IICactus witches' broomCarica papayaNorthern TerritoryPadovan and Gibb, 2001
IICocky apple witches' broomPlanchonia careyaQueenslandDavis et al., 2001
IIWaltheria little leafMitracarpus hirtus, Saccharum sp., Spermacocci sp., Waltheria indica, Carica papayaNorthern TerritorySchneider et al., 1999; Tran-Nguyen et al., 2000; Padovan and Gibb, 2001; Wilson et al., 2001
IIaustralasiaeTomato big budAchyranthes aspera, Aeschynomene spp., Alysicarpus rugosus, Amaranthus sp., Apium graveolens, Arachis spp., Boeharvia sp., Brugmansia x candida, Capsicum annuum, Carica papaya, Catharanthus roseus, Cajanus cajan, Citrus paradisi, Crotalaria spp., Cenchrus ciliaris, Cichorium intybus, Cleome viscosa, Cucurbita maxima, Cynodon dactylon, Daucus carota, Emilia sonchifolia, Eragrostis falcata, Eriachne obtusa, Euphorbia milii, Evolvulus sp., Gerbera sp., Goodenia sp., Guizotia abyssinica, Ipomoea spp., Lactuca sativa, Lycopersicon esculentum, Macroptilium spp., Medicago sativa, Mucuna pruriens, Passiflora sp., Phlox sp., Physalis minima, Ptilotus distans, Rhynchosia minima, Saccharum sp., Sarcochilus hartmanii × S. falcatus, Sesamum indicum, Sida cordifolia, Lycopersicon esculentum, Solanum melongena, Stylosanthes scabra, Trifolium repens, Vigna spp., Vitis vinifera, Zinnia elegans,Austroagallia torridaNorthern Territory, New South Wales, Queensland, Western Australia, VictoriaGibb et al., 1995; Davis et al., 1997b; Gowanlock et al., 1998; De La Rue et al., 1999; Tran-Nguyen et al., 2000, 2003; Wilson et al., 2001*; Pilkington et al., 2004; Streten and Gibb, 2006
IIaurantifoliaChickpea little leafCicer arietinumWestern AustraliaSaqib et al., 2005
IIaustralasiaePapaya yellow crinkleCarica papayaQueenslandGibb et al., 1996; White et al., 1998
IIaustralasiaePapaya mosaicCarica papayaQueenslandGibb et al., 1996; White et al., 1998
IITree medic witches' broomMedicago arboreaSouth AustraliaYang et al., 2013
IIPigeonpea phyllodyCajanus cajanSouth AustraliaYang et al., 2013
IIPigeon pea little leafArachis spp., Catharanthus roseus, Crotalaria spp., Desmodium triflorum, Indigofera sp., Macroptilium bracteatum Pterocaulon sp. Sesuvium portulacastrum, Stylosanthes spp., Vigna radiataNorthern Territory, Queensland, Torres StraitSchneider et al., 1999; De La Rue et al., 2001; Padovan and Gibb, 2001; Wilson et al., 2001; Davis et al., 2003; Streten and Gibb, 2006
II-DaustralasiaePale purple coneflower witches' broomEchinacea pallidaTasmaniaPearce et al., 2011
II-DaustralasiaeSweet potato little leafAlysicarpus vaginalis, Aphyllodium sp., Arachis spp., Cajanus marmoratus, Carica papaya, Catharanthus roseus, Centrosema pascuorum, Citrus sp., Cleome viscosa, Crotalaria spp., Cucurbita maxima, Cyanthillium spp., Desmodium spp., Emilia sonchifolia, Indigofera spp., Ipomoea batatas, Macroptilium gracile, Medicago sativa, Mitracarpus hirtus, Nicotiana tabacum, Pachyrhizus erosus, Physalis minima, Rhynchosia minima, Senna obtusifolia, Sesamum indicum, Stylosanthes ssp., Tridax procumbens, Vigna spp.Austroagallia torrida, Orosius spp., Batracomorphus sp.Torres Strait, Northern Territory, Western Australia, New South WalesGibb et al., 1995*; Liu et al., 1996; Davis et al., 1997b; Schneider and Gibb, 1997*; De La Rue et al., 1999, 2001; Padovan and Gibb, 2001; Wilson et al., 2001; Davis et al., 2003; Streten and Gibb, 2006; Tairo et al., 2006; Tran-Nguyen et al., 2012
XI-BCynodon white leafCynodon dactylon, Dactyloctenium aegyptiumNorthern Territory, Western AustraliaSchneider et al., 1999; Tran-Nguyen et al., 2000; Blanche et al., 2003
XI-BSorghum grassy shootDactyloctenium spp., Sorghum stipoideum, Whiteochloa spp., Chloris inflata, Whiteochloa cymbiformisWestern Australia, Northern TerritoryTran-Nguyen et al., 2000; Blanche et al., 2003
XIIAustralian lucerne yellowsMedicago sativaNew South WalesGetachew et al., 2007
XIIPapaya diebackCarica papayaQueenslandGibb et al., 1996; White et al., 1998
XII-BaustraliensePumpkin yellow leaf curlCucurbita maxima, C. moschataQueensland, Western Australia, Northern TerritoryStreten et al., 2005
XII-BaustralienseCenchrus bunchy shootCenchrus setigerWestern AustraliaTran-Nguyen et al., 2000
XII-BaustralienseStrawberry green petal diseaseFragaria x ananassaQueenslandPadovan et al., 2000
XII-BaustralienseStrawberry lethal yellowsFragaria x ananassaQueenslandPadovan et al., 2000
XII-BaustralienseAustralian grapevine yellowsbVitis vinifera, Carica papayaSouth Australia, QueenslandDavis et al., 1997a,b; Davis and Sinclair, 1998; Davis et al., 2003
XXIIIcBuckland Valley grapevine yellowsVitis viniferaVictoriaConstable et al., 2003; Streten and Gibb, 2006; Zhao and Davis, 2016
XXVdWeeping tea tree witches' broomMelaleuca spp.QueenslandDavis et al., 2003; Zhao and Davis, 2016
XXXIIIAllocasuarina yellowsAllocasuarina muellerianaSouth AustraliaGibb et al., 2003; Zhao and Davis, 2016
Poinsettia branchingeEuphorbia pulcherrimaSchneider et al., 1999
Galactia little leafGalactia tenuifloraNorthern TerritorySchneider et al., 1999; Padovan and Gibb, 2001
Sorghum bunchy shootSorghum stipoideumTran-Nguyen et al., 2000
Stylosanthes little leafArachis pintoi, Carica papaya, Saccharum sp., Sesuvium portulacastrum, Stylosanthes scabraAustroagallia torrida, Orosius spp., Batracomorphus sp.Northern Territory, Queensland, New South WalesSchneider et al., 1999; Tran-Nguyen et al., 2000; De La Rue et al., 2001; Padovan and Gibb, 2001; Davis et al., 2003; Gopurenko et al., 2016
Sugarcane white leafSaccharum sp.Western Australia, QueenslandTran-Nguyen et al., 2000
Vigna little leafVigna lanceolata, Carica papaya, Tridax procumbensAustroagallia torrida, Batracomorphus sp.Northern AustraliaSchneider et al., 1999; De La Rue et al., 2001; Padovan and Gibb, 2001
Mundulla yellows diseasefEucalyptus camaldulensis, E. baxteri, E. leucoxylonSouth AustraliaHanold et al., 2006
Paulownia witches' broomgPaulownia sp.Western AustraliaBayliss et al., 2005

Denotes reference for vector data.

Location data are from the listed references but not every plant species was diseased in every location.

A new taxon, Ca. Phytoplasma australasia was proposed (White et al., .

Davis and Sinclair (.

Constable et al. (.

Zhao and Davis (.

This phytoplasma has not been found in economically important field crops.

Tentative data only for a phytoplasma etiology.

RFLP patterns showed high similarity to “Candidatus Phytoplasma australiense.”

Taxonomic and biological information on phytoplasmas in Australia (empty cells denote the absence of available information). Denotes reference for vector data. Location data are from the listed references but not every plant species was diseased in every location. A new taxon, Ca. Phytoplasma australasia was proposed (White et al., . Davis and Sinclair (. Constable et al. (. Zhao and Davis (. This phytoplasma has not been found in economically important field crops. Tentative data only for a phytoplasma etiology. RFLP patterns showed high similarity to “Candidatus Phytoplasma australiense.”

Abstract

Phytoplasmas are insect-vectored bacteria that cause disease in a wide range of plant species. The increasing availability of molecular DNA analyses, expertise, and additional methods in recent years has led to a proliferation of discoveries of phytoplasma-plant host associations and in the numbers of taxonomic groupings for phytoplasmas. The widespread use of common names based on the diseases with which they are associated, as well as separate phenetic and taxonomic systems for classifying phytoplasmas based on variation at the 16S rRNA-encoding gene, complicates interpretation of the literature. We explore this issue and related trends through a focus on Australian pathosystems, providing the first comprehensive compilation of information for this continent, covering the phytoplasmas, host plants, vectors, and diseases. Of the 33 16Sr groups reported internationally, only groups II, XI, XII, XXIII, XXV, and XXXIII have been recorded in Australia and this highlights the need for ongoing biosecurity measures to prevent the introduction of additional pathogen groups. Many of the phytoplasmas reported in Australia have not been sufficiently well-studied to assign them to 16Sr groups so it is likely that unrecognized groups and sub-groups are present. Wide host plant ranges are apparent among well studied phytoplasmas, with multiple crop and non-crop species infected by some. Disease management is further complicated by the fact that putative vectors have been identified for few phytoplasmas, especially in Australia. Despite rapid progress in recent years using molecular approaches, phytoplasmas remain the least well-studied group of plant pathogens, making them a “crouching tiger” disease threat.

Issue 2: Complex taxonomic nomenclature, paragraphs 2 and 3

Second, as molecular methods became available, workers were able to group and phenetically classify phytoplasmas using restricted fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of a PCR amplified portion of the 16S rRNA gene with a defined set of restriction enzymes (Lee et al., 1998). The RFLP profiles generated for different phytoplasmas are generally consistent with sequence-based phylogenetic analyses of the 16S rRNA gene, particularly in the co-identification and grouping of related strains. The 33 16Sr groups currently defined each have a similarity of less than 85% compared with any representative phytoplasma from within an established 16Sr group (Zhao and Davis, 2016). Table 1 summarizes available information on the 16Sr groups reported in Australian studies. Of the 33 16Sr groups reported internationally, only groups II, XI, XII, XXIII, XXV, and XXXIII have been recorded in Australia and this highlights the need for ongoing biosecurity measures to prevent the introduction of additional pathogen groups. Third, phytoplasmas are classified in the provisional genus “Candidatus Phytoplasma” (IRPCM, 2004). To date, there are 42 formally described species and ten potentially novel phytoplasma species (Davis et al., 2015). This number exceeds the current number of 16s rRNA groups because some of these groups contain several “Candidatus Phytoplasma” species. At least 100 subgroups are known (Dickinson and Hodgetts, 2013). According to Phytoplasma/Spiroplasma Working Team-Phytoplasma Taxonomy Group, a novel “Ca. Phytoplasma” species description should refer to a single, unique 16S rRNA gene sequence (>1,200 bp), and a strain can be recognized as a novel “Ca. Phytoplasma” species if its 16S rRNA gene sequence has <97.5% similarity to that of any previously described “Ca. Phytoplasma” species (Duduk and Bertaccini, 2011). Additional biological characters such as antibody specificity, host range and vector transmission specificity as well as genetic markers can also be used in an integrative taxonomy approach for species differentiation. Of the 42 recognized “Ca. Phytoplasma” species, only Ca. Phytoplasma aurantifolia, Ca. Phytoplasma australasiae and Ca. Phytoplasma australiense are reported in Australia (Table 1) but uncertainty exists because many papers appear without Ca. Phytoplasma names which are used consistently only in the case of the GenBank database. The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  6 in total

1.  'Candidatus Phytoplasma', a taxon for the wall-less, non-helical prokaryotes that colonize plant phloem and insects.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.747

2.  Phytoplasma identity and disease etiology.

Authors:  R E Davis; W A Sinclair
Journal:  Phytopathology       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.025

3.  "Candidatus phytoplasma australiense," a new phytoplasma taxon associated with Australian grapevine yellows.

Authors:  R E Davis; E L Dally; D E Gundersen; I M Lee; N Habili
Journal:  Int J Syst Bacteriol       Date:  1997-04

4.  Criteria for phytoplasma 16Sr group/subgroup delineation and the need of a platform for proper registration of new groups and subgroups.

Authors:  Yan Zhao; Robert E Davis
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 2.747

5.  Phylogenetic positions of phytoplasmas associated with dieback, yellow crinkle and mosaic diseases of papaya, and their proposed inclusion in 'Candidatus Phytoplasma australiense' and a new taxon, 'Candidatus Phytoplasma australasia'.

Authors:  D T White; L L Blackall; P T Scott; K B Walsh
Journal:  Int J Syst Bacteriol       Date:  1998-07

6.  Expanding and exploring the diversity of phytoplasmas from lucerne (Medicago sativa).

Authors:  David Gopurenko; Murray J Fletcher; Jian Liu; Geoff M Gurr
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.