Literature DB >> 30401604

Second-line cabozantinib versus nivolumab in advanced renal cell carcinoma: Systematic review and indirect treatment comparison.

Camillo Porta1, Cezary Szczylik2, Roman Casciano3, Shuai Fu4, Billy Amzal5, Johanna Lister6, Helene Karcher7, Jie Meng8, Monika Neumann9, Jerome Dinet10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nivolumab and cabozantinib, two new treatment options for previously-treated advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma (aRCC), have recently been approved.
METHODS: Two independent reviewers performed study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. Indirect treatment comparisons were carried out by directly assessing HR differences and statistical modeling of Kaplan-Meier curves from these two trials.
RESULTS: Publications identified showed that no head-to-head comparisons had been carried out. Two indirect treatment comparisons used agreed that there was no significant difference in OS between cabozantinib and nivolumab and that cabozantinib significantly improved PFS compared to nivolumab.
CONCLUSIONS: The field of aRCC treatments is evolving rapidly, creating opportunities for individualized treatments and challenges for clinicians to keep up with the evidence. In lieu of availability of direct comparisons of all options, advanced modeling results presented herein can help to inform and improve personalized treatments.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advanced modeling; Individualized cancer therapy; Treatment algorithm

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30401604     DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2018.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol        ISSN: 1040-8428            Impact factor:   6.312


  4 in total

1.  Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with cabozantinib in the Czech Republic: analysis of four cancer centers.

Authors:  Igor Richter; Alexandr Poprach; Anezka Zemankova; Tomas Buchler; Jiri Bartos; Vladimir Samal; Hana Studentova; Aneta Rozsypalova; Josef Dvorak; Ondrej Brom; Bohuslav Melichar
Journal:  Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 1.245

2.  Acute and Chronic Cardiopulmonary Effects of High Dose Interleukin-2 Therapy: An Observational Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

Authors:  Jakub Lagan; Josephine H Naish; Christien Fortune; Christopher Campbell; Shien Chow; Manon Pillai; Joshua Bradley; Lenin Francis; David Clark; Anita Macnab; Gaetano Nucifora; Rebecca Dobson; Erik B Schelbert; Matthias Schmitt; Robert Hawkins; Christopher A Miller
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-30

3.  Second line therapy with axitinib after only prior sunitinib in metastatic renal cell cancer: Italian multicenter real world SAX study final results.

Authors:  Gaetano Facchini; Sabrina Rossetti; Massimiliano Berretta; Carla Cavaliere; Sarah Scagliarini; Maria Giuseppa Vitale; Chiara Ciccarese; Giuseppe Di Lorenzo; Erica Palesandro; Vincenza Conteduca; Umberto Basso; Emanuele Naglieri; Azzurra Farnesi; Michele Aieta; Nicolò Borsellino; Leonardo La Torre; Gelsomina Iovane; Lucia Bonomi; Donatello Gasparro; Enrico Ricevuto; Michele De Tursi; Rocco De Vivo; Giovanni Lo Re; Francesco Grillone; Paolo Marchetti; Ferdinando De Vita; Claudio Scavelli; Claudio Sini; Salvatore Pisconti; Anna Crispo; Vittorio Gebbia; Antonio Maestri; Luca Galli; Ugo De Giorgi; Roberto Iacovelli; Carlo Buonerba; Giacomo Cartenì; Carmine D'Aniello
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 5.531

Review 4.  Does an Alternative Sunitinib Dosing Schedule Really Improve Survival Outcomes over a Conventional Dosing Schedule in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma? An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Doo Yong Chung; Dong Hyuk Kang; Jong Won Kim; Do Kyung Kim; Joo Yong Lee; Chang Hee Hong; Kang Su Cho
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 6.639

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.