Arnar Geirsson1, Kayoko Shioda2, Christian Olsson3, Anders Ahlsson3, Jarmo Gunn4, Emma C Hansson5, Vibeke Hjortdal6, Anders Jeppsson5, Ari Mennander7, Anders Wickbom8, Igor Zindovic9, Tomas Gudbjartsson10. 1. Section of Cardiac Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. Electronic address: arnar.geirsson@yale.edu. 2. Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Conn. 3. Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. 4. Heart Center, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland. 5. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. 6. Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark. 7. Heart Center Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland. 8. Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Orebro University Hospital and School of Health and Medicine, Orebro University, Orebro, Sweden. 9. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden. 10. Landspitali University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Open-distal anastomosis is the preferred technique over clamp-on technique for surgical repair of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). The aim of this study was to define how outcomes of ATAAD were affected by the use of either technique. METHODS: Nordic Consortium for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection includes 8 academic cardiothoracic hospitals in 4 Nordic countries. The cohort consisted of 1134 patients, 153 clamp-on and 981 open-distal, from 2005 to 2014. RESULTS: Patients who underwent operation with the clamp-on were younger, more frequently had coronary artery disease, bicuspid aortic valve, hypotension/shock or syncope, and a greater PennClass than open-distal patients. Postoperative cerebral vascular accident occurred less frequently in clamp-on (14/153, 10%) compared with the open-distal group (190/981, 20%). Clamp-on had greater 30-day mortality (39/153, 25%) than the open-distal group (158/981, 16%), and 5-year survival was also worse in clamp-on (61.8% ± 4.4%) compared with the open-distal group (73.0% ± 1.6%). The open-distal technique was used more frequently in greater-volume hospitals but was not independently associated with 30-day mortality. Preoperative condition was an independent risk factor whereas hospital volume and later year of operation were beneficial in regard to short-term outcome. Open-distal was independently associated with improved mid-term survival. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent operation with the clamp-on were sicker on presentation and had worse short- and mid-term survival compared with the open-distal group. Patients in the open-distal group had greater rates of cerebrovascular complications. The results support the routine use of open-distal anastomosis as the primary operative strategy for ATAAD, although clamp-on can be performed successfully in select cases. Published by Elsevier Inc.
OBJECTIVES: Open-distal anastomosis is the preferred technique over clamp-on technique for surgical repair of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). The aim of this study was to define how outcomes of ATAAD were affected by the use of either technique. METHODS: Nordic Consortium for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection includes 8 academic cardiothoracic hospitals in 4 Nordic countries. The cohort consisted of 1134 patients, 153 clamp-on and 981 open-distal, from 2005 to 2014. RESULTS:Patients who underwent operation with the clamp-on were younger, more frequently had coronary artery disease, bicuspid aortic valve, hypotension/shock or syncope, and a greater PennClass than open-distal patients. Postoperative cerebral vascular accident occurred less frequently in clamp-on (14/153, 10%) compared with the open-distal group (190/981, 20%). Clamp-on had greater 30-day mortality (39/153, 25%) than the open-distal group (158/981, 16%), and 5-year survival was also worse in clamp-on (61.8% ± 4.4%) compared with the open-distal group (73.0% ± 1.6%). The open-distal technique was used more frequently in greater-volume hospitals but was not independently associated with 30-day mortality. Preoperative condition was an independent risk factor whereas hospital volume and later year of operation were beneficial in regard to short-term outcome. Open-distal was independently associated with improved mid-term survival. CONCLUSIONS:Patients who underwent operation with the clamp-on were sicker on presentation and had worse short- and mid-term survival compared with the open-distal group. Patients in the open-distal group had greater rates of cerebrovascular complications. The results support the routine use of open-distal anastomosis as the primary operative strategy for ATAAD, although clamp-on can be performed successfully in select cases. Published by Elsevier Inc.