Literature DB >> 30401420

[Critically ill patient isolation: risk or protection?]

I Gutiérrez-Cía1, C Aibar-Remón2, B Obón-Azuara3, O Urbano-Gonzalo4, J Moliner-Lahoz5, M T Gea-Velázquez de Castro6, J M Aranaz-Andrés7.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Isolation precautions are an effective measure to prevent the spread of multi-resistant microorganisms (MMR). However, its implementation is complex and can increase some risks to the patient. The aim of this study is to determine whether the implementation of isolation precautions increase the risk of patient safety incidents (PSI) in critically ill patients.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted involving patients admitted to the ICU of a University Hospital, and that required isolation for more than 48h. Period of study: two years (from 2013/03/01 to 2015/03/31). Data source was the electronic medical record. The tools for evaluation were the Modular Review Form questionnaires (MRF1 and MRF2). An analysis was made of PSI and adverse events (AEs) during periods with and without isolation precautions, including the PSI type, severity, and preventability.
RESULTS: The study included a total of 76 patients, 74 of whom had at least one PSI. A total of 798 PSI were detected (511 during isolation period), 599 were a No harm incident (NHI) and 199 were adverse AEs. The most frequent PSIs were associated with medication (316) and patient health care (279). Most of them were moderately or highly preventable. The incidence of PSI during periods with and without isolation was 27.3 (SD 33.8) and 29 (39.6) per 100 patient-days, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: PSIs in ICU are frequent, and the most of them are preventable. The adoption of isolation precautions does not constitute a risk factor for PSI. Improving patient safety culture is essential for an adequate prevention strategy.
Copyright © 2018 FECA. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aislamiento de pacientes; Cuidados críticos; Intensive care; Patient isolation; Patient safety; Seguridad del paciente

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30401420     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhqr.2018.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Healthc Qual Res        ISSN: 2603-6479


  1 in total

1.  Higher incidence of adverse events in isolated patients compared with non-isolated patients: a cohort study.

Authors:  Fátima Jiménez-Pericás; María Teresa Gea Velázquez de Castro; María Pastor-Valero; Carlos Aibar Remón; Juan José Miralles; María Del Carmen Meyer García; Jesús Maria Aranaz Andrés
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 2.692

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.