| Literature DB >> 30400900 |
Babatope O Adebiyi1, Ferdinand C Mukumbang2, Lizahn G Cloete3, Anna-Marie Beytell4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD) is among the leading causes of developmental and intellectual disabilities in individuals. Although efforts are being made toward the prevention and management of FASD in South Africa, the prevalence remains high. The sustained high prevalence could be attributed to several factors, including the lack of policy for a coordinated effort to prevent, diagnose and manage FASD nationally. In this study, our aim was to explore the perspectives of service providers (health and allied professionals, teachers, social workers) on the prevention and management of FASD towards developing a guideline to inform policy.Entities:
Keywords: Development disabilities; Fetal alcohol Spectrum disorders; Guidelines; Interventions; Management; Policies; Prevention; Service providers; Services; Women
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30400900 PMCID: PMC6220472 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-6126-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Relevant government departments’ responsibilities towards the prevention and management of FASD
| Relevant government departments | Responsibilities towards prevention of FASD | Responsibilities towards the management of FASD |
|---|---|---|
| Department of Health | – Estimate prevalence of FAS and FASD | – Developmental screening and referral at birth and infancy. |
| Department of Education | – Provide secondary and tertiary level education for adolescents and young women | – Provide crèches and pre-schools for individuals with FASD |
| Department of Social Development | – Support for women at high alcohol risk and their families. | – Access to social grants. |
| Department of Justice, Safety, and Security | – Enforcing liquor laws | – Vulnerable to physical and sexual abuse and domestic violence |
| Department of Labour | – Work-related skills training for Individuals with FASD | – Maternity leave for women to ensure early proper management for individuals with FASD |
Characteristics of the study participants
| Characteristics | Participants ( |
|---|---|
| Types of institutions | |
| Schools | 3 |
| Healthcare facilities | 4 |
| NPOs | 2 |
| Gender | |
| Male | 5 |
| Female | 60 |
| Profession | |
| Allied health | 20 |
| Medical | 10 |
| Nurse | 6 |
| Teacher | 26 |
| Others | 3 |
| Working experience (years) | |
| 1–10 | 33 |
| 11–20 | 19 |
| 21–30 | 10 |
| 31–40 | 3 |
Coding guide
| Categories | Themes | Sub-themes |
|---|---|---|
| Availability (lack) of policies/ guidelines on FASD | No specific guideline/policy document on FASD | |
| Clauses in other guidelines/policy documents | ||
| Development of guideline/policy document | There is a need to develop separate guideline/policy document | |
| There is no need to develop separate guideline/policy document | ||
| Current practices and available interventions | Prevention-related interventions | Clinical prevention interventions |
| Educational prevention interventions | ||
| Social prevention interventions | ||
| Management-related interventions | Clinical management interventions | |
| Educational management interventions | ||
| Social management Interventions | ||
| Identified policy requirements for FASD | Prevention-related interventions | Clinical prevention policy requirements |
| Educational prevention policy requirements | ||
| Social prevention policy requirements | ||
| Management-related interventions | Clinical management policy requirements | |
| Educational management policy requirements | ||
| Social management policy requirements |
Exploring service providers’ perspectives on the prevention and management of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders in South Africa: A qualitative study
| No. Item | Guide questions/description | Reported on Page # |
|---|---|---|
| Domain 1: Research team and reflexivity | ||
|
| ||
| 1. Interviewer/facilitator | Which author/s conducted the interview or focus group? | Results (5) |
| 2. Credentials | What were the researcher’s credentials? E.g. PhD, MD | Babatope O. Adebiyi |
| 3. Occupation | What was their occupation at the time of the study? | Student, |
| 4. Gender | Was the researcher male or female? | Male, |
| 5. Experience and training | What experience or training did the researcher have? | Methods (5) |
|
| ||
| 6. Relationship established | Was a relationship established prior to study commencement? | (4) Yes |
| 7. Participant knowledge of the interviewer | What did the participants know about the researcher? e.g. personal goals, reasons for doing the research | (4) Participant information |
| 8. Interviewer characteristics | What characteristics were reported about the inter viewer/facilitator? e.g. Bias, assumptions, reasons and interests in the research topic | Methods (5) |
| Domain 2: study design | ||
| | ||
| 9. Methodological orientation and Theory | What methodological orientation was stated to underpin the study? e.g. grounded theory, discourse analysis, ethnography, phenomenology, content analysis | Methods (4, 5) |
|
| ||
| 10. Sampling | How were participants selected? e.g. purposive, convenience, consecutive, snowball | Methods (4) |
| 11. Method of approach | How were participants approached? e.g. face-to-face, telephone, mail, email | Methods (4) |
| 12. Sample size | How many participants were in the study? | Results (4) |
| 13. Non-participation | How many people refused to participate or dropped out? Reasons? | Methods (4) |
|
| ||
| 14. Setting of data collection | Where was the data collected? e.g. home, clinic, workplace | Methods (5) |
| 15. Presence of non-participants | Was anyone else present besides the participants and researchers? | Results (5) |
| 16. Description of sample | What are the important characteristics of the sample? e.g. demographic data, date | Results (4) |
|
| ||
| 17. Interview guide | Were questions, prompts, guides provided by the authors? Was it pilot tested? | Methods (5) |
| 18. Repeat interviews | Were repeat interviews carried out? If yes, how many? | N/A |
| 19. Audio/visual recording | Did the research use audio or visual recording to collect the data? | Methods (5) |
| 20. Field notes | Were field notes made during and/or after the interview or focus group? | Methods (5) |
| 21. Duration | What was the duration of the inter views or focus group? | Methods (5) |
| 22. Data saturation | Was data saturation discussed? | Methods (5) |
| 23. Transcripts returned | Were transcripts returned to participants for comment and/or correction? | N/A |
| Domain 3: analysis and findings | ||
| | ||
| 24. Number of data coders | How many data coders coded the data? | Methods (5) |
| 25. Description of the coding tree | Did authors provide a description of the coding tree? | No |
| 26. Derivation of themes | Were themes identified in advance or derived from the data? | Methods (5) |
| 27. Software | What software, if applicable, was used to manage the data? | N/A |
| 28. Participant checking | Did participants provide feedback on the findings? | Strengths and limitations |
|
| ||
| 29. Quotations presented | Were participant quotations presented to illustrate the themes/findings? Was each quotation identified? e.g. participant number | Results (5–11) |
| 30. Data and findings consistent | Was there consistency between the data presented and the findings? | Result and Discussion (5–13) |
| 31. Clarity of major themes | Were major themes clearly presented in the findings? | Results (5–11) |
| 32. Clarity of minor themes | Is there a description of diverse cases or discussion of minor themes? | Discussion (11–13) |