| Literature DB >> 30400537 |
Jianbin Guo1, Jinling Wang2, Shengkui Zeng3, Vadim V Silberschmidt4, Yongguang Shen5.
Abstract
Potential problems induced by the multilayered manufacturing process pose a serious threat to the long-term reliability of MEMSCAP® actuators under in-service thermal cycling. Damage would initiate and propagate in different material layers because of a large mismatch of their thermal expansions. In this research, residual stresses and variations of design parameters induced by metal multi-user micro electromechanical system processes (MetalMUMPs) were examined to evaluate their effects on the thermal fatigue lifetime of the multilayer structure and, thus, to improve MEMSCAP® design. Since testing in such micro internal structure is difficult to conduct and traditional testing schemes are destructive, a numerical subdomain method based on a finite element technique was employed. Thermomechanical deformation from metal to insulator layers under in-service temperature cycling (obtained from the multiphysics model of the entire actuator, which was validated by experimental and specified analytical solutions) was accurately estimated to define failures with a significant efficiency and feasibility. Simulation results showed that critical failure modes included interface delamination, plastic deformation, micro cracking, and thermal fatigue, similarly to what was concluded in the MEMSCAP® technical report.Entities:
Keywords: manufacturing process; micro electromechanical systems (MEMS); multilayer structure; residual stresses; subdomain method
Year: 2017 PMID: 30400537 PMCID: PMC6187910 DOI: 10.3390/mi8120348
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Micromachines (Basel) ISSN: 2072-666X Impact factor: 2.891
Figure 1Micro actuator assembled in micro electromechanical systems (MEMS) devices. Reproduced with permission from [23].
Figure 2Two-hot-beam thermal actuator: A passive beam (“cold” arm) carries the electrical information, and two active beams (“hot” arms) are used for actuation; a dielectric barrier is between the passive and active beams. Reproduced with permission from [23].
Figure 3Cross section of the actuator and corresponding materials of the joint layers.
Figure 4(a) 3D representation of the studied multilayer MEMSCAP® switch and (b) detail of the cantilever beams.
Figure 5(a) Von mises stresses obtained with the verified function model of actuators and (b) subdomain multilayer structure of the micro actuator.
Figure 6Verification of the simplified multiphysics simulations by analytical solutions and experimental data: (a) peak values of temperature with applied voltages (U) from 1 V to 10 V; (b) maximum stresses with applied voltages (U) from 1 V to 10 V; (c) displacement of the contact tip with applied voltages (U) from 1 V to 10 V; (d) transient temperature distribution of Lh1 at U = 5 V for type I boundary conditions; (e) transient temperature distribution of Lh2 at U = 5 V for type I boundary conditions. Reproduced with permission from [23].
Material and geometrical properties of the multilayer structure.
| Materials | Colour |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Si | 20 | 130 | 0.28 | 3.1 | 3790 | - | - | 130 | |
| SiO2 | 2 | 71.4 | 0.16 | 0.52 | 486 | - | - | 1.4 | |
| Si3N4 | 0.65 | 260 | 0.25 | 3.2 | 460 | - | - | 20 | |
| Polysilicon | 0.7 | 160 | 0.23 | 2.6 | 1200 | - | - | 78 | |
| Cu | 0.55 | 110 | 0.3 | 17 | Equation (4) | 480 | 77 | 400 | |
| Ni | 20 | Equation (2) | 0.31 | Equation (3) | 270 | 4000 | 4 | 90.7 | |
| Au | 0.5 | 75 | 0.42 | 14.2 | 100 | - | - | Equation (1) |
Figure 7Thermal loadings include cooling and cycling process.
Figure 8Subdomain configuration.
Figure 9Dynamic displacement conditions along the faces A1 and A2 in time steps; the temperature is shown in the inset.
Figure 10Distribution of von Mises stress in the multilayer structure.
Figure 11Distribution of plastic strain in the multilayer structure.
Figure 12Distributions of von Mises stresses and plastic strains during the first half-cycle and their locations in the structure (g): along the lines AB (a); BC (b); DE (c); EF (d); BE (e,f).
Figure 13Plastic strain changes with time for three different interfaces: copper–nitride, copper–polysilicon and nitride–gold.
Figure 14Von mises stress concentration at the copper–polysilicon interfaces at different cooling rate.
Estimation of fatigue lifetime for different cooling rates.
| Case | Residual Stresses | Maximum Plastic Strain | Parameter | Fatigue Life |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| i | None | 0.663 | −0.5 | 1819 |
| −0.7 | 174 | |||
| ii | Rate I | 0.655 | −0.5 | 1864 |
| −0.7 | 177 | |||
| iii | Rate II | 0. 660 | −0.5 | 1836 |
| −0.7 | 175 | |||
| v | Rate IV | 0.98 | −0.5 | 832 |
| −0.7 | 100 |
Parameters of cases used to study the effect of variations of geometrical and material parameters.
| Case | Young’s Modulus | Coefficient of Thermal ExpansionCTE | Thermal Conductivity | Thickness of Copper: |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| a | {70, 90, 110, 130, 150} | 17 | 400 | 0.55 |
| b | 110 | {13, 15, 17, 19, 21} | 400 | 0.55 |
| c | 110 | 17 | {200, 300, 400, 500, 600} | 0.55 |
| d | 110 | 17 | 400 | {0.35, 0.45, 0.55, 0.65, 0.75} |
Estimates of fatigue life.
| Case | Maximum Plastic Strain | Parameter | Fatigue Life |
|---|---|---|---|
| a | {0.82, 0.75, | −0.5 | {1189, 1422, |
| −0.7 | {129, 146, | ||
| b | {0.591, 0.661, | −0.5 | {2290, 1830, |
| −0.7 | {206, 175, | ||
| c | {0.733, 0.733, | −0.5 | {1488, 1488, 1582, 1488, 1488} |
| −0.7 | {151, 151, 158, 151, 151} | ||
| d | {1.02, 0.93, | −0.5 | {768, 924, |
| −0.7 | {94, 107, 151, 201, 264} |