| Literature DB >> 30400500 |
María José González-Vázquez1,2, Mathieu Hautefeuille3,4.
Abstract
We present a study of the application of a single-step and solvent-free laser-based strategy to control the formation of polymer-derived fluorescent carbon nanodomains embedded in poly-dimethylsiloxane (PDMS) microchannels. A low-power, laser-induced microplasma was used to produce a localised combustion of a PDMS surface and confine nanocarbon byproducts within the exposed microregions. Patterns with on-demand geometries were achieved under dry environmental conditions thanks to a low-cost 3-axis CD-DVD platform motorised in a selective laser ablation fashion. The high temperature required for combustion of PDMS was achieved locally by strongly focusing the laser spot on the desired areas, and the need for high-power laser was bypassed by coating the surface with an absorbing carbon additive layer, hence making the etching of a transparent material possible. The simple and repeatable fabrication process and the spectroscopic characterisation of resulting fluorescent microregions are reported. In situ Raman and fluorescence spectroscopy were used to identify the nature of the nanoclusters left inside the modified areas and their fluorescence spectra as a function of excitation wavelength. Interestingly, the carbon nanodomains left inside the etched micropatterns showed a strong dependency on the additive materials and laser energy that were used to achieve the incandescence and etch microchannels on the surface of the polymer. This dependence on the lasing conditions indicates that our cost-effective laser ablation technique may be used to tune the nature of the polymer-derived nanocarbons, useful for photonics applications in transparent silicones in a rapid-prototyping fashion.Entities:
Keywords: carbon nanodomains; fluorescence; laser ablation; poly-dimethylsiloxane (PDMS)
Year: 2017 PMID: 30400500 PMCID: PMC6189974 DOI: 10.3390/mi8100307
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Micromachines (Basel) ISSN: 2072-666X Impact factor: 2.891
Figure 1Diagram of the low-cost fabrication process used to generate laser-induced incandescence on poly-dimethylsiloxane (PDMS) coated with a nanocarbon additive.
Figure 2(a) SEM micrograph of a typical PDMS laser-etched region and (b) the experimental relationship between pixel resolution and laser intensity during ablation. The data presented are averaged over more than 20 values measured for five different laser intensities and the standard deviation is shown.
Figure 3Comparison of Raman spectra (a) and Fluorescence emission spectra (b,c) of modified PDMS zones previously coated with single wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNT) at different wavelengths (b) for 325 nm excitation source and (c) for 405 nm excitation source.
Figure 4(a) Comparison of Raman spectra and Fluorescence emission spectra (b,c) of modified PDMS zones previously coated with multi-wall carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) at different wavelengths (b) for 325 nm excitation source and (c) for 405 nm excitation source.
Figure 5(a) Comparison of Raman spectra and Fluorescence emission spectra (b,c) of modified PDMS zones previously coated with fullerenes (C60) at different wavelengths (b) for 325 nm excitation source and (c) for 405 nm excitation source.
Average position for D and G bands for each laser power density used for modifying the sample coated with SWCNT and their respective ID/IG.
| Laser Power Density | D Band Position (cm−1) | G Band Position (cm−1) | ID/IG |
|---|---|---|---|
| Im | 1460 (±2.5) | 1588 (±1.7) | 0.9 (±0.4) |
| IM | 1458 (±2.8) | 1588 (±2.3) | 2.3 (±0.9) |
Average position for D and G bands for each laser power density used for modifying the sample coated with multi-wall carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) and their respective ID/IG.
| Laser Power Density | D Band Position (cm−1) | G Band Position (cm−1) | ID/IG |
|---|---|---|---|
| Im | 1351 (±1.4) | 1593 (±1.8) | 0.8 (±0.1) |
| IM | 1350 (±4.6) | 1595 (±0.2) | 0.9 (±0.1) |
Average position for D and G bands for each laser power density used for modifying the sample coated with MWCNT and their respective ID/IG.
| Laser Power Density | D Band Position (cm−1) | G Band Position (cm−1) | ID/IG |
|---|---|---|---|
| Im | 1463 (±1.3) | 1569 (±1.7) | 3.8 (±0.8) |
| IM | 1461 (±1.4) | 1564 (±2.5) | 6 (±0.6) |