Literature DB >> 30399030

Inappropriate Questions Asked of Female Orthopaedic Surgery Applicants From 1971 to 2015: A Cross-sectional Study.

Daniel D Bohl1, Stephanie E Iantorno, Monica Kogan.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Civil Rights Act prohibits employers from making employment decisions based on sex, race, color, religion, or national origin. Questions regarding these topics during a residency interview are therefore prohibited.
METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to all female orthopaedic surgeons who had an e-mail address in the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons directory. Participants were asked to describe what, if any, inappropriate questions they were asked during interviews.
RESULTS: Four hundred eighty-eight of 997 invited female orthopaedic surgeons completed the questionnaire (48.9%). Their residency interviews took place from 1971 to 2015. Overall, 61.7% of participants were asked an inappropriate question during an interview. This proportion neither increased nor decreased from 1971 to 2015 (P = 0.315). The most common themes of questions included "raising children during residency" (37.9%), "marital status" (32.4%), and "pregnancy during residency" (29.7%). Of those who were asked an inappropriate question, only 1.4% reported the inappropriate question to authorities. DISCUSSION: The present study suggests that over half of female applicants have been asked inappropriate questions at orthopaedic surgery residency interviews, and that there has been no improvement in that percentage over nearly five decades. It is the responsibility those interviewing to be aware of this issue and to be in compliance with national guidelines. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30399030     DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00868

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg        ISSN: 1067-151X            Impact factor:   3.020


  6 in total

Review 1.  Gender-Based Microaggressions in Surgery: A Scoping Review of the Global Literature.

Authors:  Holly N Sprow; Nathaniel F Hansen; Hannah E Loeb; Caroline L Wight; Rolvix H Patterson; Dominique Vervoort; Eliana E Kim; Raphael Greving; Adelina Mazhiqi; Kathryn Wall; Jacquelyn Corley; Emily Anderson; Kathryn Chu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Women in Orthopedics and their Fellowship Choice: What Influenced their Specialty Choice?

Authors:  Kathryn M Jurenovich; Lisa K Cannada
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2020

3.  How Long Will It Take to Reach Gender Parity in Orthopaedic Surgery in the United States? An Analysis of the National Provider Identifier Registry.

Authors:  Alexander J Acuña; Eleanor H Sato; Tarun K Jella; Linsen T Samuel; Stacy H Jeong; Antonia F Chen; Atul F Kamath
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  CORR Insights®: What is the Geographic Distribution of Women Orthopaedic Surgeons Throughout the United States?

Authors:  Anthony E Johnson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  Bias Mitigation in Cardiothoracic Recruitment.

Authors:  Cherie Parungo Erkmen; Lauren Kane; David T Cooke
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2020-07-18       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  A 15-Year Report on the Uneven Distribution of Women in Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Training Programs in the United States.

Authors:  Ann E Van Heest; Julie Agel; Julie Balch Samora
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2021-05-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.