Literature DB >> 3039873

Effect of intrathecal bupivacaine on somatosensory evoked potentials following dermatomal stimulation.

C Lund, P Selmar, O B Hansen, H Kehlet.   

Abstract

The effect of spinal anesthesia with 3.6 +/- 0.1 ml (mean +/- SEM) of 0.5% bupivacaine on early (less than 150 msec) somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) with electrical stimulation of the L1 and S1 dermatomes was examined in 12 patients. The mean level of sensory analgesia (pinprick) was T8,9 +/- 1.0 (+/- SEM) and the mean degree of motor blockade was 1.3 +/- 0.1 (Bromage scale). Intrathecal bupivacaine significantly (P less than 0.05) decreased the amplitude of all SEP components after stimulation of the L1 dermatome and most components during stimulation of the S1 dermatome. Intrathecal bupivacaine also increased the latency of SEPs (P less than 0.05) of both dermatomes. The L1 SEP disappeared in 7 and the S1 SEPs in 5 of the 12 patients during neural blockade. In three patients the SEPs disappeared at both locations. Sensory thresholds increased significantly during blockade. We found no correlation between decrease of amplitude and degree of motor blockade or level of sensory analgesia. Thus, intrathecal plain bupivacaine has a strong depressant effect on the neural afferent transmission as assessed by SEPs. However, despite clinically effective blockade as assessed by pinprick and motor blockade nerve potentials after nociceptive stimulation within the area of sensory block were often able to pass to the cerebral cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3039873

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  3 in total

Review 1.  Surgically induced neuropathic pain: understanding the perioperative process.

Authors:  David Borsook; Barry D Kussman; Edward George; Lino R Becerra; Dennis W Burke
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Intrathecal fentanyl prolongs sensory bupivacaine spinal block.

Authors:  H Singh; J Yang; K Thornton; A H Giesecke
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 3.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of epidural and spinal anaesthesia.

Authors:  A G Burm
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 6.447

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.