Literature DB >> 30396845

Is Long-Term Anticoagulation Required after Stent Placement for Benign Superior Vena Cava Syndrome?

Mustafa M Haddad1, Scott M Thompson2, Ian R McPhail3, Emily C Bendel4, Manju Kalra5, Andrew H Stockland2, Newton B Neidert4, James C Andrews2, Sanjay Misra2, Haraldur Bjarnason2, Melissa J Neisen2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify whether symptom relief and stent patency vary with use of long-term anticoagulation after stent placement for benign superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with benign SVC syndrome treated with stent placement between January 1999 and July 2017 were retrospectively identified (n = 58). Average age was 49 years (range, 24-80 y); 34 (58%) were women, and 24 (42%) were men. Average follow-up was 2.4 years (range, 0.1-11.1 y, SD 2.6). Of cases, 37 (64%) were due to a long-term line/pacemaker, and 21 (36%) were due to fibrosing mediastinitis. After stent placement, 36 (62%) patients were placed on long-term anticoagulation, and 22 (38%) were not placed on anticoagulation. Percent stenosis was evaluated on follow-up imaging by dividing smallest diameter of the stent by a normal nonstenotic segment of the stent and multiplying by 100.
RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in all cases. There was no significant difference in number of patients who reported a return of symptoms characteristic of benign SVC syndrome between the anticoagulated (16 of 36; 44.4%) and nonanticoagulated (11 of 22; 50%) groups (P = .68). There was no significant difference in the mean percent stenosis between the anticoagulated (40.4% ± 34.7% [range, 0-100%]) and nonanticoagulated (32.1% ± 29.2% [range, 1.7%-100%]) groups (P = .36). No significant difference was found in the time (days) between date of procedure and date of return of symptoms (anticoagulated, 735.9 d ± 1,003.1 [range, 23-3,851 d]; nonanticoagulated, 478 d ± 826.6 [range, 28-2,922 d]) (P = .49). There was no difference in primary patency between groups (P = .59). Finally, 1 patient (2.8%) in the anticoagulated group required surgical intervention, whereas none in the nonanticoagulated group required surgical intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference was observed in clinical and treatment outcomes in patients who did and did not receive anticoagulation after stent placement for benign SVC syndrome. Management of benign SVC syndrome after stent placement may not require anticoagulation if confirmed by additional studies.
Copyright © 2018 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30396845     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.07.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  4 in total

Review 1.  Superior Vena Cava Syndrome: Etiologies, Manifestations, and Treatments.

Authors:  Keith B Quencer
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 1.780

2.  Superior vena cava syndrome: endovascular management.

Authors:  Walter Kegham Karakhanian; Walter Zavem Karakhanian; Sergio Quilici Belczak
Journal:  J Vasc Bras       Date:  2019-09-24

Review 3.  Endovascular Stenting in Superior Vena Cava Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Eri Yin-Soe Aung; Maha Khan; Norman Williams; Usman Raja; Mohamad Hamady
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 2.797

4.  Effectiveness of sharp recanalization of superior vena cava-right atrium junction occlusion.

Authors:  Xiao-Wen Wu; Xu-Ya Zhao; Xing Li; Jun-Xiang Li; Zong-Yang Liu; Zhi Huang; Ling Zhang; Chong-Yang Sima; Yu Huang; Lei Chen; Shi Zhou
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 1.337

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.