Joseph W Owen1, Nael E Saad2, Glenn Foster3, Kathryn J Fowler3. 1. Department of Radiology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, 800 Rose Street, HX315A, Lexington, KY 40536-0293. Electronic address: Jwowen2@uky.edu. 2. Department of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York. 3. Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To demonstrate the feasibility of detecting patency, stenosis, or occlusion of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) with four-dimensional (4D) flow MR imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sequential adult patients with TIPS were eligible for enrollment. Volumetric phase-contrast sequence was used to image TIPS. Particle tracing cine images were used for qualitative assessment of stenosis. TIPS was segmented to generate quantitative data sets of peak velocity. Segmentation and quantitative measurement of flow throughout an entire TIPS defined technical success. Doppler US was used for comparison. Venography, when available, and 6-month clinical follow-up were used as reference standards. RESULTS: 4D flow MR imaging was performed in 23 patient encounters and was technically successful in 16/23 (69.6%) encounters. Three cases demonstrated both focal turbulence and abnormal velocities (> 190 cm/s or < 90 cm/s) on 4D flow and had venography-confirmed stenosis (true-positive cases). Seven cases had normal velocities and no turbulence on 4D flow, and all were confirmed negative with clinical follow-up or venography (true-negative cases). Six cases had discordant 4D flow results, with abnormal velocities but no turbulence or focal turbulence but normal velocities. All 6 discordant cases had no evidence of dysfunction during 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: 4D flow MR imaging can detect TIPS patency and stenosis, but further investigation is required before it can be used to assess for TIPS dysfunction.
PURPOSE: To demonstrate the feasibility of detecting patency, stenosis, or occlusion of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) with four-dimensional (4D) flow MR imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sequential adult patients with TIPS were eligible for enrollment. Volumetric phase-contrast sequence was used to image TIPS. Particle tracing cine images were used for qualitative assessment of stenosis. TIPS was segmented to generate quantitative data sets of peak velocity. Segmentation and quantitative measurement of flow throughout an entire TIPS defined technical success. Doppler US was used for comparison. Venography, when available, and 6-month clinical follow-up were used as reference standards. RESULTS: 4D flow MR imaging was performed in 23 patient encounters and was technically successful in 16/23 (69.6%) encounters. Three cases demonstrated both focal turbulence and abnormal velocities (> 190 cm/s or < 90 cm/s) on 4D flow and had venography-confirmed stenosis (true-positive cases). Seven cases had normal velocities and no turbulence on 4D flow, and all were confirmed negative with clinical follow-up or venography (true-negative cases). Six cases had discordant 4D flow results, with abnormal velocities but no turbulence or focal turbulence but normal velocities. All 6 discordant cases had no evidence of dysfunction during 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: 4D flow MR imaging can detect TIPS patency and stenosis, but further investigation is required before it can be used to assess for TIPS dysfunction.
Authors: R Y Kanterman; M D Darcy; W D Middleton; K M Sterling; S A Teefey; T K Pilgram Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 1997-02 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Caitlin E Carr; Catherine M Tuite; Michael C Soulen; Richard D Shlansky-Goldberg; Timothy W I Clark; Jeffrey I Mondschein; Andrew Kwak; Aalpen A Patel; Beverly G Coleman; Scott O Trerotola Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Jean-Pierre M Charon; Fida H Alaeddin; Sheena A Pimpalwar; Dominic M Fay; Simon P Olliff; Ralph W Jackson; Richard D Edwards; Iain R Robertson; John D Rose; Jonathan G Moss Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Geert Maleux; Frederik Nevens; Alexander Wilmer; Sam Heye; Chris Verslype; Maria Thijs; Guy Wilms Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2004-06-25 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: M Lafortune; J P Martinet; A Denys; H Patriquin; M Dauzat; M P Dufresne; L Colombato; G Pomier-Layrargues Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 1995-04 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Thekla H Oechtering; Grant S Roberts; Nikolaos Panagiotopoulos; Oliver Wieben; Alejandro Roldán-Alzate; Scott B Reeder Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Date: 2021-11-27
Authors: Jason Chiang; Michael Loecher; Kevin Moulin; M Franca Meloni; Steven S Raman; Justin P McWilliams; Daniel B Ennis; Edward W Lee Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2020-03-13 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Ryan L Brunsing; Dustin Brown; Hashem Almahoud; Yuko Kono; Rohit Loomba; Irene Vodkin; Claude B Sirlin; Marcus T Alley; Shreyas S Vasanawala; Albert Hsiao Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2021-02-16 Impact factor: 5.119