Literature DB >> 30396643

Is there a correlation between 3T multiparametric MRI and molecular subtypes of breast cancer?

Stefania Montemezzi1, Lucia Camera2, Maria Grazia Giri3, Alice Pozzetto2, Anna Caliò4, Gabriele Meliadò3, Francesca Caumo5, Carlo Cavedon3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To test whether 3 T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mMRI) provides information related to molecular subtypes of breast cancer.
METHODS: Women with mammographic or US findings of breast lesions (BI-RADS 4-5) underwent 3 T mMRI (DCE, DWI and MR spectroscopy). The histological type of breast cancer was assessed. Estrogen-receptor (ER), progesterone-receptor (PgR), Ki-67 status and HER-2 expression, assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC), defined four molecular subtypes: Luminal-A, Luminal-B, HER2-enriched and triple-negative. Non-parametric tests (Kruskal-Wallis, k-sample equality of medians, and Mann-Whitney), logistic regression or ANOVA, and a multivariate analysis were performed to investigate correlations between the four molecular subtypes and mMRI (lesion volume, margins or distribution, enhancement pattern, ADC, type of kinetic curve, and total choline (tCho) signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR)). A ROC analysis was finally performed to test the diagnostic power of a multivariate logistic regression model.
RESULTS: 433 patients (453 lesions) were considered. Volume was smaller in Luminal-B and larger in triple-negative tumours compared to the other subtypes combined. Margins were significantly correlated to Luminal-A and Luminal-B. The type of curve was significantly correlated to Luminal-A. ADC values were higher in Luminal-A. tCho SNR was higher in triple-negative tumours. The ROC analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) significantly improved when multiple MRI features were used compared to individual parameters.
CONCLUSIONS: A significant correlation was found between some MRI features and molecular subtypes of breast tumours. A multiparametric approach improved the diagnostic power of MRI. However, further research is needed in order to predict the molecular subtype on the sole basis of mMRI.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast; Breast cancer; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prognostic factors; Triple negative breast neoplasms

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30396643     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.09.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  14 in total

1.  Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Different Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hans-Jonas Meyer; Andreas Wienke; Alexey Surov
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Can apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) distinguish breast cancer from benign breast findings? A meta-analysis based on 13 847 lesions.

Authors:  Alexey Surov; Hans Jonas Meyer; Andreas Wienke
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  The Application of Radiomics in Breast MRI: A Review.

Authors:  Dong-Man Ye; Hao-Tian Wang; Tao Yu
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec

4.  Is Elevated Choline on Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy a Reliable Marker of Breast Lesion Malignancy?

Authors:  Natasa Prvulovic Bunovic; Olivera Sveljo; Dusko Kozic; Jasmina Boban
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Multi-Parametric MRI-Based Radiomics Models for Predicting Molecular Subtype and Androgen Receptor Expression in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Yuhong Huang; Lihong Wei; Yalan Hu; Nan Shao; Yingyu Lin; Shaofu He; Huijuan Shi; Xiaoling Zhang; Ying Lin
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 6.  Breast Cancer Subtypes and Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systemic Review.

Authors:  Toshiki Kazama; Taro Takahara; Jun Hashimoto
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-28

7.  Correlation of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted MR imaging with prognostic factors and subtypes of breast cancers.

Authors:  Hui Chen; Wei Li; Chao Wan; Jue Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 5.738

8.  Characterization of breast cancer subtypes based on quantitative assessment of intratumoral heterogeneity using dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jin Joo Kim; Jin You Kim; Hie Bum Suh; Lee Hwangbo; Nam Kyung Lee; Suk Kim; Ji Won Lee; Ki Seok Choo; Kyung Jin Nam; Taewoo Kang; Heeseung Park
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Computer-Aided Diagnosis Evaluation of the Correlation Between Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Molecular Subtypes in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Wei Meng; Yunfeng Sun; Haibin Qian; Xiaodan Chen; Qiujie Yu; Nanding Abiyasi; Shaolei Yan; Haiyong Peng; Hongxia Zhang; Xiushi Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Ultrasonographic morphological characteristics determined using a deep learning-based computer-aided diagnostic system of breast cancer.

Authors:  Young Seon Kim; Seung Eun Lee; Jung Min Chang; Soo-Yeon Kim; Young Kyung Bae
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.