Andreia Vieira1, Ana Mafalda Reis2, Luís Carlos Matos3, Jorge Machado4, António Moreira5. 1. ICBAS - Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of Porto, 4099-030, Porto, Portugal; Santa Maria Health School, 4049-024, Porto, Portugal; Laboratory of Applied Physiology, ICBAS - Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of Porto, 4099-030, Porto, Portugal. Electronic address: andreia.vieira@santamariasaude.pt. 2. Laboratory of Applied Physiology, ICBAS - Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of Porto, 4099-030, Porto, Portugal. 3. Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, s/n, 4200-465, Porto, Portugal. 4. ICBAS - Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of Porto, 4099-030, Porto, Portugal; Laboratory of Applied Physiology, ICBAS - Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of Porto, 4099-030, Porto, Portugal. 5. Sport Sciences School of Rio Maior, 2040-413, Rio Maior, Portugal.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Auriculotherapy is a therapeutic technique used for a wide variety of conditions. Nevertheless, similarly to any health related intervention, the clinical use of this therapy requires scientific evidence of effectiveness in order to support its rational use. The main goal of this article is to critically analyze published literature on auriculotherapy and to provide an overview of the effectiveness of this technique in the management of health disorders. METHODS: The inventory of published reviews on this subject was carried out in November 2017, by assessing the following computerized databases: PubMed, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EBMR, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CINAHL Plus NRC and Science Direct. Were only considered the systematic reviews based on meta-analysis with high methodological quality described according to AMSTAR (Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews). The eligible articles were systematically reviewed to find out in which health conditions auriculotherapy can be used with effectiveness. RESULTS: A total of 14 reviews were eligible according to the inclusion and exclusion criterions. Those reviews were focused on the management of insomnia, smoking cessation and pain, within the clinical scope of Neurology, Orthopaedics and Rheumatology. CONCLUSIONS: Auriculotherapy has shown to have positive effects while associated to conventional treatments of insomnia, chronic and acute pain. Further well designed studies are required to evaluate the effectiveness of this technique in the treatment of other health conditions.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Auriculotherapy is a therapeutic technique used for a wide variety of conditions. Nevertheless, similarly to any health related intervention, the clinical use of this therapy requires scientific evidence of effectiveness in order to support its rational use. The main goal of this article is to critically analyze published literature on auriculotherapy and to provide an overview of the effectiveness of this technique in the management of health disorders. METHODS: The inventory of published reviews on this subject was carried out in November 2017, by assessing the following computerized databases: PubMed, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EBMR, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CINAHL Plus NRC and Science Direct. Were only considered the systematic reviews based on meta-analysis with high methodological quality described according to AMSTAR (Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews). The eligible articles were systematically reviewed to find out in which health conditions auriculotherapy can be used with effectiveness. RESULTS: A total of 14 reviews were eligible according to the inclusion and exclusion criterions. Those reviews were focused on the management of insomnia, smoking cessation and pain, within the clinical scope of Neurology, Orthopaedics and Rheumatology. CONCLUSIONS: Auriculotherapy has shown to have positive effects while associated to conventional treatments of insomnia, chronic and acute pain. Further well designed studies are required to evaluate the effectiveness of this technique in the treatment of other health conditions.
Authors: Adam D Farmer; Adam Strzelczyk; Alessandra Finisguerra; Alexander V Gourine; Alireza Gharabaghi; Alkomiet Hasan; Andreas M Burger; Andrés M Jaramillo; Ann Mertens; Arshad Majid; Bart Verkuil; Bashar W Badran; Carlos Ventura-Bort; Charly Gaul; Christian Beste; Christopher M Warren; Daniel S Quintana; Dorothea Hämmerer; Elena Freri; Eleni Frangos; Eleonora Tobaldini; Eugenijus Kaniusas; Felix Rosenow; Fioravante Capone; Fivos Panetsos; Gareth L Ackland; Gaurav Kaithwas; Georgia H O'Leary; Hannah Genheimer; Heidi I L Jacobs; Ilse Van Diest; Jean Schoenen; Jessica Redgrave; Jiliang Fang; Jim Deuchars; Jozsef C Széles; Julian F Thayer; Kaushik More; Kristl Vonck; Laura Steenbergen; Lauro C Vianna; Lisa M McTeague; Mareike Ludwig; Maria G Veldhuizen; Marijke De Couck; Marina Casazza; Marius Keute; Marom Bikson; Marta Andreatta; Martina D'Agostini; Mathias Weymar; Matthew Betts; Matthias Prigge; Michael Kaess; Michael Roden; Michelle Thai; Nathaniel M Schuster; Nicola Montano; Niels Hansen; Nils B Kroemer; Peijing Rong; Rico Fischer; Robert H Howland; Roberta Sclocco; Roberta Sellaro; Ronald G Garcia; Sebastian Bauer; Sofiya Gancheva; Stavros Stavrakis; Stefan Kampusch; Susan A Deuchars; Sven Wehner; Sylvain Laborde; Taras Usichenko; Thomas Polak; Tino Zaehle; Uirassu Borges; Vanessa Teckentrup; Vera K Jandackova; Vitaly Napadow; Julian Koenig Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2021-03-23 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Rosa Cabanas-Valdés; Mª Dolores Toro-Coll; Sara Cruz-Sicilia; Laura García-Rueda; Pere Ramón Rodríguez-Rubio; Jordi Calvo-Sanz Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-06 Impact factor: 3.390