Ebrima Jatta1, Musa Jawara2, John Bradley3, David Jeffries2, Balla Kandeh1, Jakob B Knudsen4, Anne L Wilson5, Margaret Pinder6, Umberto D'Alessandro7, Steve W Lindsay8. 1. National Malaria Control Programme, Banjul, The Gambia. 2. Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Banjul, The Gambia. 3. Tropical Epidemiology Group and Infectious Diseases Department, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. 4. The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation, Copenhagen, Denmark. 5. Department of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, UK. 6. Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Banjul, The Gambia; Department of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, UK. 7. Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Banjul, The Gambia; Tropical Epidemiology Group and Infectious Diseases Department, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. 8. Department of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, UK; Tropical Epidemiology Group and Infectious Diseases Department, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Electronic address: s.w.lindsay@durham.ac.uk.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Unprecedented improvements in housing are occurring across much of rural sub-Saharan Africa, but the consequences of these changes on malaria transmission remain poorly explored. We examined how different typologies of rural housing affect mosquito house entry and indoor climate. METHODS: Five typologies of mud-block houses were constructed in rural Gambia: four were traditional designs with poorly fitted doors and one was a novel design with gable windows to improve ventilation. In each house, one male volunteer slept under a bednet and mosquitoes were collected indoors with a light trap. Typologies were rotated between houses weekly. Indoor conditions were monitored with data loggers and the perceived comfort of sleepers recorded with questionnaires. We used pyschrometric modelling to quantify the comfort of the indoor climate using the logger data. Primary measurements were mean number of Anopheles gambiae and mean temperature for each house typology. FINDINGS: In thatched-roofed houses, closing the eaves reduced A gambiae house entry by 94% (95% CI 89-97) but increased the temperature compared with thatched-roofed houses with open eaves. In houses with closed eaves, those with metal roofs had more A gambiae, were hotter (1·5°C hotter [95% CI 1·3-1·7]) between 2100h and 2300 h, and had 25% higher concentrations of carbon dioxide (211·1 ppm higher [117·8-304·6]) than those with thatched roofs. In metal-roofed houses with closed eaves, mosquito house entry was reduced by 96% (91-98) by well fitted screened doors. Improved ventilation of metal-roofed houses made them as cool as thatched houses with open eaves. Metal-roofed houses with closed eaves were considered more uncomfortable than thatched ones with closed eaves. In metal-roofed houses, ventilated houses were more comfortable than unventilated houses before midnight, when people retired to bed. INTERPRETATION: Closing the eaves reduced vector entry in thatched houses but increased entry in metal-roofed houses. Metal-roofed houses with closed eaves were, however, protected against malaria vectors by well fitted screened doors and were made comfortable by increasing ventilation. House designs that exclude mosquitoes and are comfortable to live in should be a priority in sub-Saharan Africa. FUNDING: Sir Halley Stewart Trust, Global Clinical Trials, and Global Challenges Research Fund.
INTRODUCTION: Unprecedented improvements in housing are occurring across much of rural sub-Saharan Africa, but the consequences of these changes on malaria transmission remain poorly explored. We examined how different typologies of rural housing affect mosquito house entry and indoor climate. METHODS: Five typologies of mud-block houses were constructed in rural Gambia: four were traditional designs with poorly fitted doors and one was a novel design with gable windows to improve ventilation. In each house, one male volunteer slept under a bednet and mosquitoes were collected indoors with a light trap. Typologies were rotated between houses weekly. Indoor conditions were monitored with data loggers and the perceived comfort of sleepers recorded with questionnaires. We used pyschrometric modelling to quantify the comfort of the indoor climate using the logger data. Primary measurements were mean number of Anopheles gambiae and mean temperature for each house typology. FINDINGS: In thatched-roofed houses, closing the eaves reduced A gambiae house entry by 94% (95% CI 89-97) but increased the temperature compared with thatched-roofed houses with open eaves. In houses with closed eaves, those with metal roofs had more A gambiae, were hotter (1·5°C hotter [95% CI 1·3-1·7]) between 2100h and 2300 h, and had 25% higher concentrations of carbon dioxide (211·1 ppm higher [117·8-304·6]) than those with thatched roofs. In metal-roofed houses with closed eaves, mosquito house entry was reduced by 96% (91-98) by well fitted screened doors. Improved ventilation of metal-roofed houses made them as cool as thatched houses with open eaves. Metal-roofed houses with closed eaves were considered more uncomfortable than thatched ones with closed eaves. In metal-roofed houses, ventilated houses were more comfortable than unventilated houses before midnight, when people retired to bed. INTERPRETATION: Closing the eaves reduced vector entry in thatched houses but increased entry in metal-roofed houses. Metal-roofed houses with closed eaves were, however, protected against malaria vectors by well fitted screened doors and were made comfortable by increasing ventilation. House designs that exclude mosquitoes and are comfortable to live in should be a priority in sub-Saharan Africa. FUNDING: Sir Halley Stewart Trust, Global Clinical Trials, and Global Challenges Research Fund.
Authors: Luigi Sedda; Robert S McCann; Alinune N Kabaghe; Steven Gowelo; Monicah M Mburu; Tinashe A Tizifa; Michael G Chipeta; Henk van den Berg; Willem Takken; Michèle van Vugt; Kamija S Phiri; Russell Cain; Julie-Anne A Tangena; Christopher M Jones Journal: PLoS Pathog Date: 2022-07-06 Impact factor: 7.464
Authors: Margaret Mendi Njoroge; Alexandra Hiscox; Adam Saddler; Willem Takken; Joop J A van Loon; Ulrike Fillinger Journal: Parasit Vectors Date: 2022-07-20 Impact factor: 4.047
Authors: Steven W Lindsay; Michael Davies; Graham Alabaster; Hector Altamirano; Ebrima Jatta; Musa Jawara; Majo Carrasco-Tenezaca; Lorenz von Seidlein; Fiona C Shenton; Lucy S Tusting; Anne L Wilson; Jakob Knudsen Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2020-12-28 Impact factor: 6.237
Authors: Majo Carrasco-Tenezaca; Musa Jawara; Mahamed Y Abdi; John Bradley; Otis Sloan Brittain; Sainey Ceesay; Umberto D'Alessandro; David Jeffries; Margaret Pinder; Hannah Wood; Jakob B Knudsen; Steve W Lindsay Journal: J R Soc Interface Date: 2021-05-26 Impact factor: 4.118
Authors: Ebrima Jatta; Majo Carrasco-Tenezaca; Musa Jawara; John Bradley; Sainey Ceesay; Umberto D'Alessandro; David Jeffries; Balla Kandeh; Daniel Sang-Hoon Lee; Margaret Pinder; Anne L Wilson; Jakob Knudsen; Steve W Lindsay Journal: J R Soc Interface Date: 2021-05-12 Impact factor: 4.118
Authors: Jakob B Knudsen; Margaret Pinder; Ebrima Jatta; Musa Jawara; Mahamed A Yousuf; Amalie T Søndergaard; Steve W Lindsay Journal: Malar J Date: 2020-07-31 Impact factor: 2.979