Literature DB >> 30394784

Perception of the Delboeuf illusion by the adult domestic cat (Felis silvestris catus) in comparison with other mammals.

Péter Szenczi1, Zyanya I Velázquez-López1, Andrea Urrutia1, Robyn Hudson1, Oxána Bánszegi1.   

Abstract

The comparative study of the perception of visual illusions between different species is increasingly recognized as a useful noninvasive tool to better understand visual perception and its underlying mechanisms and evolution. The aim of the present study was to test whether the domestic cat is susceptible to the Delboeuf illusion in a manner similar to other mammalian species studied to date. For comparative reasons, we followed the methods used to test other mammals in which the animals were tested in a 2-way choice task between same-size food stimuli presented on different-size plates. In 2 different control conditions, overall the 18 cats tested spontaneously chose more often the larger amount of food, although at the individual level, they showed interindividual differences. In the Delboeuf illusion condition, where 2 equal amounts of food were presented on different-size plates, all cats chose the food presented on the smaller plate more often than on the larger one, suggesting that they were susceptible to the illusion at the group level, although at the individual level none of them performed significantly above chance. As we found no correlation between the cats' overall performance in the control conditions and their performance in the illusion condition, we propose that the mechanisms underlying spontaneous size discrimination and illusion perception might be different. In the discussion, we compare the results of the present study with the results for other previously tested mammals and highlight some possible reasons for their similarities and differences. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30394784     DOI: 10.1037/com0000152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  4 in total

1.  Children and monkeys overestimate the size of high-contrast stimuli.

Authors:  Audrey E Parrish; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Guppies (Poecilia reticulata) are deceived by visual illusions during obstacle negotiation.

Authors:  Maria Santacà; Angelo Bisazza; Christian Agrillo
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  From Receptive to Perceptive Fields: Size-Dependent Asymmetries in Both Negative Afterimages and Subcortical On and Off Post-Stimulus Responses.

Authors:  Xu Liu; Hui Li; Ye Wang; Tianhao Lei; Jijun Wang; Lothar Spillmann; Ian Max Andolina; Wei Wang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  The Challenge of Illusory Perception of Animals: The Impact of Methodological Variability in Cross-Species Investigation.

Authors:  Maria Santacà; Christian Agrillo; Maria Elena Miletto Petrazzini
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-30       Impact factor: 2.752

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.