Literature DB >> 30394555

Reliability of prenatal detection of X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia by tooth germ sonography.

Johanna Hammersen1, Sigrun Wohlfart1, Tamme W Goecke2, Angela Köninger3, Holger Stepan4, Ralph Gallinat5, Susan Morris6, Katharina Bücher7, Angus Clarke6,8, Stephanie Wünsche1, Matthias W Beckmann1, Holm Schneider1, Florian Faschingbauer1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (XLHED), dysfunction of ectodysplasin A1 (EDA1) due to EDA mutations results in malformation of hair, teeth, and sweat glands. Hypohidrosis, which can cause life-threatening hyperthermia, is amenable to intrauterine therapy with recombinant EDA1. This study aimed at evaluating tooth germ sonography as a noninvasive means to identify affected fetuses in pregnant carrier women.
METHODS: Sonography, performed at 10 study sites between gestational weeks 18 and 28, led to the diagnosis of XLHED if fewer than six tooth germs were detected in mandible or maxilla. The assessment was verified postnatally by EDA sequencing and/or clinical findings. Estimated fetal weights and postnatal weight gain of boys with XLHED were assessed using appropriate growth charts.
RESULTS: In 19 of 38 sonographic examinations (23 male and 13 female fetuses), XLHED was detected prenatally. The prenatal diagnosis proved to be correct in 37 cases; one affected male fetus was missed. Specificity and positive predictive value were both 100%. Tooth counts obtained by clinical examination corresponded well with findings on panoramic radiographs. We observed no weight deficits of subjects with XLHED in utero but occasionally during infancy.
CONCLUSION: Tooth germ sonography is highly specific and reliable in detecting XLHED prenatally.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30394555     DOI: 10.1002/pd.5384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  6 in total

1.  Safety and immunogenicity of Fc-EDA, a recombinant ectodysplasin A1 replacement protein, in human subjects.

Authors:  Iris Körber; Ophir D Klein; Patrick Morhart; Florian Faschingbauer; Dorothy K Grange; Angus Clarke; Christine Bodemer; Silvia Maitz; Kenneth Huttner; Neil Kirby; Caroline Durand; Holm Schneider
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Prenatal ultrasound findings of ectodermal dysplasia: a case report.

Authors:  Liang Li; Yi Zhou; Ruixia Tian; Chaoxue Zhang
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 3.  Ectodysplasin A (EDA) Signaling: From Skin Appendage to Multiple Diseases.

Authors:  Ruihan Yang; Yilan Mei; Yuhan Jiang; Huiling Li; Ruixi Zhao; Jian Sima; Yuyuan Yao
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 6.208

4.  Ectodermal dysplasias: New perspectives on the treatment of so far immedicable genetic disorders.

Authors:  Holm Schneider
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  First report of X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia with a hemizygous c.1142G > C in the EDA gene: variant of uncertain significance or new pathogenic variant?

Authors:  Mario Tumminello; Antonella Gangemi; Federico Matina; Melania Guardino; Bianca Lea Giuffrè; Giovanni Corsello
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.638

6.  Two novel ectodysplasin A gene mutations and prenatal diagnosis of X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia.

Authors:  Kang Yu; Yihan Shen; Cai-Ling Jiang; Wei Huang; Feng Wang; Yi-Qun Wu
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 2.183

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.