Literature DB >> 30394261

Human toxoplasmosis: a systematic review for genetic diversity of Toxoplasma gondii in clinical samples.

S A Hosseini1, A Amouei1, M Sharif1, Sh Sarvi1, L Galal2, J Javidnia3, A S Pagheh1, S Gholami4, A Mizani1, A Daryani1.   

Abstract

Toxoplasma gondii (T. gondii) as an obligate intracellular protozoan with a worldwide distribution can infect virtually all warm-blooded animals and humans. This study aims to provide a summary of the available data on genotypes of T. gondii in human. Five databases including MEDLINE in PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, Web of Science and Google Scholar were searched for the T. gondii genotyping in human during 1995-August 2017. Next, we screened all the articles based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Overall, 26 studies were eligible regarding genotyping T. gondii in human samples. In clonal genotyping, 167 out of 286 cases (58%) were infected with type II. Genetic characterisation of T. gondii isolates displayed that type II was the most predominant genotype in human with the prevalence of 64.3%, 62.1% and 41.7% in patients with AIDS, congenital and ocular toxoplasmosis, respectively. In ToxoDB genotyping, most individuals were infected with genotypes #9 and #65 (21.2%). Based on these results, genotype profile of T. gondii isolates is different throughout the world. The strains in Asian and African countries are characterised by low genetic diversity, while in North and South America a wide diversity of this parasite is found. In countries without any data (e.g. Australia, Western and Southern Africa and Western Asia), identification of T. gondii genotypes might discover higher genetic diversity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AIDS; Toxoplasma gondii; congenital; genotype; ocular

Year:  2018        PMID: 30394261      PMCID: PMC6518561          DOI: 10.1017/S0950268818002947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiol Infect        ISSN: 0950-2688            Impact factor:   2.451


Introduction

Toxoplasma gondii as an obligate intracellular protozoan with a worldwide distribution can infect virtually all warm-blooded animals and human. One-third of the human population is assumed to be infected with T. gondii [1]. In immunocompetent individuals, clinical symptoms of toxoplasmosis present as mild and self-limiting, including fever, malaise and lymphadenopathy. However, infection is usually more severe in immunocompromised people and pregnant women. In these groups, the infection is accompanied by more complications, such as encephalitis, retinochoroiditis, foetus abortion, splenomegaly and pneumonitis [2]. The number and genetic diversity of parasites play an important role in pathogenesis of T. gondii [3]. Identifying the genotypes of T. gondii using molecular technologies is invaluable in epidemiological studies. These techniques include multilocus polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP), microsatellite analysis, random amplified polymorphic (RAPD), multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and high-resolution melting (HRM) analysis [4]. The first genotyping studies on T. gondii strains in France and the United States of America demonstrated a clonal population structure with three main lineages namely type I, II and III [5]. Despite the sexual phase and global distribution of T. gondii, the population structure of this parasite is explained as highly clonal with low genetic diversity [6]. This was found in genetic researches on isolates from Europe and USA which classified the isolates as three major genotypes of type I, II and III (approximately 90%) [7]. More genetic variation of T. gondii, except for the three main lineages, was found in the other continents. These ‘new’ genotypes were designated as atypical, exotic, recombinant or non-archetypal genotypes [8, 9]. Multilocus PCR-RFLP analysis of 10 gene markers in 1457 T. gondii isolates worldwide revealed 189 different genotypes. The data of these genotypes are displayed in ToxoDB [10]. Numerous studies were performed on T. gondii genotyping in different groups of patients and healthy individuals. However, there is no exhaustive documented data regarding this subject. Therefore, this study aims to provide a summary of the available data on genotypes of T. gondii in human. This study was carried out to evaluate the predominant genotypes in different continents of the world. Moreover, the prevalence of genotypes is assessed in various groups of human toxoplasmosis, namely immunocompromised, congenital, ocular toxoplasmosis, cancer and immunocompetent.

Methods

This review followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews (PRISMA) guidelines [11].

Literature search, study selection and data extraction

We searched MEDLINE in PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, Web of Science and Google Scholar during 1995–August 2017. The utilised keywords entailed Toxoplasma gondii, toxoplasmosis, genotype, genotyping, molecular characterisation, human, individuals, patients, pregnancy, women, congenital, cancer, AIDS, HIV, immunocompromised and ocular toxoplasmosis. We searched the mentioned keywords alone and in combination with the others. In this systematic review, the exclusion criteria encompassed not describing the T. gondii genotypes in human, in addition to using genetic characterisation methods with less than five gene markers. To collect precise information, a comprehensive search was completed on all published and unpublished articles including full texts, abstracts and parasitology congresses summaries. All the data were collected from English language articles. We defined a protocol for data extraction and two authors assessed the obtained data independently. Afterwards the disagreements between the comments were discussed and resolved. The data extracted from studies encompassed year, first author, country and continent, total sample size, methods, genotypes of T. gondii, type of patients and molecular markers used for genotyping in the study. The genotypes were classified as classical types I, II, III, mix/recombinant (i.e. I&III, I&II, II&III/exotic and unknown) atypical, Africa I and ToxoDB genotype. A protocol of this systematic review with CRD 42017070501 code is available in international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO, http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero) [12].

Results

A graphic summary of this study on genetic diversity of T. gondii is shown in Figure 1. Overall, we selected 4731 studies for this systematic review. After screening, 26 papers were eligible as genotyping studies on T. gondii in human samples (Table 1 and Fig. 2). From these papers, we collected 371 individual genotyping data, 286 of which being about clonal genotyping (I, II, III, mix/recombinant, Africa I and atypical) and 85 about ToxoDB genotyping (genotypes #1–#231).
Fig. 1.

Graphic summary of the study on genetic diversity of T. gondii in human.

Table 1.

Overview of the included studies regarding genotyping T. gondii isolates from human and summary of the main findings

No.AuthorPatients groupMethods for genotypingMolecular markers for genotypingNo. of isolatesNo. (%) genotype
1Howe and Sibley [13]AIDS/congenital toxoplasmosisPCR-RFLPSAG1, SAG2, L328, ROP1, 850, 626816 (23.5) I, 43 (63.2) II, 9 (13.3) III
2Grigg et al. [9]Ocular toxoplasmosisPCR-RFLPB1, SAG1, SAG2, SAG3, SAG4123 (25) I, 3 (25) II, 1 (8.4) III, 5 (41.6) I&III
3Ajzenberg et al. [14]Congenital toxoplasmosisPCR of MS markersTUB2, W35, TG-MA, w35487, N60608, N82375, N83021, N61191, AA5191508673 (84.8) II, 7 (8.1) I, 2 (2.3) III, 4 (4.6) atypical
4De melo Ferreira [15]Congenital toxoplasmosisPCR-RFLPSAG1, SAG2, SAG3, B1, cB21-4, cS10-A6, GRA6, L36344 (100) atypical
5Khan et al. [16]Ocular toxoplasmosisPCR-RFLP5′SAG2, 3′SAG2, BTUB, GRA6, SAG3113 (27.3) I, 2 (18.1) II, 3 (27.3) III, 3 (27.3) I&III
6Nowakowske et al. [17]NewbornsPCR-RFLP3′SAG2, 5′SAG2, SAG3, BTUB, GRA699 (100) III
7Djurković-Djaković et al. [18]Congenital toxoplasmosisPCR-RFLP5′SAG2, 3′SAG2, BTUB, SAG3, GRA611 (100) II
8Genot et al. [19]AIDSPCR of MS markersTUB2, TgM-A, W35, B17, B1811 (100) I&III
9Demar et al. [20]Congenital immunocompetentPCR of MS markersTUB2, W35, TgM-A, B18, B171111 (100) atypical
10Zhou et al. [21]NDMn-PCR-RFLPSAG1, SAG2, SAG3, BTUB, GRA6, c22-8, c29-2, L358, PK1, Apico31 (33.3) #1, 1 (33.3) #3, 1 (33.3) #4
11Boughattes et al. [22]Congenital toxoplasmosisPCR-RFLP3′SAG2, 5′SAG2, SAG3, BTUB, GRA6, APICO141 (7.14) I, 7 (50) I&III, 3 (21.4) I&II, 3 (21.4) I&II + I&III
12Ferreira et al. [23]AIDS, congenital, pregnant, ocular, acute toxoplasmosisMn-PCR-RFLPSAG1, SAG2, SAG3, BTUB, GRA6, C22-2, C29-2, L358, PK1, APICO2018 (90) #65, 1 (5) #71, 1 (5) #6
13Boughattes et al. [24]Congenital toxoplasmosisPCR-RFLP3′SAG2, 5′SAG2, SAG3, AK69, APICO, UPRT111 (100) I&III
14Boughattes et al. [25]Pregnant and diabeticPCR-RFLP3′SAG2, 5′SAG2, SAG2, SAG3, GRA6, BTUB, APICO, PK1, KT850, UPRT111 (100) atypical
15Fekkar et al. [26]Ocular toxoplasmosisPCR of MS markersTUB2, W35, TG-MA, B18, B171310 (76.9) II, 1 (7.7) II&III, 2 (15.4) Africa I
16Carneiro et al. [27]NewbornsMn-PCR-RFLP3′SAG2, 5′SAG2, SAG1, SAG3, SAG2, GRA6, L356, APICO, C29-2, C22-9, PK1257 (28) #11, 1 (4) #8, 3 (12) #206, 2 (8) #41, 2 (8) #108, 1 (4) #67, 1 (4) #207, 1 (4) #162, 1 (4) #208, 1 (4) #36, 1 (4) #209, 1 (4) #210, 1 (4) #211, 1 (4) #212, 1 (4) (mix/recombinant)
18Wang et al. [28]AIDS/cancerMn-PCR-RFLPSAG1, SAG2, SAG3, BTUB, GRA6, C22-2, C29-2, L358, PK1, APICO41 (25) #1, 1 (25) #9, 1 (25) #10, 1 (25) #204
19Costache et al. [29]Congenital toxoplasmosisPCR of MS markersTUB2, W35, TG-MA, w35487, N60608, N82375, N83021, N61191, AA51915011 (100) II
20Döşkaya et al. [30]Congenital toxoplasmosisPCR of MS markersTUB-2, W35, TgM-A, B18, B17, M33, IV.1, XI.1, M48, M102, N60, N82, AA, N61, N8322 (100) Africa I
21Pardini et al. [31]Congenital toxoplasmosisPCR-RFLPSAG2, SAG3, BTUB, GRA6, c29-2, c22-8, L358, PK1, Apico11 (100) III
22Higa et al. [32]Congenital toxoplasmosisMn-PCR-RFLPSAG1, SAG2, SAG3, BTUB, GRA6, C22-2, C29-2, L358, PK1, APICO33 (100) #166
23Silva et al. [33]Congenital toxoplasmosisMn-PCR-RFLPSAG1, 5′SAG2, 3′SAG2, SAG2 alt, SAG3, BTUB, GRA6, c22-8, c29-2, L358, PK1, Apico42 (50) #108, 1 (25) # 206, 1 (25) # 229
24Yeraa et al. [34]Congenital toxoplasmosisPCR of MS markersTUB2, W35, TgM-A, B18, B17, M33, IV.1, XI.1, M48, M102, N60, N82, AA, N61, N8322 (100) atypical
25Wang et al. [35]CancerMn- PCR-RFLPSAG1, SAG2, SAG3, BTUB, GRA6, C22-2, C29-2, L358, PK1, APICO99 (100) #9
26Cong et al. [36]CancerMn-PCR-RFLPSAG1, SAG2, SAG3, BTUB, GRA6, C22-2, C29-2, L358, PK1, APICO178 (47.1) #10, 8 (47.1) #9, 1 (5.8) (type I variant)
27Virales et al. [37]Congenital toxoplasmosisPCR-RFLP/PCR of MS markersSAG2, TUB, TgM, W35, B17, B18486 (12.5) I, 32 (66.6) II, 6 (12.5) I&II, 4 (8.3) I&III

MS, microsatellite Marker; ND, not determined; Mn, multi locus nested-PCR-RFLP (10 markers).

Fig. 2.

PRISMA flow diagram describing the study design.

Graphic summary of the study on genetic diversity of T. gondii in human. PRISMA flow diagram describing the study design. Overview of the included studies regarding genotyping T. gondii isolates from human and summary of the main findings MS, microsatellite Marker; ND, not determined; Mn, multi locus nested-PCR-RFLP (10 markers). Out of 286 cases, in clonal genotyping using PCR-RFLP based on multilocus typing (i.e. more than five gene markers) and microsatellite markers, 166 (58%), 36 (12.6%), 34 (11.9%), 24 (8.4%), 22 (7.7%) and 4 (1.4%) were infected with types II, I, mix/recombinant, III, atypical and Africa I type, respectively (Table 2). The global prevalence rate of T. gondii clonal genotypes in different continents is indicated in Figure 3. The most prevalent types were I and III reported from America (19/97, 19.6% and 12/97, 12.4%, respectively) and type II from Europe (120/173, 69.4%) (Table 3).
Table 2.

Clonal genotyping of T. gondii based on multilocus PCR-RFLP and microsatellite in different groups

GroupAuthorCountryNo. of isolatesType I No. (%)Type II No. (%)Type III No. (%)Mix/recombinant, Africa I and atypical No. (%)
CongenitalHowe and Sibley [13]USA4110 (24.4)25 (61)6 (14.6)
Ajzenberg et al. [14]France867 (8.1)73 (84.9)2 (2.3)4 (4.6) atypical
Ferreira et al. [23]Brazil44 (100) atypical
Nowakowske et al. [17]Poland99 (100)
Djurković-Djaković et al. [18]Serbia11 (100)
Demar et al. [20]French Guiana33 (100) atypical
Boughattes et al. [22]Tunisia141 (7.1)13 (50) mix/recombinant
Boughattes et al. [24]Tunisia11 (100) mix/recombinant
Boughattes et al. [24]Tunisia11 (100) atypical
Costache et al. [29]Romania11 (100)
Pardini et al. [31]Argentina11 (100)
Döşkaya et al. [30]Turkey22 (100) Africa I
Yera et al. [34]French Polynesia22 (100) atypical
Vilares et al. [37]Portugal486 (12.5)32 (66.7)10 (20.8) mix/recombinant
Total21424 (11.2)133 (62.1)17 (7.9)24 (11.2) mix/recombinant, 14 (6.5) atypical, 2 (0.9) Africa I
AIDSHowe and Sibley [13]USA276 (20)18 (70)3 (10)
Genot et al. [19]France11 (100) mix/recombinant
Total286 (21.4)18 (64.3)3 (10.7)1 (3.6) mix/recombinant
OcularGrigg et al. [9]France123 (25)3 (25)1 (8.4)5 (41.7) mix/recombinant
Khan et al. [16]Brazil113 (27.2)2 (18.2)3 (27.2)3 (27.2) mix/recombinant
Fekkar et al. [26]France1310 (77)1 (7.7) mix/recombinant, 2 (15.4) Africa I
Total366 (16.7)15 (41.7)4 (11.1)9 (22.2) mix/recombinant, 2 (5.6) Africa I
ImmunocompetentDemar et al. [20]French Guiana88 (100) atypical
Total28636 (12.6)166 (58)24 (8.4%)34 (11.9) mix/recombinant, 22 (7.7) atypical, 4 (1.4) Africa I
Fig. 3.

Geographical distribution of T. gondii strains in the world; sizes of pie charts correlate with the total number of isolates for each country; colours indicate different genotypes.

Table 3.

Global prevalence rate of clonal genotypes of T. gondii based on microsatellite and multilocus PCR-RFLP by continent

ContinentNo. of isolatesType I No. (%)Type II No. (%)Type III No. (%)Mix/recombinant No. (%)Atypical No. (%)Africa I No. (%)
America9719 (19.6)46 (47.4)12 (12.4)3 (3.1)17 (17.5)
Africa161 (6.3)14 (87.5)1 (6.3)
Europe17316 (9.2)120 (69.4)12 (6.9)17 (9.8)4 (2.3)4 (2.3)
Total28636 (12.6)166 (58)24 (8.4)34 (11.9)22 (7.7)4 (1.4)
Geographical distribution of T. gondii strains in the world; sizes of pie charts correlate with the total number of isolates for each country; colours indicate different genotypes. Clonal genotyping of T. gondii based on multilocus PCR-RFLP and microsatellite in different groups Global prevalence rate of clonal genotypes of T. gondii based on microsatellite and multilocus PCR-RFLP by continent In ToxoDB genotyping using PCR-RFLP based on multilocus typing, most individuals were infected with genotypes #9 and #65 (21.2%). It should be noted that genotype #65 was isolated from America, and genotype #9 from Asia (Table 4 and Fig. 3).
Table 4.

Genetic characterisation of T. gondii based on multilocus PCR-RFLP (ToxoDB) in different groups

GroupAuthorCountryType of sampleNo. of isolatesNo. (%) ToxoDB genotype
AIDSFerreira et al. [23]BrazilCSF97 (#65), 1(#71), 1 (#6)
Wang et al. [28]ChinaBlood21 (#9), 1 (#10)
Total117 (63.6) #65, 1 (9.1) #71, 1 (9.1) #6, 1 (9.1) #9, 1 (9.1) #10
CongenitalFerreira et al. [23]BrazilAmniotic fluid11 (100) #65
Ferreira et al. [23]BrazilBlood11 (100) #65
Carneiro et al. [27]BrazilBlood257 (28) #11, 1 (4) #8, 3 (12) #206, 2 (8) #41, 2 (8) #108, 1 (4) #67, 1 (4) #207, 1 (4) #162, 1 (4) #208, 1 (4) #36, 1 (4) #209, 1 (4) #210, 1 (4) #211, 1 (4) #212, 1 mix/recombinant
Silva et al. [33]BrazilBlood42 (50) #108, 1 (25) # 206, 1 (25) #229
Higa et al. [32]BrazilBlood33 (100) #166
Total347 (20.5) #11, 4 (11.7) #108, 4 (11.7) #206, 3 (8.8) #166, 2 (5.8) #65, 2 (5.8) #41, 1 (2.9) # 229, 1 (2.9) #8, 1 (2.9) #67, 1 (2.9) #207, 1 (2.9) #162, 1 (2.9) #208, 1 (2.9) #36, 1 (2.9) #209, 1 (2.9) #210 1 (2.9) #211, 1 (2.9) #212, 1 (2.9) mix/recombinant
OcularFerreira et al. [23]BrazilBlood77 (100) #65
CancerWang et al. [28]ChinaBlood21 (50) #204, 1 (50) #1
Cong et al. [36]ChinaBlood178 (47.1) #9, 8 (47.1) #10, 1 (5.8) type I variant
Wang et al. [35]ChinaBlood99 (100) #9
Total2817 (60.7) #9, 8 (28.5) #10, 1 (3.7) #204, 1 (3.7) #1, 1 (3.7) type I variant
UnknownZhou et al. [21]ChinaND31 (33.3) #1, 1 (33.3) #3, 1 (33.3) #4
Acute toxoplasmosisFerreira et al. [23]BrazilBlood/CSF22 (100) #65
Total8518 (21.1) # 9, 18 (21.1) #65, 9 (10.5) #10, 7 (8.2) #11, 4 (4.7) #206, 4 (4.7) #108, 3 (3.5) #166, 2 (2.3) #41, 3 (2.3) #1, 2 (2.3) #204, 1 (1.1) #8, 1 (1.1) #71, 1 (1.1) #6, 1 (1.1) #67, 1 (1.1) #20, 1 (1.1) #162, 1 (1.1) #208, 1 (1.1) #36, 1 (1.1) #209, 1 (1.1) #210, 1 (1.1) #211, 1 (1.1) #212, 1 (1.1) #229, 1 (1.1) #3, 1 (1.1) #4, 1 (1.1) type I variant

ND, not determined.

Genetic characterisation of T. gondii based on multilocus PCR-RFLP (ToxoDB) in different groups ND, not determined. In addition, the genotyping data of T. gondii were divided into several groups, including AIDS, congenital, ocular, acute toxoplasmosis, cancer and immunocompetent. Genetic characterisation of T. gondii isolates by PCR-RFLP based on multilocus and microsatellite markers (more than five gene markers) revealed that type II was the most predominant genotype among all groups of human toxoplasmosis (64.3%, 62.1% and 41.7% in AIDS patients, congenital form and ocular toxoplasmosis, respectively). On the other hand, the atypical type (100%) was the most common genotype in the immunocompetent group (Table 2). Furthermore, our analysis showed that ToxoDB genotype #65 was the most prevalent in ocular (100%) and AIDS (63.6%) groups. In addition, genotypes #11 and #9 were more prevalent in the congenital (20.5%) and other groups (54.5%) (Table 3). Genetic diversity of T. gondii isolates in different groups of human and patients is demonstrated in Table 5.
Table 5.

Genetic diversity of T. gondii isolates in different groups of patients

CategoryGroups of patientsToxoDB genotypes
All genotypesOcular#65
AIDS#6, #9, #10, #65, #71
Congenital#8, #11, #36, #41, #65, #67, #108, #162, #166, # 206, #207, #208, #209, #210, #211, #212, #229
Cancer#9, #10, #204, #1, type I variant
Common genotype ToxoDBAll groups#65
Ocular and AIDS#65
Ocular and congenital#65
AIDS and congenital#65
AIDS and cancer#9
Specific genotypesOcular
AIDS#6, #71
Congenital#8, #11, #36, #41, #67, #108, #162, #166, #206, #207, #208, #209, #210, #211, #212, #229
Cancer
Genetic diversity of T. gondii isolates in different groups of patients

Discussion

This systematic review is beneficial for understanding the epidemiology of T. gondii genotypes in high-risk groups of human. The present study determined the global prevalence rate of T. gondii genotypes in AIDS, congenital, ocular toxoplasmosis and other groups of patients, as well as healthy individuals. We used the documented data from the literature collected from different countries. After searching all the databases, 26 articles were included in this study. According to the results, type II was the most predominant genotype in human toxoplasmosis during 1995–August 2017. Type I lineages are uniformly lethal with absolute lethal dose (LD100) of 1 in mice. On the other hand, the type II and III lineages are significantly less virulent with LD100⩾103. Moreover, type I or type I-like atypical isolates are more likely to cause intensive retinochoroiditis in patients and the atypical isolates often result in severe acute or disseminated toxoplasmosis in immunocompromised patients [5, 13]. Various analyses indicate that the prevalence of T. gondii genotypes varies in different continents. In current study, the highest and lowest prevalence of T. gondii type I strain were reported from American (19.6%) and African continents (6.3%). As mentioned, type I strains of T. gondii with LD100 of almost one can cause lethal infections in all species of laboratory mice even at low dose inoculations. Therefore, practicing the basic measures seems to be necessary for controlling the disease, especially in the American continent. According to the literature, type II strains of T. gondii are the predominant among human samples in America, and Europe (USA, France, Portugal, etc.). Type II strains of T. gondii are of low virulence and high cyst-forming [5, 14, 38, 39]. We found in our analysis that Europe has the highest prevalence of T. gondii genotype type II (69.4%). Similar to type II, type III strains of T. gondii are low virulence with LD100⩾103 [5]. In this review, the highest prevalence of type III strains of T. gondii was observed in America (12/97, 12.4%). On the other hand, the lowest prevalence was reported from the European continent (12/173, 6.9%). According to our study, in the AIDS/HIV group, genotyping of T. gondii was performed on 28 isolates using multilocus markers. Our analysis showed that type II strains (18/28, 64.3%) were the most common, followed by type I (6/28, 21.4%), type III (3/28, 10.7%) and mix/recombinant type (1/28, 3.6%). Toxoplasmosis in immunocompromised patients is often due to reactivation of tissue cysts usually leading to severe and life-threatening diseases, toxoplasmic encephalitis and death [40]. The predominance of type II in the patients may simply reflect the prevalence of type II infection in general population. In order to determine the genotypes in congenital toxoplasmosis group, 214 T. gondii isolates were examined. Totally, 133 (62.1%), 24 (11.2%), 24 (11.2%), 17 (7.9%), 14 (6.5%) and 2 (0.9%) isolates were classified as types II, I, mix/recombinant, III, atypical and Africa I, respectively. Congenital toxoplasmosis may result in intracerebral calcification, hydrocephalus, mental retardation and retinochoroiditis, which may be present at birth or develop later in life [41]. The role of genotypes in congenital toxoplasmosis is still controversial. However, it was shown in the study performed by Hutson et al. that congenital infections with type II strain are frequently associated with hydrocephalus characteristic patterns [42]. Rico-Torres et al. (2016) in a systematic review study demonstrated that neonatal cases infected with type II strain of T. gondii during the first half of pregnancy present severe clinical symptoms. The latter result suggests a crucial role for immature state and response of the foetus in susceptibility to disease [43]. Among the 26 papers included in this systematic review, only one study had determined the genotype of T. gondii in immunocompetent individuals and all the eight samples were infected with the atypical type. In the ocular toxoplasmosis group, 36 isolates were genotyped and the obtained results showed that type II strains were predominant (15/36, 41.7%), followed by mix/recombinant type (9/36, 25%), type I (6/36, 16.7%), type III (4/36, 11.1%) and Africa I type (2/36, 5.6%) in this group. The previous studies in different countries revealed that ocular toxoplasmosis is associated with type I strain of T. gondii. According to the studies conducted using less than five gene markers, type I strain has the ability for extracellular migration and decreases conversion to the bradyzoite form, in comparison with types II and III [44]. Our systematic review by more than five gene markers demonstrates that type II is the most prevalent in these patients. The reason for this difference can be attributed to application of more gene markers causing the genotyping to be more precise. In recent years, researchers have used different markers (about 10–12 markers) of multilocus PCR-RFLP and microsatellites for epidemiology and genotyping studies [44]. Findings of these studies have indicated a higher genetic diversity among the different groups of patients and healthy individuals. In ToxoDB, 1457 human and animal samples were registered that revealed different ToxoDB genotypes (#1–#231). At present, major genotypes such as Chinese 1 (#9), type Br I (#6), type Br II (#11), type Br III (#8), type IV (#17) and type 12 (#4, #5) were added to the previous list (type I, II, III lineages and atypical or exotic genotypes) [38, 45]. According to new nomenclature, identified genotypes are Type I (#10), Type II (#1 clonal, #3 variant) and Type III (#2), kinds of atypical or exotic genotypes, Chinese 1 (#9, #10), Type Br I (#6), Type Br II (#11), Type Br III (#8), Type IV (#17) and Type 12 (#4, #5). Out of the 26 studies included in the current review, 11 studies used multilocus gene markers for genotyping (ToxoDB) and determination of genetic diversity. Our analysis demonstrated that genotype #65 is predominant among all the different groups of human. Moreover, genotype #65 is the most prevalent genotype in AIDS and ocular toxoplasmosis groups. However, in the congenital toxoplasmosis group, genotype #11 was the most common. Genotypes #6 and #71 were observed only in the AIDS group. On the other hand, 16 different ToxoDB genotypes, including #8, #11, #36, #41, #67, #108, #162, #166, #206, #207, #207, #209, #210, #211, #212 and #229 were found in the congenital toxoplasmosis group. It seems that the cause of high-genetic diversity in congenital toxoplasmosis may be due to more sampling from the different regions of the world. This review indicated that genetic diversity of T. gondii was low in Asian and African countries, contrary to the ones in North and South America.

Conclusion

The current study showed that new techniques with more genetic markers for T. gondii genotyping, might lead to different results regarding genetic diversity. This is true especially in countries that do not have any data concerning genotyping of this parasite, such as Australia, Western and Southern Africa and Western Asia. Identification of the specific genotype in each area of the world could be valuable in developing new strategies for treatment, vaccination, diagnosis, control and prevention of T. gondii in human.
  12 in total

1.  Towards a rapid sequencing-based molecular surveillance and mosaicism investigation of Toxoplasma gondii.

Authors:  Anabela Vilares; Vítor Borges; Daniel Sampaio; Idalina Ferreira; Susana Martins; Luis Vieira; Maria João Gargaté; João Paulo Gomes
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  Toxoplasma gondii infection in slaughtered domestic ruminants in Northwest Ethiopia: occurrence, bioassay and virulence assessment.

Authors:  Moges Maru; Debasu Damtie; Ambaye Kenubih; Abiy Maru; Biyansa Adugna; Shimelis Dagnachew; Zewdu Seyoum Tarekegn
Journal:  J Parasit Dis       Date:  2022-01-22

3.  Oxadiazon Derivatives Elicit Potent Intracellular Growth Inhibition against Toxoplasma gondii by Disrupting Heme Biosynthesis.

Authors:  Kerrick C Rees; Zhicheng Dou; Daniel C Whitehead
Journal:  ACS Infect Dis       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 5.578

Review 4.  Catastrophic consequences: can the feline parasite Toxoplasma gondii prompt the purrfect neuroinflammatory storm following traumatic brain injury?

Authors:  Tamara L Baker; Mujun Sun; Bridgette D Semple; Shiraz Tyebji; Christopher J Tonkin; Richelle Mychasiuk; Sandy R Shultz
Journal:  J Neuroinflammation       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 8.322

Review 5.  Detection of human intestinal protozoan parasites in vegetables and fruits: a review.

Authors:  Junqiang Li; Zhenzhen Wang; Md Robiul Karim; Longxian Zhang
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 3.876

6.  Seroprevalence and risk factors of Toxoplasma gondii infection in primary school children in Henan province, central China.

Authors:  Shuai Wang; Zhijun Yao; Haoran Li; Pengju Li; Dong Wang; Haizhu Zhang; Qing Xie; Zhenchao Zhang; Xiangrui Li
Journal:  Parasite       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 3.000

7.  Development of High Resolution Melting Analysis as a Diagnostic Tool for Molecular Detection of Toxoplasma Infection in Pregnant Women and HIV Positive Cases.

Authors:  Ahmad Hosseini-Safa; Saeedeh Shojaee; Seyed Alireza Salami; Mehdi Mohebali; Sedigheh Hantoushzadeh; Parisa Mousavi; Seyed Ali Dehghan Manshadi; Hossein Keshavarz Valian
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.429

8.  CD209 C-Type Lectins Promote Host Invasion, Dissemination, and Infection of Toxoplasma gondii.

Authors:  Olivia Adhiambo Njiri; Xiaoyan Zhang; Yingmiao Zhang; Bicong Wu; Lingyu Jiang; Qiao Li; Wenqi Liu; Tie Chen
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 9.  Human toxoplasmosis in Mozambique: gaps in knowledge and research opportunities.

Authors:  Leonardo Manuel; Gabriela Santos-Gomes; Emilia V Noormahomed
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 3.876

10.  Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii among healthy blood donors in two locations in Tunisia and associated risk factors.

Authors:  Arwa Lachkhem; Ibtissem Lahmar; Lokman Galal; Oussama Babba; Habib Mezhoud; Mohssen Hassine; Ahmed Lachkhem; Marie-Laure Dardé; Aurélien Mercier; Hamouda Babba
Journal:  Parasite       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 3.020

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.