Literature DB >> 30393885

Is it Possible to Implant HeartMate 3 Less Invasively? New Pump, New Approach.

Sinan Sabit Kocabeyoglu1, Umit Kervan1, Dogan Emre Sert1, Ertekin Utku Unal1, Burcu Demirkan2, Yesim Guray2, Emre Aygun1, Osman Fehmi Beyazal1, Mehmet Karahan1, Mustafa Pac1.   

Abstract

HeartMate 3 (HM3) left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is a compact, intrapericardial, centrifugal flow pump with a fully magnetically levitated rotor and a wide range of operation (2-10 L/min) to accommodate a broad range of clinical needs. We analyzed our experience with Heartware VAD (HVAD) and HM3 implantation through minimally invasive left thoracotomy (MILT) and upper minimal J sternotomy. Between March 2015 and October 2016, 31 patients who underwent LVAD implantation through MILT were included in this study. Twenty-three patients had HVAD (Group A) implantation, whereas 8 patients had HM3 (Group B). To compare outcomes of these pumps, measures were; mortality, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time, duration of mechanical ventilatory support, blood loss and transfusion, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, right ventricular failure (RVF) and requirement of support with temporary devices, stroke, pump thrombosis, gastrointestinal bleeding and driveline infection rates. Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support profiles, Pennsylvania and Michigan Risk Scores, right ventricular stroke work index and central venous pressure/pulmonary capillary wedge pressure ratio did not differ between these two groups. There was no difference in the length of ICU stay (P = 0.056), post-operative blood product administration (P = 0.701), total time on mechanical ventilation (P = 0.386), RVF (P = 1) or duration of CPB (P = 0.836). In-hospital cerebrovascular event rate was 13% in Group A and 0% in Group B, respectively. The HM3 assist system can be successfully implanted with minimally invasive techniques. This technique has proved to be safe and reproducible, with good clinical outcomes. Further, large collaborative studies are needed to identify the advantages of this approach.
© 2018 International Center for Artificial Organs and Transplantation and Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Left ventricular assist device; Mechanical circulatory support; Minimally invasive; Thoracotomy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30393885     DOI: 10.1111/aor.13289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Organs        ISSN: 0160-564X            Impact factor:   3.094


  6 in total

Review 1.  Non-patient factors associated with infections in LVAD recipients: A scoping review.

Authors:  Supriya Shore; Michael J Pienta; Tessa M F Watt; Gardner Yost; Whitney A Townsend; Lourdes Cabrera; Michael D Fetters; Carol Chenoweth; Keith D Aaronson; Francis D Pagani; Donald S Likosky
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 13.569

2.  Temporary ventricular assist device implantation by sternotomy-avoiding technique for bridge-to-decision therapy: a comparison with conventional implantation.

Authors:  Masatoshi Akiyama; Konosuke Sasaki; Satoshi Kawatsu; Yusuke Suzuki; Tomoyuki Suzuki; Ichiro Yoshioka; Goro Takahashi; Kiichiro Kumagai; Osamu Adachi; Yoshikatsu Saiki
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-08-01

3.  Sex differences in outcomes following less-invasive left ventricular assist device implantation.

Authors:  Silvia Mariani; Tong Li; Karl Bounader; Dietmar Boethig; Alexandra Schöde; Jasmin S Hanke; Jana Michaelis; L Christian Napp; Dominik Berliner; Guenes Dogan; Roberto Lorusso; Axel Haverich; Jan D Schmitto
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-03

Review 4.  Minimally invasive ventricular assist device implantation.

Authors:  Ameen Al-Naamani; Florian Fahr; Asim Khan; Christian Bireta; Michael Nozdrzykowski; Stefan Feder; Nikhil Deshmukh; Manal Jubeh; Sandra Eifert; Khalil Jawad; Uwe Schulz; Michael A Borger; Diyar Saeed
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  Bridge to transplantation from mechanical circulatory support: a narrative review.

Authors:  Alice L Zhou; Eric W Etchill; Katherine A Giuliano; Benjamin L Shou; Kavita Sharma; Chun W Choi; Ahmet Kilic
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 6.  Continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: Current knowledge, complications, and future directions.

Authors:  Javier Castrodeza; Carlos Ortiz-Bautista; Francisco Fernández-Avilés
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 2.737

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.