| Literature DB >> 30393726 |
Shuoshuo Li1,2, Pengpeng Cheng1,2, Jiaxian Luo1,2, Dan Zhou1,2, Weiming Xu1,2, Jingwei Li1,2, Ruchun Li1,2, Dingsheng Yuan1,2.
Abstract
A flexible asymmetric supercapacitor (ASC) based on a CoAl-layered double hydroxide (CoAl-LDH) electrode and a reduced graphene oxide (rGO) electrode was successfully fabricated. The CoAl-LDH electrode as a positive electrode was synthesized by directly growing CoAl-LDH nanosheet arrays on a carbon cloth (CC) through a facile hydrothermal method, and it delivered a specific capacitance of 616.9 F g-1 at a current density of 1 A g-1. The rGO electrode as a negative electrode was synthesized by coating rGO on the CC via a simple dip-coating method and revealed a specific capacitance of 110.0 F g-1 at a current density of 2 A g-1. Ultimately, the advanced ASC offered a broad voltage window (1.7 V) and exhibited a high superficial capacitance of 1.77 F cm-2 at 2 mA cm-2 and a high energy density of 0.71 mWh cm-2 at a power density of 17.05 mW cm-2, along with an excellent cycle stability (92.9% capacitance retention over 8000 charge-discharge cycles).Entities:
Keywords: Cycle stability; Flexible asymmetric supercapacitor; Layer double hydroxides; Reduced graphene oxide
Year: 2017 PMID: 30393726 PMCID: PMC6199024 DOI: 10.1007/s40820-017-0134-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomicro Lett ISSN: 2150-5551
Fig. 1a XRD pattern; b FTIR; c N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms and pore sizes distribution (inset); d EDX spectroscopy of CoAl-LDHs
Fig. 2a, b SEM images of CoAl-LDHs on CC electrode and c, d TEM images of CoAl-LDHs
Fig. 3Electrochemical performances of the CoAl-LDHs@CC electrode: a CVs at different scan rates; b GCD curves at different current densities; c Plot of C sp versus current density; d Cycling performances during 2000 cycles at a large current density of 10 A g−1
Fig. 4a XRD pattern of rGO@CC; b the SEM image of rGO@CC electrode; and (c, d) the TEM image of rGO
Fig. 5Electrochemical performances of the rGO@CC electrode: a CVs at different scan rates; b GCD curves at different current densities; c Plot of specific capacitance versus current density; d Cycling performance during 2000 cycles at a large current density of 10 A g−1
Fig. 6a Comparison of the CV curves of positive and negative electrodes; b CV curves of the ASC at different voltages; c CV curves of ASC device at different scan rates; d GCD curves of ASC device at different current densities
Fig. 7a The capacitance calculated from Fig. 6d; b CV curves (at 50 mV s−1) under different bending conditions; c Ragone plot of ASC device (inset: a red LED lighted by ASC device); d Cycle stability of the ASC device at a current density of 15 mA cm−2
The comparison of the capacitive performance of CoAl-LDHs//rGO ASC with others
| ASC | Areal capacitance (F cm−2) | Voltage (V) | Energy density (mWh cm−2) | Power density (mW cm−2) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RGO@MnO2//RGO | 0.34 | 1.5 | 0.0115 | 3.80 | [ |
| MnO2@PEDOT:PSS//AC | 1.67 | 2.0 | – | – | [ |
| NiO//rGO | 0.28 | 1.7 | – | – | [ |
| PPy@MnO2//AC | 1.41 | 1.8 | 0.63 | 0.90 | [ |
| NiCoO4@Ni3S2//AC | 2.25 | 1.8 | – | – | [ |
| CoAl-LDHs//rGO | 1.77 | 1.7 | 0.71 | 17.05 | This work |