| Literature DB >> 30393700 |
Sajid Sajid1, Ahmed Mourtada Elseman2, Jun Ji1, Shangyi Dou1, Dong Wei1, Hao Huang1, Peng Cui1, Wenkang Xi1, Lihua Chu1, Yingfeng Li1, Bing Jiang1, Meicheng Li3.
Abstract
Although perovskite solar cells with power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) more than 22% have been realized with expensive organic charge-transporting materials, their stability and high cost remain to be addressed. In this work, the perovskite configuration of MAPbX (MA = CH3NH3, X = I3, Br3, or I2Br) integrated with stable and low-cost Cu:NiO x hole-transporting material, ZnO electron-transporting material, and Al counter electrode was modeled as a planar PSC and studied theoretically. A solar cell simulation program (wxAMPS), which served as an update of the popular solar cell simulation tool (AMPS: Analysis of Microelectronic and Photonic Structures), was used. The study yielded a detailed understanding of the role of each component in the solar cell and its effect on the photovoltaic parameters as a whole. The bandgap of active materials and operating temperature of the modeled solar cell were shown to influence the solar cell performance in a significant way. Further, the simulation results reveal a strong dependence of photovoltaic parameters on the thickness and defect density of the light-absorbing layers. Under moderate simulation conditions, the MAPbBr3 and MAPbI2Br cells recorded the highest PCEs of 20.58 and 19.08%, respectively, while MAPbI3 cell gave a value of 16.14%.Entities:
Keywords: Copper-doped nickel oxide; Perovskite solar cells; Simulation; Zinc oxide
Year: 2018 PMID: 30393700 PMCID: PMC6199104 DOI: 10.1007/s40820-018-0205-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomicro Lett ISSN: 2150-5551
Fig. 1a Schematic crosssection of p–i–n perovskite solar cells. b Energy band diagram of the corresponding heterojunctions. c Charge generation, separation, and extraction processes. d Simulated J–V characteristic curves under AM1.5G illumination at 100 mW cm−2 irradiance
Basic material parameters used for the simulation, which were carefully chosen from experimental reports [14, 23, 31]
| Material |
|
| Affinity | References | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAPbI3 | 10 | 1.5 | 3.93 | 2.8 × 1018 | 3.9 × 1018 | 10 | 10 | 1 × 109 | 1 × 109 | [ |
| MAPbI2Br | 15 | 1.7 | 3.77 | 3 × 1018 | 4.0 × 1018 | 15 | 15 | 1 × 1010 | 1 × 1010 | [ |
| MAPbBr3 | 17 | 2.2 | 3.38 | 3.5 × 1018 | 4.0 × 1019 | 17 | 17 | 2.14 × 1017 | 2.14 × 1017 | [ |
| ZnO | 9 | 3.3 | 4.40 | 2.2 × 1018 | 1.8 × 1019 | 10 | 2.5 | 1 × 1018 | 0.0 | [ |
| Cu:NiO | 11 | 3.62 | 2.0 | 1.6 × 1018 | 2.9 × 1020 | 1.4 | 4.9 | 0.0 | 1.5 × 1018 | [ |
Fig. 2a Simulated values of carrier recombination and generation rates in MAPbX (MA = CH3NH3, X = I3, I2Br, or Br3) layers designed with Cu:NiO (HTM) and ZnO (ETM). b–d Simulated J–V characteristic curves for different defect densities in the absorber film
Fig. 3a Variation (simulated) of PCE obtained as a function of thickness of photoactive materials. b Variation (simulated) of PCE as a function of operating temperature. c, d Variation (simulated) of photovoltaic parameters as a function of bandgap energy in perovskite materials
Simulated photovoltaic characteristics of solar cells measured under standard AM1.5G illumination at 100 mW cm−2 irradiance
| Device | FF (%) | Defect density (cm−3) | Optimized thickness (μm) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 0.964 | 20.87 | 79 | 16.14 | 1 × 1018 | 0.4 |
| B | 1.098 | 22.99 | 79.45 | 19.08 | 1 × 1018 | 0.5 |
| C | 1.107 | 22.53 | 81.67 | 20.58 | 1 × 1018 | 0.5 |