Literature DB >> 30393627

Multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative to standardize reporting of lung cancer screening.

Laura Cubillos1,2, Alison T Brenner1,2, Katherine Birchard3, Louise M Henderson2,3, Paul L Molina3, Michael Pignone4, Shana Ratner5,6, M Patricia Rivera2,7, Laura Jones8, Daniel S Reuland1,2,5.   

Abstract

Structured reporting of lung cancer screening (LCS) results with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) is necessary for appropriate follow-up and management of lung nodules. We describe processes for standardizing the reporting and tracking of screen-detected lung nodules by increasing documentation of Lung-RADS categorization of lung nodules. Our multidisciplinary team developed a project charter and key driver diagram, revised the radiology reporting template, and provided monthly audit reports to thoracic radiologists. Quarterly from Q1-2015 to Q2-2016, we measured the proportion of screening LDCT reports that included a documented Lung-RADS category. In Q1- and Q2-2015, no LDCT scans contained a Lung-RADS assessment. By the end of Q1-2016, 94% of screening LDCTs contained a Lung-RADS assessment with a recommended follow-up action. We developed systematic processes for lung nodule categorization, documentation, and tracking using Lung-RADS that improved structured reporting at one academic medical center.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lung neoplasms; early detection of cancer; quality improvement (QI); radiologists

Year:  2018        PMID: 30393627      PMCID: PMC6193896          DOI: 10.21037/tlcr.2018.09.08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res        ISSN: 2218-6751


  5 in total

1.  National lung screening trial: variability in nodule detection rates in chest CT studies.

Authors:  Paul F Pinsky; David S Gierada; P Hrudaya Nath; Ella Kazerooni; Judith Amorosa
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  An official American Thoracic Society/American College of Chest Physicians policy statement: implementation of low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening programs in clinical practice.

Authors:  Renda Soylemez Wiener; Michael K Gould; Douglas A Arenberg; David H Au; Kathleen Fennig; Carla R Lamb; Peter J Mazzone; David E Midthun; Maryann Napoli; David E Ost; Charles A Powell; M Patricia Rivera; Christopher G Slatore; Nichole T Tanner; Anil Vachani; Juan P Wisnivesky; Sue H Yoon
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  Components necessary for high-quality lung cancer screening: American College of Chest Physicians and American Thoracic Society Policy Statement.

Authors:  Peter Mazzone; Charles A Powell; Douglas Arenberg; Peter Bach; Frank Detterbeck; Michael K Gould; Michael T Jaklitsch; James Jett; David Naidich; Anil Vachani; Renda Soylemez Wiener; Gerard Silvestri
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Improving the Implementation of Lung Cancer Screening Guidelines at an Academic Primary Care Practice.

Authors:  Alison T Brenner; Laura Cubillos; Katherine Birchard; Caleb Doyle-Burr; John Eick; Louise Henderson; Laura Jones; Michael Massaro; Bailey Minish; Paul Molina; Michael Pignone; Shana Ratner; Maria Patricia Rivera; Daniel S Reuland
Journal:  J Healthc Qual       Date:  2018 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 1.095

5.  Screening for lung cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors:  Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 25.391

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Changes in Physician Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs, and Practices regarding Lung Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Louise M Henderson; Thad S Benefield; S Caitlin Bearden; Daniel S Reuland; Alison T Brenner; Adam O Goldstein; Allison Throneburg; M Patricia Rivera
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2019-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.