Kathryn H Howell1, Idia B Thurston2, Laura E Schwartz3, Lacy E Jamison3, Amanda J Hasselle3. 1. Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Memphis, 356 Psychology Building, Memphis, TN 38152-3230. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Memphis, 310 Psychology Building, Memphis, TN 38152-3230. 3. Doctoral Candidate, Department of Psychology, University of Memphis, 202 Psychology Building, Memphis, TN 38152-3230.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Research on adversity is often skewed toward assessing problematic functioning; yet many women display resilience following traumatic experiences. Examining individual, relational, community, and cultural variables can provide new knowledge about protective factors associated with resilience in women exposed to intimate partner violence (IPV). Controlling for demographics and circumstances of the violence, this study evaluated predictors of resilience, including spirituality, social support, community cohesion, and ethnic identity. METHOD: The sample consisted of 112 women (Mage =32.12, SD=5.78) exposed to physical, psychological, and/or sexual intimate partner violence in the past 6 months. Approximately 70% of participants were Black. Hierarchical linear regression modeling was conducted to examine factors related to resilience. Model 1 included demographics (age, education, and socioeconomic status) and stressful life experiences. Model 2 added circumstances of the violence: IPV severity, IPV perpetration by participant, and number of violent partners. The third and final model added spirituality, social support, community cohesion, and ethnic identity. RESULTS: The final model was significant, F(11, 97)=6.63; p<.001, adj. R2 =36.5%; with greater social support (β=.24; p=.009), more spirituality (β=.28; p=.002), and fewer violent relationships (β= -.25; p=.003) predicting higher resilience among women exposed to IPV. CONCLUSION: While risk factors associated with IPV are well-researched, little is known about factors related to resilient functioning, especially among minority populations. Knowledge gained from this study can advance the field of violence research by its identification of potentially mutable variables related to resilience. Such research could be applied to developing strength-based interventions for at-risk populations of violence-exposed women.
OBJECTIVE: Research on adversity is often skewed toward assessing problematic functioning; yet many women display resilience following traumatic experiences. Examining individual, relational, community, and cultural variables can provide new knowledge about protective factors associated with resilience in women exposed to intimate partner violence (IPV). Controlling for demographics and circumstances of the violence, this study evaluated predictors of resilience, including spirituality, social support, community cohesion, and ethnic identity. METHOD: The sample consisted of 112 women (Mage =32.12, SD=5.78) exposed to physical, psychological, and/or sexual intimate partner violence in the past 6 months. Approximately 70% of participants were Black. Hierarchical linear regression modeling was conducted to examine factors related to resilience. Model 1 included demographics (age, education, and socioeconomic status) and stressful life experiences. Model 2 added circumstances of the violence: IPV severity, IPV perpetration by participant, and number of violent partners. The third and final model added spirituality, social support, community cohesion, and ethnic identity. RESULTS: The final model was significant, F(11, 97)=6.63; p<.001, adj. R2 =36.5%; with greater social support (β=.24; p=.009), more spirituality (β=.28; p=.002), and fewer violent relationships (β= -.25; p=.003) predicting higher resilience among women exposed to IPV. CONCLUSION: While risk factors associated with IPV are well-researched, little is known about factors related to resilient functioning, especially among minority populations. Knowledge gained from this study can advance the field of violence research by its identification of potentially mutable variables related to resilience. Such research could be applied to developing strength-based interventions for at-risk populations of violence-exposed women.
Entities:
Keywords:
Black/African American; IPV; domestic violence; social support; spirituality
Authors: Mary Ann Dutton; Bonnie L Green; Stacey I Kaltman; Darren M Roesch; Thomas A Zeffiro; Elizabeth D Krause Journal: J Interpers Violence Date: 2006-07
Authors: Helen Straus; Catherine Cerulli; Louise Anne McNutt; Karin V Rhodes; Kenneth R Conner; Robin S Kemball; Nadine J Kaslow; Debra Houry Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Fleetwood Loustalot; Sharon B Wyatt; Mario Sims; Christopher G Ellison; Herman A Taylor; Lynn Underwood Journal: J Relig Health Date: 2009-08-20
Authors: Michael A Rodriguez; MarySue V Heilemann; Eve Fielder; Alfonso Ang; Faustina Nevarez; Carol M Mangione Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2008 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Eduardo de Paula Lima; Alina Gomide Vasconcelos; William Berger; Christian Haag Kristensen; Elizabeth do Nascimento; Ivan Figueira; Mauro Vitor Mendlowicz Journal: Trends Psychiatry Psychother Date: 2016 Oct-Dec
Authors: Katie J Shillington; Kimberley T Jackson; Cara A Davidson; Julia Yates; Jennifer D Irwin; Brenna Kaschor; Tara Mantler Journal: SN Soc Sci Date: 2022-06-21
Authors: Laura A Voith; Hyunjune Lee; Katie N Russell; Amy E Korsch-Williams Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-08 Impact factor: 3.390