| Literature DB >> 30393363 |
Niya Ma1, Zhipeng Duan2, Hao Ma3, Liangbin Su4, Peng Liang5, Xiaoru Ning6, Boshu He7, Xin Zhang8,9.
Abstract
Developing a three-dimensional laminar flow in the entrance region of rectangular microchannels has been investigated in this paper. When the hydrodynamic development length is the same magnitude as the microchannel length, entrance effects have to be taken into account, especially in relatively short ducts. Simultaneously, there are a variety of non-continuum or rarefaction effects, such as velocity slip and temperature jump. The available data in the literature appearing on this issue is quite limited, the available study is the semi-theoretical approximate model to predict pressure drop of developing slip flow in rectangular microchannels with different aspect ratios. In this paper, we apply the lattice Boltzmann equation method (LBE) to investigate the developing slip flow through a rectangular microchannel. The effects of the Reynolds number (1 < Re < 1000), channel aspect ratio (0 < ε < 1), and Knudsen number (0.001 < Kn < 0.1) on the dimensionless hydrodynamic entrance length, and the apparent friction factor, and Reynolds number product, are examined in detail. The numerical solution of LBM can recover excellent agreement with the available data in the literature, which proves its accuracy in capturing fundamental fluid characteristics in the slip-flow regime.Entities:
Keywords: apparent friction factor and Reynolds number product; entrance region; hydrodynamic development length; lattice Boltzmann equation method (LBE); rectangular microchannels; slip flow
Year: 2018 PMID: 30393363 PMCID: PMC6187285 DOI: 10.3390/mi9020087
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Micromachines (Basel) ISSN: 2072-666X Impact factor: 2.891
Figure 1Schematic illustration of space discrete and velocity discrete in the D3Q15 model.
Figure 2Developing velocity profiles in the streamwise direction of the microchannel in the slip regime.
Figure 3Comparisons between semi-theoretical model and FVM with three different aspect ratios.
Figure 4Comparison of for the numerical data by Renksizbulut et al. [14] for ε = 0.5 in the continnum flow regime.
Figure 5Comparison of for the numerical data by Renksizbulut et al. [14] and Niazmand et al. [52] for ε = 1 in the slip flow regime.
Figure 6Comparison of at the aspect ratio of 0.5 ().
Figure 7Comparison of current data and correlations for entrance length from the literature.
Figure 8Variation of with Re for different aspect ratios.
Figure 9Variation of entrance length with channel aspect ratio ε at different Kn values.
Comparison of at different Knudsen numbers between the present results and Hettiarachchi et al. [67] for .
| Present Results | Data [ | Error (%) | Present Results | Data [ | Error (%) | Present Results | Data [ | Error (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.001 | 0.07825 | 0.07782 | 0.55 | 0.08892 | 0.08858 | 0.38 | 0.09073 | 0.09028 | 0.50 |
| 0.02 | 0.07835 | 0.07791 | 0.56 | 0.08980 | 0.08942 | 0.42 | 0.09530 | 0.09483 | 0.49 |
| 0.04 | 0.07844 | 0.07801 | 0.55 | 0.09027 | 0.08974 | 0.59 | 0.09899 | 0.09847 | 0.53 |
| 0.06 | 0.07874 | 0.07836 | 0.48 | 0.09054 | 0.09025 | 0.32 | 0.10258 | 0.10226 | 0.31 |
| 0.08 | 0.07925 | 0.07885 | 0.50 | 0.09203 | 0.09163 | 0.43 | 0.10889 | 0.10841 | 0.44 |
| 0.1 | 0.08026 | 0.07985 | 0.51 | 0.09212 | 0.09164 | 0.52 | 0.11442 | 0.11407 | 0.31 |