Susan Veldheer1, Jessica Yingst2, Vishal Midya2, Breianna Hummer2, Courtney Lester2, Nicolle Krebs2, Shari Hrabovsky2, Ashley Wilhelm2, Jason Liao2, Miao-Shan Yen3, Caroline Cobb3, Thomas Eissenberg3, Jonathan Foulds2. 1. Penn State University, Department of Public Health Sciences, Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, College of Medicine, 500 University Dr., Hershey, PA 17033, United States. Electronic address: sveldheer@psu.edu. 2. Penn State University, Department of Public Health Sciences, Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, College of Medicine, 500 University Dr., Hershey, PA 17033, United States. 3. Virginia Commonwealth University, Center for the Study of Tobacco Products, 1112 East Clay St., Richmond, VA 23298, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence about the effects of dual electronic cigarette (e-cig) and combustible cigarette use on lung health or other health outcomes. Studies that have evaluated these outcomes have not included estimates of e-cig or cigarette exposure in the analyses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data analyzed were from 263 smokers participating in a randomized controlled trial designed to encourage participants to reduce their combustible cigarette use by substituting with an e-cig or a non-electronic cigarette substitute (cig-sub). t-tests were used to evaluate changes from baseline at 1 month and 3 months in lung function, blood pressure, pulse, exhaled carbon monoxide, and weight. Linear mixed effects models were used to test associations between health outcomes and study product group, including exposure to the study products (e-cig and cig-sub times used and days used in the past 7 days) and cigarettes per day (CPD). RESULTS: There were few significant differences between the groups for lung function indices at any time point in the unadjusted analyses. There were significant reductions in diastolic blood pressure and pulse at 1 month in the unadjusted analyses for those in the e-cig group compared to the cig-sub group. CPD decreased significantly more for the e-cig group than for the cig-sub group at both time points. There were no significant associations between any measured health outcomes and group in the linear mixed effects models. CONCLUSION: E-cig use did not contribute to significant changes in health outcome markers as compared with use of a non-electronic cig-sub.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence about the effects of dual electronic cigarette (e-cig) and combustible cigarette use on lung health or other health outcomes. Studies that have evaluated these outcomes have not included estimates of e-cig or cigarette exposure in the analyses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data analyzed were from 263 smokers participating in a randomized controlled trial designed to encourage participants to reduce their combustible cigarette use by substituting with an e-cig or a non-electronic cigarette substitute (cig-sub). t-tests were used to evaluate changes from baseline at 1 month and 3 months in lung function, blood pressure, pulse, exhaled carbon monoxide, and weight. Linear mixed effects models were used to test associations between health outcomes and study product group, including exposure to the study products (e-cig and cig-sub times used and days used in the past 7 days) and cigarettes per day (CPD). RESULTS: There were few significant differences between the groups for lung function indices at any time point in the unadjusted analyses. There were significant reductions in diastolic blood pressure and pulse at 1 month in the unadjusted analyses for those in the e-cig group compared to the cig-sub group. CPD decreased significantly more for the e-cig group than for the cig-sub group at both time points. There were no significant associations between any measured health outcomes and group in the linear mixed effects models. CONCLUSION:E-cig use did not contribute to significant changes in health outcome markers as compared with use of a non-electronic cig-sub.
Authors: Aruni Bhatnagar; Laurie P Whitsel; Kurt M Ribisl; Chris Bullen; Frank Chaloupka; Mariann R Piano; Rose Marie Robertson; Timothy McAuley; David Goff; Neal Benowitz Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-08-24 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Andreas D Flouris; Maria S Chorti; Konstantina P Poulianiti; Athanasios Z Jamurtas; Konstantinos Kostikas; Manolis N Tzatzarakis; A Wallace Hayes; Aristidis M Tsatsakis; Yiannis Koutedakis Journal: Inhal Toxicol Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 2.724
Authors: Martin Chaumont; Alfred Bernard; Stéphanie Pochet; Christian Mélot; Charaf El Khattabi; Florence Reye; Karim Zouaoui Boudjeltia; Pierre Van Antwerpen; Cédric Delporte; Philippe van de Borne Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2018-07-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Boris Reidel; Giorgia Radicioni; Phillip W Clapp; Amina A Ford; Sabri Abdelwahab; Meghan E Rebuli; Prashamsha Haridass; Neil E Alexis; Ilona Jaspers; Mehmet Kesimer Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2018-02-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: David J Nutt; Lawrence D Phillips; David Balfour; H Valerie Curran; Martin Dockrell; Jonathan Foulds; Karl Fagerstrom; Kgosi Letlape; Anders Milton; Riccardo Polosa; John Ramsey; David Sweanor Journal: Eur Addict Res Date: 2014-04-03 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Alexa A Lopez; Caroline O Cobb; Jessica M Yingst; Susan Veldheer; Shari Hrabovsky; Miao-Shan Yen; Jonathan Foulds; Thomas Eissenberg Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-03-03 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Hayden McRobbie; Anna Phillips; Maciej L Goniewicz; Katie Myers Smith; Oliver Knight-West; Dunja Przulj; Peter Hajek Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2015-09
Authors: Jenny E Ozga-Hess; Nicholas J Felicione; Stuart G Ferguson; Geri Dino; Daniel Elswick; Catherine Whitworth; Nicholas Turiano; Melissa D Blank Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2019-08-21 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Marquita W Lewis-Thames; Marvin E Langston; Lindsay Fuzzell; Saira Khan; Justin X Moore; Yunan Han Journal: Prev Med Date: 2019-11-21 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Robert Tarran; R Graham Barr; Neal L Benowitz; Aruni Bhatnagar; Hong W Chu; Pamela Dalton; Claire M Doerschuk; M Bradley Drummond; Diane R Gold; Maciej L Goniewicz; Eric R Gross; Nadia N Hansel; Philip K Hopke; Robert A Kloner; Vladimir B Mikheev; Evan W Neczypor; Kent E Pinkerton; Lisa Postow; Irfan Rahman; Jonathan M Samet; Matthias Salathe; Catherine M Stoney; Philip S Tsao; Rachel Widome; Tian Xia; DaLiao Xiao; Loren E Wold Journal: Function (Oxf) Date: 2021-02-08
Authors: Loren E Wold; Robert Tarran; Evan W Neczypor; Matthew J Mears; Arunava Ghosh; M Flori Sassano; Richard J Gumina Journal: Circulation Date: 2022-01-18 Impact factor: 29.690