Sally Ozonoff1, Gregory S Young2, Jessica Brian3, Tony Charman4, Elizabeth Shephard4, Abbie Solish5, Lonnie Zwaigenbaum6. 1. MIND Institute, University of California, Davis. Electronic address: sozonoff@ucdavis.edu. 2. MIND Institute, University of California, Davis. 3. University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 4. Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK. 5. Autism Research Centre, Bloorview Research Institute, East York, Ontario, Canada. 6. University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) has been found to be remarkably stable but few studies have followed children not initially diagnosed with ASD beyond 3 years of age to examine late or delayed diagnoses. The present study used a prospective familial-risk design to identify children who had undergone multiple comprehensive assessments in preschool and were determined to be negative for ASD only to meet criteria for ASD when tested in middle childhood. METHOD: Data were pooled across 3 research teams studying later-born siblings of children with ASD. Fourteen children met inclusion criteria for the late-diagnosed group and were compared with a large sample of high- and low-risk siblings from the same sites who had ASD or typical development (TD) outcomes at 3 years of age. RESULTS: As a group, the late-diagnosed children scored between the TD and ASD groups on most measures administered at 3 years and differed significantly from the ASD group on most measures. However, there was significant heterogeneity among the late-diagnosed cases. Seven showed very little evidence of ASD in preschool, whereas 7 demonstrated subtle, subthreshold symptomatology. CONCLUSION: Some children with ASD might present with a subtle phenotype early in life or show a prolonged time course of symptom development. This emphasizes the need for screening and surveillance schedules that extend past 36 months and continued evaluation of any child who presents with atypical early development and/or high-risk status. The findings also shed light on reasons why the mean age of ASD diagnosis remains older than 4 years.
OBJECTIVE: The diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) has been found to be remarkably stable but few studies have followed children not initially diagnosed with ASD beyond 3 years of age to examine late or delayed diagnoses. The present study used a prospective familial-risk design to identify children who had undergone multiple comprehensive assessments in preschool and were determined to be negative for ASD only to meet criteria for ASD when tested in middle childhood. METHOD: Data were pooled across 3 research teams studying later-born siblings of children with ASD. Fourteen children met inclusion criteria for the late-diagnosed group and were compared with a large sample of high- and low-risk siblings from the same sites who had ASD or typical development (TD) outcomes at 3 years of age. RESULTS: As a group, the late-diagnosed children scored between the TD and ASD groups on most measures administered at 3 years and differed significantly from the ASD group on most measures. However, there was significant heterogeneity among the late-diagnosed cases. Seven showed very little evidence of ASD in preschool, whereas 7 demonstrated subtle, subthreshold symptomatology. CONCLUSION: Some children with ASD might present with a subtle phenotype early in life or show a prolonged time course of symptom development. This emphasizes the need for screening and surveillance schedules that extend past 36 months and continued evaluation of any child who presents with atypical early development and/or high-risk status. The findings also shed light on reasons why the mean age of ASD diagnosis remains older than 4 years.
Authors: Christina Corsello; Vanessa Hus; Andrew Pickles; Susan Risi; Edwin H Cook; Bennett L Leventhal; Catherine Lord Journal: J Child Psychol Psychiatry Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 8.982
Authors: Megan Micheletti; Courtney McCracken; John N Constantino; David Mandell; Warren Jones; Ami Klin Journal: J Child Psychol Psychiatry Date: 2019-04-29 Impact factor: 8.982
Authors: Jacob I Feldman; Sweeya Raj; Sarah M Bowman; Pooja Santapuram; Alexandra J Golden; Claire Daly; Kacie Dunham; Evan Suzman; Ashley E Augustine; Varsha Garla; Aine Muhumuza; Carissa J Cascio; Kathryn L Williams; Anne V Kirby; Bahar Keceli-Kaysili; Tiffany G Woynaroski Journal: J Speech Lang Hear Res Date: 2021-05-18 Impact factor: 2.297
Authors: Birkan Tunç; Juhi Pandey; Tanya St John; Shoba S Meera; Jennifer E Maldarelli; Lonnie Zwaigenbaum; Heather C Hazlett; Stephen R Dager; Kelly N Botteron; Jessica B Girault; Robert C McKinstry; Ragini Verma; Jed T Elison; John R Pruett; Joseph Piven; Annette M Estes; Robert T Schultz Journal: J Child Psychol Psychiatry Date: 2021-04-07 Impact factor: 8.265
Authors: Catherine Lord; Traolach S Brugha; Tony Charman; James Cusack; Guillaume Dumas; Thomas Frazier; Emily J H Jones; Rebecca M Jones; Andrew Pickles; Matthew W State; Julie Lounds Taylor; Jeremy Veenstra-VanderWeele Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2020-01-16 Impact factor: 52.329