Literature DB >> 30392600

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Evaluation of the Symptomatic Male Breast.

Bethany L Niell1, Ana P Lourenco2, Linda Moy3, Paul Baron4, Aarati D Didwania5, Roberta M diFlorio-Alexander6, Samantha L Heller7, Anna I Holbrook8, Huong T Le-Petross9, Alana A Lewin7, Tejas S Mehta10, Priscilla J Slanetz10, Ashley R Stuckey11, Daymen S Tuscano12, Gary A Ulaner13, Nina S Vincoff14, Susan P Weinstein15, Mary S Newell16.   

Abstract

Although the majority of male breast problems are benign with gynecomastia as the most common etiology, men with breast symptoms and their referring providers are typically concerned about whether or not it is due to breast cancer. If the differentiation between benign disease and breast cancer cannot be made on the basis of clinical findings, or if the clinical presentation is suspicious, imaging is indicated. The panel recommends the following approach to breast imaging in symptomatic men. In men with clinical findings consistent with gynecomastia or pseudogynecomastia, no imaging is routinely recommended. If an indeterminate breast mass is identified, the initial recommended imaging study is ultrasound in men younger than age 25, and mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis in men age 25 and older. If physical examination is suspicious for a male breast cancer, mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis is recommended irrespective of patient age. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Copyright © 2018 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AUC; Appropriate Use Criteria; Appropriateness Criteria; Digital breast tomosynthesis; Gynecomastia; Male breast cancer; Mammography; Pseudogynecomastia; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30392600     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.09.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  7 in total

Review 1.  An updated review of epidemiology, risk factors, and management of male breast cancer.

Authors:  Noman Ahmed Jang Khan; Maria Tirona
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  A Prospective Evaluation of Tru-Cut Biopsy and Fine-needle Aspiration Cytology in Male Breast Cancer Detection.

Authors:  Chiara Adriana Pistolese; Tommaso Perretta; Giulia Claroni; Lucia Anemona; Francesca Servadei; Alberto Collura; Michela Censi; Marco Materazzo; Marco Pellicciaro; Feliciana Lamacchia; Gianluca Vanni
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 3.  Image-based screening for men at high risk for breast cancer: Benefits and drawbacks.

Authors:  Ryan W Woods; Lonie R Salkowski; Mai Elezaby; Elizabeth S Burnside; Roberta M Strigel; Amy M Fowler
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 1.605

4.  An Approach Based on Mammographic Imaging and Radiomics for Distinguishing Male Benign and Malignant Lesions: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Yan Huang; Qin Xiao; Yiqun Sun; Zhe Wang; Qin Li; He Wang; Yajia Gu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 5.  An introduction to male breast cancer for urologists: epidemiology, diagnosis, principles of treatment, and special situations.

Authors:  Fabiana Baroni Alves Makdissi; Silvana S Santos; Almir Bitencourt; Fernando Augusto Batista Campos
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2022 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 6.  [A Review on Gynecomastia and Male Breast Cancer for Radiologists].

Authors:  Eun Jin Hwang; Joo Hee Cha
Journal:  Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi       Date:  2020-09-01

7.  Male Breast Cancer Review. A Rare Case of Pure DCIS: Imaging Protocol, Radiomics and Management.

Authors:  Daniele Ugo Tari; Luigi Morelli; Antonella Guida; Fabio Pinto
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.