Literature DB >> 30392396

21st-Century Oncology Drug Safety via New-Age Regulatory Standards and Practices.

Peter J Pitts1, Hervé Le Louet2, Gregory Katz3.   

Abstract

There is no such thing as a drug that is 100% safe or effective. Determining whether or not a new oncology treatment (or an additional indication for an existing medicine) should be approved by a regulatory licensing authority is, ultimately, as much regulatory science as public health art and nuance. There are many dynamic shifts in regulatory science (expedited review pathways, biomarker validation, use of real-world evidence, expanded off-label usage, etc) interpreted and expressed within the context of 21st-century oncology drug development, and these new tools and the learnings gleaned from them are helping to advance patient care. They are also helping us to carefully reconsider the levels of uncertainty we find in benefit-risk data and clinical calculations. New-Age Pharmacovigilance can be a tool in product development, regulatory review, postmarketing surveillance and enhanced clinical outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptive clinical trials; expedited reviews; pharmacoepidemiology; pharmacovigilance; real-world evidence

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30392396     DOI: 10.1177/2168479018809689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci        ISSN: 2168-4790            Impact factor:   1.778


  1 in total

1.  Twenty-First Century Global ADR Management: A Need for Clarification, Redesign, and Coordinated Action.

Authors:  Hervé Le Louët; Peter J Pitts
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 1.337

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.