| Literature DB >> 30392396 |
Peter J Pitts1, Hervé Le Louet2, Gregory Katz3.
Abstract
There is no such thing as a drug that is 100% safe or effective. Determining whether or not a new oncology treatment (or an additional indication for an existing medicine) should be approved by a regulatory licensing authority is, ultimately, as much regulatory science as public health art and nuance. There are many dynamic shifts in regulatory science (expedited review pathways, biomarker validation, use of real-world evidence, expanded off-label usage, etc) interpreted and expressed within the context of 21st-century oncology drug development, and these new tools and the learnings gleaned from them are helping to advance patient care. They are also helping us to carefully reconsider the levels of uncertainty we find in benefit-risk data and clinical calculations. New-Age Pharmacovigilance can be a tool in product development, regulatory review, postmarketing surveillance and enhanced clinical outcomes.Entities:
Keywords: adaptive clinical trials; expedited reviews; pharmacoepidemiology; pharmacovigilance; real-world evidence
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30392396 DOI: 10.1177/2168479018809689
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ther Innov Regul Sci ISSN: 2168-4790 Impact factor: 1.778