Literature DB >> 30392084

Brief summary of French guidelines for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia in ICU.

Marc Leone1, Lila Bouadma2, Bélaïd Bouhemad3, Olivier Brissaud4, Stéphane Dauger5, Sébastien Gibot6, Sami Hraiech7, Boris Jung8, Eric Kipnis9, Yoann Launey10, Charles-Edouard Luyt11, Dimitri Margetis12, Fabrice Michel13, Djamel Mokart14, Philippe Montravers15, Antoine Monsel16, Saad Nseir17, Jérôme Pugin18, Antoine Roquilly19, Lionel Velly20, Jean-Ralph Zahar21, Rémi Bruyère22, Gérald Chanques23.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine and the French Society of Intensive Care edited guidelines focused on hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) in intensive care unit. The goal of 16 French-speaking experts was to produce a framework enabling an easier decision-making process for intensivists.
RESULTS: The guidelines were related to 3 specific areas related to HAP (prevention, diagnosis and treatment) in 4 identified patient populations (COPD, neutropenia, post-operative and paediatric). The literature analysis and the formulation of the guidelines were conducted according to the Grade of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. An extensive literature research over the last 10 years was conducted based on publications indexed in PubMed™ and Cochrane™ databases.
CONCLUSIONS: HAP should be prevented by a standardised multimodal approach and the use of selective digestive decontamination in units where multidrug-resistant bacteria prevalence was below 20%. Diagnosis relies on clinical assessment and microbiological findings. Monotherapy, in the absence of risk factors for multidrug-resistant bacteria, non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli and/or increased mortality (septic shock, organ failure), is strongly recommended. After microbiological documentation, it is recommended to reduce the spectrum and to prefer monotherapy for the antibiotic therapy of HAP, including for non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30392084      PMCID: PMC6215539          DOI: 10.1186/s13613-018-0444-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intensive Care        ISSN: 2110-5820            Impact factor:   6.925


Introduction

Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) is the most common infection in the intensive care unit (ICU) [1]. In the ICU, HAP is associated with a mortality rate of 20% and with increased duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU and hospital length-of-stay [2, 3]. The criteria to diagnose pneumonia are shown in Table 1 (Fig. 1).
Table 1

Criteria for defining pneumonia

Radiological signs
 Two successive chest radiographs showing new or progressive lung infiltrates In the absence of medical history of underlying heart or lung disease, a single chest radiograph is enough
And at least one of the following signs
 Body temperature > 38,3 °C without any other cause Leucocytes < 4000/mm3 or ≥ 12,000/mm3
And at least two of the following signs
 Purulent sputum Cough or dyspnoea Declining oxygenation or increased oxygen requirement or need for respiratory assistance
Fig. 1

Multimodal healthcare associated pneumonia prevention protocol (expert opinion)

Criteria for defining pneumonia Multimodal healthcare associated pneumonia prevention protocol (expert opinion)

Method

Sixteen French-speaking experts produce guidelines in three specific areas related to HAP: prevention, diagnosis and treatment as well as the specificities pertaining to different identified patient populations (COPD, neutropenia, post-operative and paediatric). The schedule of the group was defined upstream (Table 2) (Fig. 2).
Table 2

Guideline timeline

5 December 2016Start-up meeting
6 March 2017Vote: first round
13 March 2017Post-vote deliberation meeting
1 April 2017Vote: second round
16 April 2017Amendment of two guidelines
28 April 2017Vote of the two amended guidelines
10 May 2017Guideline finalisation meeting
Fig. 2

Selective digestive decontamination protocol (expert opinion)

Guideline timeline Selective digestive decontamination protocol (expert opinion) The questions were formulated according to the PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) format. The formulation of the guidelines was conducted according to the GRADE methodology (Grade of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation) [4, 5]. In the absence of supporting literature, a question could be addressed by a recommendation under the form of an expert opinion (“the experts suggest that…”) (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

Diagnostic procedure (expert opinion)

Diagnostic procedure (expert opinion) These guidelines with their arguments were published in the journal Anaesthesia Critical Care and Pain Medicine [6] (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4

Treatment options (expert opinion)

Treatment options (expert opinion) First area, PREVENTION Which HAP prevention approaches decrease morbidity and mortality in ICU patients? We recommend using a standardised multimodal HAP prevention approach in order to decrease ICU patient morbidity (Grade 1+). We suggest using a standardised multimodal approach aiming at preventing HAP in order to decrease paediatric ICU patient morbidity (Grade 2+). In units where multidrug-resistant bacteria prevalence is low (< 20%), we suggest applying routine selective digestive decontamination using a topical antiseptic administered enterally and a maximal 5-day course of systemic prophylactic antibiotic to decrease mortality (Grade 2+). Within a standardised multimodal HAP prevention approach, we suggest combining some of the following methods to decrease ICU patient morbidity: Promote the use of non-invasive ventilation to avoid tracheal intubation (mainly in post-operative digestive surgery patients and in patients with COPD), Favour orotracheal over nasotracheal intubation when required Limit dose and duration of sedatives and analgesics (promote their use guided by sedation/pain/agitation scales, and/or daily interruptions), Initiate early enteral feeding (within the first 48 h of ICU admission), Regularly verify endotracheal tube cuff pressure, Perform sub-glottic suction (every 6 to 8 h) using an appropriate endotracheal tube (Grade 2+). Within a standardised multimodal HAP prevention approach, we suggest not using the following methods to decrease ICU patient morbidity: Systematic early (< day 7) tracheotomy (except for specific indications), Anti-ulcer prophylaxis (except for specific indications), Post-pyloric enteral feeding (except for specific indications), Administration of probiotics and/or synbiotics, Early systematic change of the humidifier filter (except for specific manufacturer recommendations) Use of closed suctioning systems for endotracheal secretions, Use of antiseptic-coated intubation tubes or with tubes an “optimised” cuff shape, Selective oropharyngeal decontamination (SOD) with povidone-iodine, Use of prophylactic nebulised antibiotics, Daily skin decontamination using antiseptics (Grade 2−). In weaning of COPD patients from ventilation, we suggest using non-invasive ventilation to reduce length of invasive mechanical ventilation, incidence of HAP, morbidity and mortality (Grade 2+). Second area, DIAGNOSIS What methods to diagnose HAP should be used to decrease ICU patient morbidity and mortality? We suggest not using the clinical scores (CPIS, modified CPIS) for diagnosing HAP (Grade 2−). We suggest collecting microbiological airway samples, regardless of type, before initiation of any change in antibiotic therapy (Grade 2+). We suggest collecting microbiological airway samples, regardless of type, before initiation of any change in antibiotic therapy (Grade 2+). We suggest not measuring plasma or alveolar levels of procalcitonin or soluble TREM-1 to diagnose HAP (Grade 2−). Third area, TREATMENT What therapeutic options for HAP should be used to decrease ICU patient morbidity and mortality? We suggest immediately collecting samples and initiating antibiotic treatment taking into consideration risk factors for multidrug-resistant bacteria in patients with suspected HAP and haemodynamic or respiratory compromise (shock or acute respiratory distress syndrome) or frailty such as immunosuppression [95-100] (Grade 2+). We recommend treating HAP in mechanically ventilated immunocompetent patients empirically by a monotherapy, in the absence of risk factors for multidrug-resistant bacteria, non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli and/or increased mortality (septic shock, organ failure) [101-113] (Grade 1+). The experts suggest not systematically directing empiric antibiotic therapy against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the treatment of HAP [114-119] (Experts Opinion). We suggest reducing the spectrum and preferring monotherapy for the antibiotic therapy of HAP after microbiological documentation, including for non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli [114,115, 120–128] (Grade 2+). We recommend not prolonging for more than 7 days the antibiotic treatment for HAP, including for non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli, apart from specific situations (immunosuppression, empyema, necrotising or abscessed pneumonia) [129-135] (Grade 1−). We suggest administering nebulised colimycine (sodium colistiméthate) and/or aminoglycosides in documented HAP due multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli documented pneumonia established as sensitive to colimycin and/or aminoglycoside, when no other antibiotics can be used (based on the results of susceptibility testing) [136-152] (Grade 2+). We recommend not administering statins as adjuvant treatment for HAP [153-161] (Grade 1−).
  6 in total

1.  Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.

Authors:  David Atkins; Dana Best; Peter A Briss; Martin Eccles; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Signe Flottorp; Gordon H Guyatt; Robin T Harbour; Margaret C Haugh; David Henry; Suzanne Hill; Roman Jaeschke; Gillian Leng; Alessandro Liberati; Nicola Magrini; James Mason; Philippa Middleton; Jacek Mrukowicz; Dianne O'Connell; Andrew D Oxman; Bob Phillips; Holger J Schünemann; Tessa Tan-Torres Edejer; Helena Varonen; Gunn E Vist; John W Williams; Stephanie Zaza
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-06-19

2.  GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.

Authors:  Gordon H Guyatt; Andrew D Oxman; Gunn E Vist; Regina Kunz; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-04-26

Review 3.  Hospital-acquired pneumonia in ICU.

Authors:  Marc Leone; Lila Bouadma; Bélaïd Bouhemad; Olivier Brissaud; Stéphane Dauger; Sébastien Gibot; Sami Hraiech; Boris Jung; Eric Kipnis; Yoann Launey; Charles-Edouard Luyt; Dimitri Margetis; Fabrice Michel; Djamel Mokart; Philippe Montravers; Antoine Monsel; Saad Nseir; Jérôme Pugin; Antoine Roquilly; Lionel Velly; Jean-Ralph Zahar; Rémi Bruyère; Gérald Chanques
Journal:  Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Attributable mortality of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised prevention studies.

Authors:  Wilhelmina G Melsen; Maroeska M Rovers; Rolf H H Groenwold; Dennis C J J Bergmans; Christophe Camus; Torsten T Bauer; Ernst W Hanisch; Bengt Klarin; Mirelle Koeman; Wolfgang A Krueger; Jean-Claude Lacherade; Leonardo Lorente; Ziad A Memish; Lee E Morrow; Giuseppe Nardi; Christianne A van Nieuwenhoven; Grant E O'Keefe; George Nakos; Frank A Scannapieco; Philippe Seguin; Thomas Staudinger; Arzu Topeli; Miquel Ferrer; Marc J M Bonten
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 25.071

5.  The epidemiology of nonventilator hospital-acquired pneumonia in the United States.

Authors:  Karen K Giuliano; Dian Baker; Barbara Quinn
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 2.918

Review 6.  Nosocomial pneumonia in 27 ICUs in Europe: perspectives from the EU-VAP/CAP study.

Authors:  D Koulenti; E Tsigou; J Rello
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 3.267

  6 in total
  7 in total

Review 1.  Ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically ill patients with COVID-19 infection: a narrative review.

Authors:  Sean Boyd; Saad Nseir; Alejandro Rodriguez; Ignacio Martin-Loeches
Journal:  ERJ Open Res       Date:  2022-07-25

2.  Ventilator-associated pneumonia prevention in the Intensive care unit using Postpyloric tube feeding in China (VIP study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Linhui Hu; Kaiyi Peng; Xiangwei Huang; Zheng Wang; Quanzhong Wu; Yumei Xiao; Yating Hou; Yuemei He; Xinjuan Zhou; Chunbo Chen
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 2.728

3.  Extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacterales faecal carriage in a medical intensive care unit: low rates of cross-transmission and infection.

Authors:  Renaud Prevel; Alexandre Boyer; Fatima M'Zali; Thibaut Cockenpot; Agnes Lasheras; Véronique Dubois; Didier Gruson
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 4.887

4.  Predictive risk factors for postoperative pneumonia after heart transplantation.

Authors:  Charles Vidal; Romain Pasqualotto; Arthur James; Pauline Dureau; Julie Rasata; Guillaume Coutance; Shaida Varnous; Pascal Leprince; Julien Amour; Adrien Bouglé
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 2.217

5.  Clinical impact of ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Marc Le Pape; Céline Besnard; Camelia Acatrinei; Jérôme Guinard; Maxime Boutrot; Claire Genève; Thierry Boulain; François Barbier
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 10.318

Review 6.  Ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults: a narrative review.

Authors:  Laurent Papazian; Michael Klompas; Charles-Edouard Luyt
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 7.  Pulmonary infections complicating ARDS.

Authors:  Charles-Edouard Luyt; Lila Bouadma; Andrew Conway Morris; Jayesh A Dhanani; Marin Kollef; Jeffrey Lipman; Ignacio Martin-Loeches; Saad Nseir; Otavio T Ranzani; Antoine Roquilly; Matthieu Schmidt; Antoni Torres; Jean-François Timsit
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 17.440

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.