Literature DB >> 30392025

Are electronic cigarettes a healthier alternative to conventional tobacco smoking?

Jan Löhler1, Barbara Wollenberg2.   

Abstract

Electronic cigarettes (EC) with and without nicotine are used by more and more consumers within the last decade. The long-term risks of vapor inhalation are unknown. This study should describe the state of the art of knowledge with respect to the following four items: (1) ingredients of the vapor and their potential risks, the influence of EC on smoking of combustible tobacco to (2) adults and (3) the youth, and (4) the side effects of passive vaping. The vapor of EC contains, in comparison to tobacco smoke, less harmful substances, qualitatively and quantitatively. But, due to failing standardization of EC, this comparison is difficult. Adults are often using both, EC and combustible cigarettes dually. In addition, EC were used for supporting smoke-quitting. Unfortunately, consuming EC with and without nicotine due later to a higher risk of conventional tobacco smoking for the user. In general, the effects of passive vaporing are unknown. Although the vapor of EC is less harmful than tobacco smoke, EC are not hazard-free lifestyle products. Technical standardization should be desirable. Adult smoker's benefit using EC is given by completely change to EC only. The rates of success using EC for smoke quitting are not well evaluated. Children and their parents should be informed on the risks of EC use as a precursor of combustible smoking mandatorily. Internet selling EC to any non-adult should be forbidden by law. EC ought not to be allowed to weaken non-smoker's rights, and third persons should be protected by the potential hazards of EC vaporing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electronic nicotine delivery systems; Gateway hypothesis; Head and neck cancer; Ingredients; Review; Risks; Smoking; Smoking cessation; e-Cigarette

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30392025     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-018-5185-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  4 in total

Review 1.  DNA damage, DNA repair and carcinogenicity: Tobacco smoke versus electronic cigarette aerosol.

Authors:  Moon-Shong Tang; Hyun-Wook Lee; Mao-Wen Weng; Hsiang-Tsui Wang; Yu Hu; Lung-Chi Chen; Sung-Hyun Park; Huei-Wei Chan; Jiheng Xu; Xue-Ru Wu; He Wang; Rui Yang; Karen Galdane; Kathryn Jackson; Annie Chu; Elizabeth Halzack
Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 7.015

Review 2.  Electronic Cigarettes and Head and Neck Cancer Risk-Current State of Art.

Authors:  Marta Szukalska; Krzysztof Szyfter; Ewa Florek; Juan P Rodrigo; Alessandra Rinaldo; Antti A Mäkitie; Primož Strojan; Robert P Takes; Carlos Suárez; Nabil F Saba; Boudewijn J M Braakhuis; Alfio Ferlito
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 6.639

3.  Flavorless vs. Flavored Electronic Cigarette-Generated Aerosol and E-Liquid on the Growth of Common Oral Commensal Streptococci.

Authors:  Jacob S Fischman; Swapna Sista; DongKeun Lee; Giancarlo A Cuadra; Dominic L Palazzolo
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  Changes in Biomarkers of Exposure on Switching From a Conventional Cigarette to the glo Tobacco Heating Product: A Randomized, Controlled Ambulatory Study.

Authors:  Nathan Gale; Michael McEwan; Oscar M Camacho; George Hardie; James Murphy; Christopher J Proctor
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 4.244

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.