Literature DB >> 30391948

Contribution of Inbred Singletons to Variance Component Estimation of Heritability and Linkage.

Lucy Blondell1, August Blackburn2, Mark Z Kos2, John Blangero2, Harald H H Göring2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: An interesting consequence of consanguinity is that the inbred singleton becomes informative for genetic variance. We determine the contribution of an inbred singleton to variance component analysis of heritability and linkage.
METHODS: Statistical theory for the power of variance component analysis of quantitative traits is used to determine the expected contribution of an inbred singleton to likelihood-ratio tests of heritability and linkage.
RESULTS: In variance component models, an inbred singleton contributes relatively little to a test of heritability but can contribute substantively to a test of linkage. For small-to-moderate quantitative trait locus (QTL) effects and a level of inbreeding comparable to matings between first cousins (the preferred form of union in many human populations), an inbred singleton can carry nearly 25% of the information of a non-inbred sib pair. In more highly inbred contexts available with experimental animal populations, nonhuman primate colonies, and some human subpopulations, the contribution of an inbred singleton relative to a sib pair can exceed 50%.
CONCLUSIONS: Inbred individuals, even in isolation from other members of a sample, can contribute to variance component estimation and tests of heritability and linkage. Under certain conditions, the informativeness of the inbred singleton can approach that of a non-inbred sib pair.
© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Heritability; Inbreeding; Linkage analysis; Statistical genetics; Variance component analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30391948      PMCID: PMC6277139          DOI: 10.1159/000492830

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Hered        ISSN: 0001-5652            Impact factor:   0.444


  18 in total

1.  The effect of pedigree complexity on quantitative trait linkage analysis.

Authors:  T D Dyer; J Blangero; J T Williams; H H Göring; M C Mahaney
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.135

Review 2.  Does inbreeding lead to decreased human fertility?

Authors:  A H Bittles; J C Grant; S G Sullivan; R Hussain
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.533

3.  Inbreeding: one word, several meanings.

Authors:  A Jacquard
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 1.570

Review 4.  Endogamy, consanguinity and community genetics.

Authors:  A H Bittles
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.166

5.  The bases of western attitudes to consanguineous marriage.

Authors:  A H Bittles
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.449

Review 6.  Consanguineous marriage and childhood health.

Authors:  A H Bittles
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.449

7.  Power of variance component linkage analysis-II. Discrete traits.

Authors:  J T Williams; J Blangero
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.670

8.  The prevalence and demographic characteristics of consanguineous marriages in Pakistan.

Authors:  R Hussain; A H Bittles
Journal:  J Biosoc Sci       Date:  1998-04

9.  The relative efficiency and power of small-pedigree studies of the heritability of a quantitative trait.

Authors:  N J Schork; M A Schork
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.444

10.  Inbreeding effects on dental morphometrics in Papio hamadryas.

Authors:  R M Baume; B A Lapin
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 2.868

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.