Literature DB >> 30391734

Laparoscopic extraction of gastric self-expandable metallic stent after migration in ileum: A case report.

F-X Terryn1, E Dereeper2, S Lo Bue3.   

Abstract

Revisional surgery in bariatric patients can sometimes lead to life-threatening complications that need a fast diagnosis and treatment as well as a multidisciplinary approach. If left undiagnosed or untreated, this may lead to sepsis, multiple organ failure, and death. In this case report, we describe the management of a gastric perforation which occurred after conversion of a gastric banding to a sleeve gastrectomy.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Case report; Gastric banding; Laparoscopy; Self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS); Sleeve gastrectomy; Stent migration

Year:  2018        PMID: 30391734      PMCID: PMC6216075          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2018.10.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep        ISSN: 2210-2612


Introduction

Revisional surgery in bariatric patients can sometimes lead to life-threatening complications that need a fast diagnosis and treatment as well as a multidisciplinary approach. If left undiagnosed or untreated, this may lead to sepsis, multiple organ failure, and death. In this case report, we describe the management of a gastric perforation which occured after conversion of a gastric banding to a sleeve gastrectomy. This work has been reported in line with the SCARE criteria [1].

Presentation of case

A 38-year-old woman has a history of adjustable gastric banding in 2014 for morbid obesity. Because of an intragastric migration, this banding was removed endoscopically in october 2017. As the patient did not lose weight, we performed a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in january 2018 after a multidisciplinary discussion who approved the surgery. Weight was 97 kg and BMI was 38,4 kg/m2. The day after the surgery, there was a clinical suspicion of peritonitis. A CT-scan (Fig. 1) confirmed this diagnosis and suggested a gastrojejunal leak. We performed a laparoscopic suture of an anterior cardial perforation on the previous gastric banding position, omentoplasty, lavage and drainage. There was no insufficiency on the staples lines.
Fig. 1

One day after laparoscopic gastric banding conversion to sleeve gastrectomy: sagittal plane of CT scan with obvious anterior cardial leak (red arrow).

One day after laparoscopic gastric banding conversion to sleeve gastrectomy: sagittal plane of CT scan with obvious anterior cardial leak (red arrow). The perforation did not heal after this second operation and five days later, the patient required two complementary percutaneous pleural and abdominal drainages and a 2 days stay in our intensive care unit for a sepsis management (Dindo-Clavien 4b). After recovery, on the third postoperative week, we decided to perform a gastric self-expandable stent implantation to cover the perforation. Unfortunately, this prosthesis migrated two weeks after its implantation to the small intestine. An endoscopic extraction was not possible because of its ileal location (Fig. 2). Nevertheless, the gastroscopy confirmed the healing of the gastric perforation, so the patient was allowed to resume enteral feeding.
Fig. 2

Radiographs of the migrated self-expandable gastric stent.

Radiographs of the migrated self-expandable gastric stent. Thus, we performed a laparoscopic extraction of the prosthesis six weeks after the sleeve gastrectomy (Fig. 3). No complication followed this last surgery.
Fig. 3

Laparoscopic removal of self-expandable gastric stent.

Laparoscopic removal of self-expandable gastric stent. Two months postoperatively, the patient had lost 13 kg (total body weight loss was 13,4%, BMI is now 33 kg/m2, and %EBMIL is 40%).

Discussion

As we mentionned, there was no insufficiency on the staples lines to be seen during the laparoscopic exploration and the leak was likely to be related to the severe adhesional status between the liver and stomach caused by the intragastric migration of the gastric banding. Laparoscopic conversion of gastric banding to sleeve gastrectomy following poor weight loss results is a common procedure in our institution. According to Janik et al. and Spaniolas et al., the conversion from laparoscopic banding to sleeve gastrectomy leads to lesser morbidity than to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass [2,3]. Because the patient showed early signs of peritonitis, we preferred the surgical option at first. There was only a 24 h delay between the laparoscopic conversion to sleeve gastrectomy and the laparoscopic suture of the gastric perforation. Okazaki et al. recently showed that endoscopic treatment of gastric fistulas seems to be a safe and effective procedure on selected patients [4]. Stent implacement is also recommended by the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery to treat fistulas developing after bariatric surgery [5]. In this case, we chose a self-expandable gastric stent instead of good endoscopic alternative procedures such as endoscopic vacuum assisted closure therapy. Of course this could have been a good alternative. Intestinal bleeding or aorto-oesophageal fistulas as described complications after self-expandable metal stent implantation but the most frequent is the stent migration with an approximate rate of 20–40% [6]. Unfortunately, a retrospective review of Singer et al. found no pattern to reduce it [7].

Conclusion

In the future, we will likely observe an increase in gastric banding conversion to other bariatric surgical procedures for patients with poor results on excess weight loss. Life-threatening complications such as leaks can occur. For non-conservative cases, a good combination of surgical and endoscopic procedures and a multidisciplinary approach are needed to resolve the problem successfully. Of course, a bigger number of cases would be necessary to prove and deepen these results.

Conflicts of interest

All authors declare to have no conflicts of interest.

Sources of funding

All authors declare to have no source of fundings.

Ethical approval

The study is exempt from ethnical approval in our institution.

Consent

We obtained the patient’s consent and added a consent section in the manuscript.

Author contributions

All authors were in charge of the patient and contributed equally in the realisation of this manuscript. Salvatore Lo Bue is the head surgeon and performed the operation, I (François-Xavier Terryn) am the trainee surgeon and assisted the intervention. Etienne Dereeper is the anesthesiologist who took care of the patient. I was in charge of the redaction of the case and both of the co-authors made interesting comments on my first version of this case report, especially about the discussion and helped with the review of the literature.

Registration of research studies

Not applicable for this case report.

Guarantor

François-Xavier Terryn.

Provenance and peer review

Not commissioned, externally peer reviewed.
  7 in total

1.  Efficacy and Safety of Stents in the Treatment of Fistula After Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ossamu Okazaki; Wanderley M Bernardo; Vitor O Brunaldi; Cesar C de Clemente Junior; Maurício K Minata; Diogo T H de Moura; Thiago F de Souza; Josemberg Marins Campos; Marco Aurélio Santo; Eduardo G H de Moura
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 2.  ASMBS position statement on prevention, detection, and treatment of gastrointestinal leak after gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy, including the roles of imaging, surgical exploration, and nonoperative management.

Authors:  Julie Kim; Dan Azagury; Dan Eisenberg; Eric DeMaria; Guilherme M Campos
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 4.734

3.  Safety of Revision Sleeve Gastrectomy Compared to Roux-Y Gastric Bypass After Failed Gastric Banding: Analysis of the MBSAQIP.

Authors:  Michał R Janik; Tomasz G Rogula; Rami R Mustafa; Adel Alhaj Saleh; Leena Khaitan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Predictive Factors for the Migration of Endoscopic Self-Expanding Metal Stents Placed in the Foregut.

Authors:  Jordan L Singer; Amir H Aryaie; Mojtaba Fayezizadeh; Jon Lash; Jeffrey M Marks
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 2.058

5.  Single stage conversion from adjustable gastric banding to sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: an analysis of 4875 patients.

Authors:  Konstantinos Spaniolas; Andrew T Bates; Salvatore Docimo; Nabeel R Obeid; Mark A Talamini; Aurora D Pryor
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 4.734

6.  Efficacy of endoscopic management of leak after foregut surgery with endoscopic covered self-expanding metal stents (SEMS).

Authors:  Amir H Aryaie; Jordan L Singer; Mojtaba Fayezizadeh; Jon Lash; Jeffrey M Marks
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  The SCARE Statement: Consensus-based surgical case report guidelines.

Authors:  Riaz A Agha; Alexander J Fowler; Alexandra Saeta; Ishani Barai; Shivanchan Rajmohan; Dennis P Orgill
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 6.071

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.