Literature DB >> 30391608

Is the Posterior-Only Approach Sufficient for Treating Cervical Spine Metastases? The Evidence from a Case Series.

Enrico Gallazzi1, Luca Cannavò2, Giuseppe G Perrucchini2, Ilaria Morelli2, Alessandro D Luzzati2, Carmine Zoccali3, Gennaro Scotto2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Few studies have evaluated surgical options in the treatment of cervical metastatic disease. The aim of this study is to report the surgical outcomes of patients treated with the posterior-only approach for metastatic cervical disease.
METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, all cases treated in our institution from 2009 to 2017 were reviewed. Six (20%) patients had intracompartimental lesions (Tomita 1-3), whereas 24 (80%) patients had extracompartimental lesions (Tomita 4-7), with extensive anterior column involvement. All patients were surgically treated with laminectomy and posterior stabilization. Pain and neurologic function were evaluated before and after surgery.
RESULTS: Thirty patients were included (15 female, 15 male), with a mean age of 60.6 ± 11.56 years (range 35-82 years). Lesions were located in 7 patients (23.3%) in the upper cervical spine and in 14 patients (46.6%) and in 9 patients (30,1%) in the mid-cervical and in the cervicothoracic junction, respectively. At a mean follow up of 13.7 ± 14.8 months, 15 (50%) patients died from their disease. Pain decreased in all patients after surgery, (preoperative NRS 5.57 ± 1.81 postoperative Numeric Rating Scale of 2.1 ± 1.0, P < 0.00001). Two patients (6.7%) had significant neurologic worsening after surgery. Two (6.9%) patients had surgical-site infection that required reintervention. No mechanical failures were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: In our series, posterior-only fixation provided postoperative pain relief and achieve spinal stability, ultimately improving the quality of life. In conclusion, posterior-approach decompression and stabilization is a safe and feasible procedure in patients with neurologic or mechanical instability for cervical spine metastasis.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior approach; Cervical fixation; Cervical spine; Cord decompression; Metastasis; Oncology; Pain; Pedicle screws; Posterior approach; Spinal cord compression; Surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30391608     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  3 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of MIS and open decompression surgery for spinal metastases in the last two decades.

Authors:  Bhoresh Dhamija; Dheeraj Batheja; Birender Singh Balain
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-09-25

2.  Postoperative outcomes of subaxial cervical spine metastasis: Comparison among the anterior, posterior, and combined approaches.

Authors:  Panya Luksanapruksa; Borriwat Santipas; Panupol Rajinda; Theera Chueaboonchai; Korpphong Chituaarikul; Patawut Bovonratwet; Sirichai Wilartratsami
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 4.072

3.  Surgical outcomes and risk factors for poor outcomes in patients with cervical spine metastasis: a prospective study.

Authors:  Yutaro Kanda; Kenichiro Kakutani; Yoshitada Sakai; Zhongying Zhang; Takashi Yurube; Shingo Miyazaki; Yuji Kakiuchi; Yoshiki Takeoka; Ryu Tsujimoto; Kunihiko Miyazaki; Hiroki Ohnishi; Yuichi Hoshino; Toru Takada; Ryosuke Kuroda
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 2.359

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.